Another rigged election 'glitch' is caught in Nevada

[pjmret]

The problem with most evidence is that it was uncovered long after courts stopped thinking about looking at voting fraud evidence.

Conservative group claims mail-in fraud cost Trump 2020 election | Politics News (christianpost.com) 2-22-24

Conservative group claims widespread mail-in voter fraud cost Trump 2020 election

A conservative think tank claims that a recent survey conducted in partnership with Rasmussen Reports shows that over a quarter of Americans engaged in ballot fraud during the 2020 presidential election, drawing questions about the study's methodology.

The Heartland Institute released a report earlier this month claiming to show that widespread absentee ballot fraud in the 2020 election likely caused Republican incumbent Donald Trump to lose the presidential race. The report comes as Trump and some supporters have repeatedly claimed election fraud cost him the election in the last three years.

The highlighted findings included 21% of mail-in voters admitting that, in 2020, they voted in a state where they are "no longer a permanent resident," 21% admitting to filling out "a ballot for a friend or family member," 17% saying they "signed a ballot for a friend or family member 'with or without his or her permission,'" and 19% saying that a friend or family member "filled out their ballet, in part or in full, on their behalf."

When looking at "raw survey data," the researchers concluded that 28.2% of survey respondents "who voted by mail admitted to committing at least one kind of voter fraud."

courts are always open. duh.
you make such pathetic excuses for your failures lol.

 

[mark francis]

courts are always open. duh.
you make such pathetic excuses for your failures lol.

So? Courts have still not opted to examine voting fraud the way they have opted to examine everything about Trump for years, even going through his wife's underwear drawer, in efforts to find dirt to bury him with.

 

[pjmret]

So? Courts have still not opted to examine voting fraud the way they have opted to examine everything about Trump for years, even going through his wife's underwear drawer, in efforts to find dirt to bury him with.

so courts have done extensive investigations into trump in a way different than voting fraud?
you'll have to prove that.
but you wont.
you'll just either whine or deflect or run away cowardly


but again, courrts are always open for new evidence.
all you losers have is whining. lol

 

[mark francis]

so courts have done extensive investigations into trump in a way different than voting fraud?
you'll have to prove that.
but you wont.
you'll just either whine or deflect or run away cowardly


but again, courrts are always open for new evidence.
all you losers have is whining. lol

Radical leftist prosecutors and court judges have been going back through years of suspected Republican crimes while almost immediately forgiving and tabling the crimes of Democrats as soon as the crimes become public. Like James Comey forging Hillary before the FBI even looks into her mishandling of documents felony.

 

[pjmret]

Radical leftist prosecutors and court judges have been going back through years of suspected Republican crimes while almost immediately forgiving and tabling the crimes of Democrats as soon as the crimes become public. Like James Comey forging Hillary before the FBI even looks into her mishandling of documents felony.

View attachment 11666

right wing blather AND a cartoon. lol.

 

[pjmret]

Radical leftist prosecutors and court judges have been going back through years of suspected Republican crimes while almost immediately forgiving and tabling the crimes of Democrats as soon as the crimes become public. Like James Comey forging Hillary before the FBI even looks into her mishandling of documents felony.

View attachment 11666

why haven't you right wing whiners taken your evidence to court lately?
you keep ignoring that question.
courts are always open for new evidence. duh

 

[mark francis]

why haven't you right wing whiners taken your evidence to court lately?
you keep ignoring that question.
courts are always open for new evidence. duh

Take my advice. Don't expect leftist courts to be honest about Democrat corruption.

 

[pjmret]

Take my advice. Don't expect leftist courts to be honest about Democrat corruption.

do "leftist courts" include those in red states and those with trump appointed judges?
take my advice, you should make more intelligent posts. Not that I think that's possible for you

 

[mark francis]

do "leftist courts" include those in red states and those with trump appointed judges?
take my advice, you should make more intelligent posts. Not that I think that's possible for you

Yes. Some Republican appointed judges are just as likely to be bent toward the wicked world as are Democrats.

 

[pjmret]

Yes. Some Republican appointed judges are just as likely to be bent toward the wicked world as are Democrats.

They are just as likely? Lol

Red state courts are leftist?
You say the dumbest things lol

 

[mark francis]

They are just as likely? Lol

Red state courts are leftist?
You say the dumbest things lol

Leftism and liberalism are not clearly divided between political parties. While more Democrats tend to be anti-Christian and most Republicans tend to be pro-Christian not all political activists are as clearly divided.

 

[pjmret]

Leftism and liberalism are not clearly divided between political parties. While more Democrats tend to be anti-Christian and most Republicans tend to be pro-Christian not all political activists are as clearly divided.

so in other words you're just whining, with no actual facts to prove that somehow every single court case that you lost was due to a biased judge.

you're just making excuses for losing. lol

 

[mark francis]

so in other words you're just whining, with no actual facts to prove that somehow every single court case that you lost was due to a biased judge.

you're just making excuses for losing. lol

No voting fraud cases have been lost since more complete investigations were completed that all but proved widespread Democrat voting fraud in 2020.

 

[pjmret]

No voting fraud cases have been lost since more complete investigations were completed that all but proved widespread Democrat voting fraud in 2020.

which voting fraud cases have been won? lol. maybe none have been lost since you haven't had any? lol.

that's as stupid as saying you've never lost a lottery if you never played. duh.

if they "all but proved" them you should have rushed to courts..but you didnt
guess they didn't "all but prove" them. duh
and.."all but proved" is not the same thing as "proved", legal incompetent. lol

 

[mark francis]

which voting fraud cases have been won? lol. maybe none have been lost since you haven't had any? lol.

that's as stupid as saying you've never lost a lottery if you never played. duh.

if they "all but proved" them you should have rushed to courts..but you didnt
guess they didn't "all but prove" them. duh

Some cases did not go well with the looting and lying voting fraud denying crowd but for the most part courts have been cowed into avoiding voting fraud cases by the overwhelming popular delusion that voting fraud is a lie and should not be examined in court or elsewhere.