I don't have to. The fact 60 cases were presented to judges, including those appointed by Trump, found no reason for the cases to continue. That means no fraud dickhead.
You think I look up to LBJ? Lol
60 cases went to judges and not a one of them was able to get any info on the number of fake ballots that were cast by Democrat/Dominion/Soros voting machines.
They never asked for them nor was that an issue with the submissions. They were worthless and had no evidence to support their claim. It was all bluster and bullshyt and you're still belching the same like lava. Grow up.
So, you say 60 judges never asked for evidence that the voting machines had not been seriously corrupted. So how did the courts know the machines did not submit thousands of fake ballots for Biden?
That's correct. They read the submission presented to them and rightly assume that is the best evidence available. Furthermore, because the machines were proven to not be corrupted,contrary to the bullshyt you spread and fox being fined, that would only make it worse for Trump. You dont think real deep.
They were tested by GOP Hawks. How did you know they did submit votes for Biden? You don't. You fabricated that to suit you pathetic revenge.
So the judges looked over what they were presented and decided there was insufficient data to rule conclusively on the evidence of fraud.
Democrats can claim they might not have benefitted from the fraud, but they cannot claim the election was not tainted by the fraud that nobody knows who benefitted from.
Nobody benefits from fraud and all Americans suffer when officials cover up fraud and obstruct fraud investigations.
You may now continue having sex with corpses
more vague blather. lol
That's correct. There was no fraud.
Democrats have claimed nothing just the result. You keep banging in with garbage. Knock yourself out son. You lost ..
You are being vague. Did the courts say they found no evidence of fraud or that they found evidence to show there had been no fraud? Do you understand the difference?
Democrats who claim courts found evidence that proved no significant fraud occurred in 2020 are lying.
you keep saying that stupidity. lol.
Finding no evidence of fraud could be because investigators were incompetent. But that is not what Democrats need. What Democrats need is evidence from investigations they blocked that could have supported their contention that no significant fraud occurred.you keep saying that stupidity. lol.
you morons found no credible evidence of fraud.
you were morons then, and you are morons now
