From what I've read of your, there's no doubt that you are a liberal.
Because I don't cotton to gun-dummies? We've discussed very little except guns and violence so maybe you're just suffering from premature assumption.
Oh, so you find something amusing about people who take their responsibilities for firearms safety and proficiency? As far as people who don't have and maintain their proficiency with weapons, I hold them in total contempt, because they are intentionally failing to meet their fiduciary responsibilities as an American citizen.
It's not the proficiency that amuses me, it's the macho braggadocio. I'm 60 years old, I've never needed to kill anybody nor carry a gun for protection. How many times have you fired your weapon in anger or in an emergency? You talk like you have to kill felons and druggies several times a week. Most policemen go through their whole service and never fire their gun at anybody, so how desperately do you need one?
As far as this discussion is concerned, religion is a total non sequitur. You mentioned it to try to get the discussion going in some other direction, and it's not going to happen. Religion has NO part in a discussion of the 2nd Amendment.
It's often good to bring ethics/morality/philosophy into discussions because it allows me to learn a bit more about the person with whom I am discussing. Your position speaks volumes about you.
It's been my experience that only women and gays try to make comparisons about weapons and genitals. I have no idea where that silly little game got started, but it's as stupid now as it it's ever been. As far as your aversion to "potty mouth", if you honestly feel that way then I'm calling BS on your claim to own, or for that matter, to have ever worked anywhere near the construction industry.
You're right about one thing, macho men don't go around admitting that they are using their guns as penis substitutes, many of them don't even realize it themselves, and the ones who do know it stop doing it or pretend they don't know.
I'm sorry to be the one to mention this to you, Bob, but THIS isn't a construction site, this is a DISCUSSION site. Lots of things go on at construction sites that have no place in a discussion. An inability to speak without profanity indicates that one is a verbal cripple. Mark Twain said that swear words should be treated like the American flag, kept folded up in the bottom dresser drawer and only brought out and unfurled in all their glory on special occasions.
You don't know anything about me Mare, but I've already figured you out.
I don't know much about you, but you know all about me? Just another symptom of a tumescent ego, eh?
You're yet another in a long line of liberal, sit around in a circle-jerk singing Kumbya, and wishing for everyone to be nice, oh yeah, and don't forget world peace. You're also jealous as hell because every man in your life has been nothing but a limp-dicked metro-sexual gutless pansy and you just WISH that you'd found a real man who would even have anything to do with you!
Oh my, Bob, you have no idea how off the mark you are. Real men don't have to strut and pontificate.
No it doesn't. ANYONE can be "compassionate, kind, loving, and forgiving", especially when they live in a country that was built, and is protected by men who had the REAL courage to pick up a weapon and go face down those who are trying to kill you, your family, and your countrymen. To me, a weapon is no different than a hammer or a saw, it's a tool that is designed and used for a specific purpose, and just like a hammer and a saw, it takes time, and practice to become and remain proficient in their use. Do you want people building YOUR house who don't know what their doing with their tools? Do you want someone riding a patrol through your neighborhood who doesn't know how to properly use his weapon? No, morons like you denigrate those who do what you yourself are incapable of, and make fun of them to cover for your own inadequacies, and it's pathetic.
It's called "rock logic" as opposed to "water logic", an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, for more than 10,000 years we have been practicing this archaic Might is Right philosophy, and what has it gotten us? Empires rise and fall, the tough guy of today is tomorrow's corpse, someday we have to learn to get along with each other and that is far more difficult than blasting away with guns. The men and women who patrol our neighborhood are hired to do that, trained to deal with the public as non-violently as possible and they do not stut around like little Napoleons on discussion sites.
I suppose we could continue this meeting of the Mutual Admiration Society, but what's the point? Would you still be able to be a man if you didn't have guns? You accuse me of making fun of the people who protect us and that's not true, I respect them. It's the little men with big guns, bragging in public, calling other people names, denigrating women and gay people as being lacking in value because they don't behave like you do. Come back and talk to me about my "pathetic inadequacies" after you have spent 23 hours in child-birth. All the guns in the world won't make anyone a man.