If that's the case, then they have less rights to be there than their more continuously-occupying neighbors...who are many christians...and logically the ones we, as a predominantly christian nation, should be behind..the palestinians.
Huh? Jews have ALWAYS been in Palestine since they came out of Eqypt, and briefly before that. They were there during the Babylonians, the Romans, the Byzantine, the Crusaders, Mamluk, Ottoman, and finely modern Israel. They have always been there. There was never a time between the acient Israel, and the modern one, that Jews have not lived in Palestine.
Further, even the non-Jewish occupations were not continuous by any stretch, and very few were "christian". This is another strange claim of yours.
Christianity was legalized, and you might say nationalized, in Rome in 391 A.D. So prior to that, all non-jewish occupation could NOT be "christian". The "Christian" Byzantine empire only lasted until 630 A.D. For the math impaired, that is 239 Years.
Now from 638 A.D., until 1917 A.D, the Palestine area was ruled by a list of different Islamic leadership. That is 1279 years, minus a brief rule by the Crusaders from 1099 to 1187. That's 88 years. So Islam has ruled for 1191 years, and Christians ruled for 327 years. And in either case, it wasn't continuous.
Now, as to which we as a Christian nation should support, in Genesis 12:2-3, G-d says he will make of Abraham descendants into a great nation, and the he will make Israel a blessing, and he will bless them that bless Israel, and curse them that curse Israel.
I believe this prophecy is fulfilled and being fulfilled. Logically, if we are a Christian nation, we should want to be blessed and not cursed, and I thus support G-ds chosen people in the land he so chooses.
Further, in Joel 3:1-3, G-d says he will restore the fortunes of Israel, and bring the nations for judgement for dividing up his land.
The first prophecy I believe is fulfilled. The second, I believe is in continuous effect. Again, logically we we're a Christian nation, we should be against doing something that will cause judgement to fall on us, and not support anyone but Israel in Palestine.
Jews are not jews from ancestory any more than christians are christians from ancestory. You either ascribe to the faith or you don't. I, for instance, could become a jew if I studied the Torah, passed the hebrew lessons and was formally inducted into a temple. The jewish guy I dated spoke with me about this. So even though I'm not of some long lineage of jewish people (although one or two of my ancestors happend to practice judiasm), I still could be a jew.
I don't understand this. I admit it completely, you have me lost. Are you saying that Jewish people don't identify themselves as Jewish from ancestry? Because I know some Jews personally, that know exactly which of the 12 tribes of Israel they are from, and can trace their linage right back to ancient Israel.
So faith is the determining factor. Andy, you like to jump around on both sides of the fence with this one. On the one hand you tell us to excuse the "jews" that are bombing on the Sabbath..due to some human-made technicality. Yahweh did not make an 11th Commandment that said: "Oh, by the way, if these first 10 don't suit you, you can ad-lib." The Ten Commandments are held higher than any else of the lesser and many insist: human ad-libbed laws. Then when that argument sinks in you flip over to 'well it doesn't matter because the bombers are secular jews.
Actually yes I do. I believe that Israel has a secular and historic, as well as a religious claim to the land. So I tend to argue this specific issue from a number of different view points.
First, I don't tell you to excuse anything. I am simply stating the fact that Judaism does not condemn military actions on any specific day. As to whether you believe that, matters not. I know that convincing you on a issue related to a faith you do not believe in, is pointless and a waste.
Since you do not have faith in the belief system, you can change and twist it to whatever ends you want. Whereas, a true believer in Yahweh will submit to meaning Yahweh gives it.
As such, your attempt to translate one command (not to murder) over another command (to take the land of Israel) is something that could only be done by a non-believer. A believer would research to find the meaning, and realize one deals with individual actions, and the other deals with national actions, and neither is to be over written by the other.
No, they're not jews if they are secular any more than someone who is secular is also, simultaneously christian. I once heard this extremely hedonistic woman I know, who used to be devout christian, say "you either live by the rules or you don't." She proudly waved the flag of "don't". And I remember my respect for her actually climbing instead of sinking because of how many "christians" I know who warm pews and then go back home the other 6 days of the week and do as bad as she did, or worse, but were sure they were "saved" (and therefore hypocritically judgmental of others) because of going through the motions of "being faithful".
Sort of like an ex-president who walked in and out of church every Sunday with a massive Bible, but lied constantly about everything, and was sleeping with nearly every female within range his entire two terms.
You either follow the Ten Commandments or you don't. You are either a jew, or you're not.
I believe they do follow the Ten Commandments as they are intended, not as you have twisted them. I still disagree with being a Jew is limited to religious matters.