First she committed a crime and now she violated rules.She violated rules of conduct by meeting secretly with a witness before the witrness went before cameras in the House investigation.
You have not shame.
First she committed a crime and now she violated rules.She violated rules of conduct by meeting secretly with a witness before the witrness went before cameras in the House investigation.
When you are caught with you pants around your ankles and changed the subject and start you post wi th a “so” we all know you are squirming. Your performance here is just pitiful.So you support democrats breaking moral laws and rules of conduct as long as they can avoid being arrested for stepping over the murky boundary between uncivilized behavior and out and out lawbreaking?
Are you saying there was nothing wrong with Cheney meeting in secret with a subpoenaed witness before the witness was to testify before the investigation committee she co-chaired?nowhere in your post does it mention which federal law was broken or even if a federal was broken at all.
You attempt to deceive all the time.
no, they are obviously saying you claimed they broke federal laws and when challenged swiftly changed to something else, because you couldn't name the laws you claimed were broken.Are you saying there was nothing wrong with Cheney meeting in secret with a subpoenaed witness before the witness was to testify before the investigation committee she co-chaired?
Which is it? Did she commit a crime, violate ethics rules, or neither?First she committed a crime and now she violated rules.
You have not shame.
The point is that Cheney was wrong to meet privately with a witness prior to the witness testifying before her investigation committee.no, they are obviously saying you claimed they broke federal laws and when challenged swiftly changed to something else, because you couldn't name the laws you claimed were broken.
because you are a lying mooron lol
which is it indeed? you keep changing your story when your lies are uncovered. lol.Which is it? Did she commit a crime, violate ethics rules, or neither?
the point is that you lied by claiming she did something illegal, you put it right in the headline of the thread, and when caught in your usual lies, you swiftly tried to change your story and cover for your lies with a different story, instead of apologizing like a patriotic american would do.The point is that Cheney was wrong to meet privately with a witness prior to the witness testifying before her investigation committee.
I am not sure if what she did violated laws as well as ethics rules but you seem intent on focusing on semantics while attempting to ignore her unethical behavior.the point is that you lied by claiming she did something illegal, you put it right in the headline of the thread, and when caught in your usual lies, you swiftly tried to change your story and cover for your lies with a different story, instead of apologizing like a patriotic american would do.
so you claimed someone was a criminal without proof? you "weren't sure"? wow that's incredibly anti american.I am not sure if what she did violated laws as well as ethics rules but you seem intent on focusing on semantics while attempting to ignore her unethical behavior.
I am saying:Are you saying there was nothing wrong with Cheney meeting in secret with a subpoenaed witness before the witness was to testify before the investigation committee she co-chaired?
Your dishonest participation here is shameful.Which is it? Did she commit a crime, violate ethics rules, or neither?
Crime—> rule —> wrong.The point is that Cheney was wrong to meet privately with a witness prior to the witness testifying before her investigation committee.
Use some of the at Christian morality and admit you misspoke. You have diarrhea of the mouth.I am not sure if what she did violated laws as well as ethics rules but you seem intent on focusing on semantics while attempting to ignore her unethical behavior.