The law says you can not break down the dam. When the dam is there the water level is lower, to low to reach the pipes that feed the various farms. Yes that dam was on my family’s property but the law said you were not to break it down. Usually you just break it down anyways and the law looks the other way but this particular time the environmentalist group were there and it became an issue. Those crops failed and there was nothing my family could do about it. It also affected other farmers down the line. For what ever reason that beaver or that beaver’s family liked that spot to build his dam on. I am not mad at the beaver; he did what he was born to do. I am unhappy with the environmentalists who never even tried to see the farmer’s point of view. They were eventually going home to Portland and this was not going to affect them but it affected everyone in the line of the dam.
My family is not the only one; there are many cases out there. I have a friend in Washington state who has (I forget how many acres) they can not access, but they pay taxes on.
The spotted owl has totally destroyed Lane county (where I live) some people were able to get other jobs but mostly people had to leave, many lost their homes when the mills shut down. We still feel the effects of the spotted owl issue. I like the owl ok but what was done to (save it) was over board, stupid and dumb. All the rules about the owl were made by people who don’t even live around here. Our schools are still claiming they are suffering due to no lumber revenues.
There is a whole other side to this environmental issue that few see or talk about. And again it might not be an issue in Canada but here in America we grew up on the idea of personal property rights, it’s hard to give up a right once you have had it. If you spent a week seriously studying BOTH SIDES of this issue Nation wide, perhaps you would see it differently and if you didn’t, all I can say is thank God your Canadian