Blacks cry "RACISM" when black police chief is indicted on multiple charges

Smartmatic admits it's US machines were designed to commit fraud in Venezuela. That is more reason America should require Democrat voting machines be randomly investigated after every election.
There are no such things as democrat voting machines
God you are stupid lol
 
Werbung:
There are no such things as democrat voting machines
God you are stupid lol
Democrat voting machines are those manufactured by companies like Dominion which are run by leftists, operated by election officials controlled by Democrats, and protected by democrats from forensic examinations by non-democrats after elections. Smartmatic provides election machines to US precincts and Smartmatic is closely connected to well-known biased leftists like George Soros.
 
Democrat voting machines are those manufactured by companies like Dominion which are run by leftists, operated by election officials controlled by Democrats, and protected by democrats from forensic examinations by non-democrats after elections. Smartmatic provides election machines to US precincts and Smartmatic is closely connected to well-known biased leftists like George Soros.
Nope
Machines are owned by government not parties
You are totally stupid
 
Nope
Machines are owned by government not parties
You are totally stupid
You lie because you know you have not disproved every point of what I said. The government may own the machines but the democrats do not allow non-democrats to examine them immediately after elections.
 
You lie because you know you have not disproved every point of what I said. The government may own the machines but the democrats do not allow non-democrats to examine them immediately after elections.
No it's not a lie to not disprove your claims lol
You make rocks look smart
 
You lie because you know you have not disproved every point of what I said. The government may own the machines but the democrats do not allow non-democrats to examine them immediately after elections.
Prove Democrats prevent lawful examinations, lying ******
 
Poor Mark does not even know what voting machines he is talking about. In FL, the voter fills out a paper ballot, and it is then scanned in the presence of the voter by an election judge. The machine is just a scanner. You could not make it scan for any candidates other than those selected by the voter in any way.

Voting machines have been used for generations with few problems. Then along comes Trump and all the meedia are fake, all the voting procedures are fake, why? Because the fat oaf did not win.
 
Prove Democrats prevent lawful examinations, lying ******
Michigan sheriff sought to seize multiple voting machines, records show (msn.com)

Michigan sheriff sought to seize multiple voting machines, records show

Reuters has previously reported that Leaf has been aided in his investigation by key Trump allies, but his efforts to get access to voting machines in the county have been blocked by state and federal judges who said he failed to provide credible evidence to support his claims that the equipment was rigged.
 
Poor Mark does not even know what voting machines he is talking about. In FL, the voter fills out a paper ballot, and it is then scanned in the presence of the voter by an election judge. The machine is just a scanner. You could not make it scan for any candidates other than those selected by the voter in any way.

Voting machines have been used for generations with few problems. Then along comes Trump and all the meedia are fake, all the voting procedures are fake, why? Because the fat oaf did not win.
Corruption in voting machines has been uncovered in machines for almost as long as Soros and his ilk have been manufaturing voting machines.

SequoiaSmartmaticReport61208.pdf (nist.gov) 6-12-08

31 The California examination also found, among other risks, that the Sequoia voting machines · “[A]llow the insertion of a Trojan program via a malicious USB removable storage media device that could modify ballot definitions and results. . . .”

32 · Are “designed to conduct Logic and Accuracy testing in a mode distinct from Election Day mode, which enables malicious firmware . . . to avoid operating in an incorrect manner while in testing mode.”

33 · Contain “a shell-like scripting language in the firmware . . . that could be coerced into performing malicious actions, in apparent violation of 2002 Voting System Standards . . . [and that] includes, among others, a command to set the protective counter of the machine . . .; a command that can be used to overwrite . . . the system firmware or audit trail; and a command to reboot the machine at will.”

34 · Permit “corrupted or malicious data injected into removable media . . . with potentially serious consequences including alteration of recorded votes, adding false results, and, under some conditions, causing damage to the election management system when the corrupted or malicious data is loaded for vote counting.”

35 On December 17, 2007, Colorado decertified the Sequoia Edge II and Edge II Plus for security reasons, which decision was effective immediately.”

36 Litigation in New Mexico after the 2004 presidential election produced an expert assessment of Sequoia and other brands of touch-screen voting systems which identified “undervotes” and “phantom votes,” in such numbers as to cast “serious doubt” on the 2004 presidential election result.

37 In 2006, during Pennsylvania state certification testing, thousands of votes changed on Sequoia Advantage voting ...
 
Corruption in voting machines has been uncovered in machines for almost as long as Soros and his ilk have been manufaturing voting machines.

SequoiaSmartmaticReport61208.pdf (nist.gov) 6-12-08

31 The California examination also found, among other risks, that the Sequoia voting machines · “[A]llow the insertion of a Trojan program via a malicious USB removable storage media device that could modify ballot definitions and results. . . .”

32 · Are “designed to conduct Logic and Accuracy testing in a mode distinct from Election Day mode, which enables malicious firmware . . . to avoid operating in an incorrect manner while in testing mode.”

33 · Contain “a shell-like scripting language in the firmware . . . that could be coerced into performing malicious actions, in apparent violation of 2002 Voting System Standards . . . [and that] includes, among others, a command to set the protective counter of the machine . . .; a command that can be used to overwrite . . . the system firmware or audit trail; and a command to reboot the machine at will.”

34 · Permit “corrupted or malicious data injected into removable media . . . with potentially serious consequences including alteration of recorded votes, adding false results, and, under some conditions, causing damage to the election management system when the corrupted or malicious data is loaded for vote counting.”

35 On December 17, 2007, Colorado decertified the Sequoia Edge II and Edge II Plus for security reasons, which decision was effective immediately.”

36 Litigation in New Mexico after the 2004 presidential election produced an expert assessment of Sequoia and other brands of touch-screen voting systems which identified “undervotes” and “phantom votes,” in such numbers as to cast “serious doubt” on the 2004 presidential election result.

37 In 2006, during Pennsylvania state certification testing, thousands of votes changed on Sequoia Advantage voting ...
Nothing about 2020 proven fraud lol
 
Werbung:
Back
Top