Cheney and Hutchinson broke federal laws when conspiring to produce false Jan 6 testimony.

Werbung:
So you support democrats breaking moral laws and rules of conduct as long as they can avoid being arrested for stepping over the murky boundary between uncivilized behavior and out and out lawbreaking?
When you are caught with you pants around your ankles and changed the subject and start you post wi th a “so” we all know you are squirming. Your performance here is just pitiful.
 
nowhere in your post does it mention which federal law was broken or even if a federal was broken at all.

You attempt to deceive all the time.
Are you saying there was nothing wrong with Cheney meeting in secret with a subpoenaed witness before the witness was to testify before the investigation committee she co-chaired?
 
Are you saying there was nothing wrong with Cheney meeting in secret with a subpoenaed witness before the witness was to testify before the investigation committee she co-chaired?
no, they are obviously saying you claimed they broke federal laws and when challenged swiftly changed to something else, because you couldn't name the laws you claimed were broken.

because you are a lying mooron lol
 
no, they are obviously saying you claimed they broke federal laws and when challenged swiftly changed to something else, because you couldn't name the laws you claimed were broken.

because you are a lying mooron lol
The point is that Cheney was wrong to meet privately with a witness prior to the witness testifying before her investigation committee.
 
The point is that Cheney was wrong to meet privately with a witness prior to the witness testifying before her investigation committee.
the point is that you lied by claiming she did something illegal, you put it right in the headline of the thread, and when caught in your usual lies, you swiftly tried to change your story and cover for your lies with a different story, instead of apologizing like a patriotic american would do.
 
the point is that you lied by claiming she did something illegal, you put it right in the headline of the thread, and when caught in your usual lies, you swiftly tried to change your story and cover for your lies with a different story, instead of apologizing like a patriotic american would do.
I am not sure if what she did violated laws as well as ethics rules but you seem intent on focusing on semantics while attempting to ignore her unethical behavior.

Judges tampering with witnesses is illegal in some states while maybe not in others.


Intimidating a Witness​

Even seemingly benign conversations between criminal defendants and potential witnesses can result in an accusation of witness tampering.​

By Deborah C. England, Attorney · Seattle University School of Law
Updated 2/08/2023
Interfering with a witness's testimony or cooperation in a criminal case is a criminal act that can be a misdemeanor or a felony. Intimidating or tampering with a witness involves trying to get a witness to lie, say certain things under oath, alter or destroy evidence, or not testify or cooperate with authorities at all. Examples include:

  • asking a witness to testify in a certain way, to lie, to not testify, to not report a crime, or to not cooperate with police
  • offering a witness a bribe (money, material goods, or some other benefit)
  • threatening a witness with physical violence or property damage
  • threatening the witness's family members or loved ones, and
  • preventing a witness from attending a legal proceeding, such as a court hearing, deposition, or trial.
Some states' laws criminalize intentionally influencing a witness by any means. For example, if someone asked a friend not to testify or asked them to leave out damaging facts during their testimony, this can be witness tampering in some states.
 
I am not sure if what she did violated laws as well as ethics rules but you seem intent on focusing on semantics while attempting to ignore her unethical behavior.
so you claimed someone was a criminal without proof? you "weren't sure"? wow that's incredibly anti american.

its not "semantics" to discuss whether someone was a criminal or not. that's an important distinction..well, important if you aren't an anti american hater.
 
Are you saying there was nothing wrong with Cheney meeting in secret with a subpoenaed witness before the witness was to testify before the investigation committee she co-chaired?
I am saying:

nowhere in your post does it mention which federal law was broken or even if a federal was broken at all.

You attempt to deceive all the time.
 
Werbung:
Silly Mark spends his life listening to Trump's racist Nazi propaganda and then claiming that God is somehow on his side.
We all know who really broke many laws on Jan 6th, and it was Trump. He summoned an armed mob and attacked Congress in a plot to stay in power after he LOST by over seven million votes.
 
Back
Top