Abortion

[Mare Tranquillity]

I have to disagree. He is an outstanding example of how Christan beliefs make for a finer human being. But humanity will not have suffer him indefinitely; he loves himself so much that at some point, he will try to kiss his own behind and likely break his own neck. In any event, I am done with him. I am going back to debating with his twin, "always".

To what do you disagree?

Here's an interesting article about abortion worldwide.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8305217.stm

 

[palerider]

You have more twists and dodges than the court fool. When you say you like it when people "slink away", obviously you never consider that they have become tired of your continual dodges. I give up. I am not slinking away; I have just arrived at the same conclusion as others who have left. It is pointless to continue in the face of your continued denials.

This is a new twist. Travel so far away from the subject on an irrelavent tangent that the real issue can no longer be seen, and then throw a hissy fit and claim you are not running away while never even coming close to rationally defending your position.

I asked you for proof of your claim and the best you could do is the statement from a room under the stairs full of moonbats. What do you expect.

 

[palerider]

Despite your attempt to discredit the University, by characterizing it as "dedicated to the exploration of parapsychological phenomena",

My attempt to discredit them? It is their mission statement. They discredit themselves. I am surprised they would put it in writing and post it on the internet. I suppose they read tarrot cards as well.

 

[palerider]

Do you speak for the scientific community? Or is it just the opinion of some "moonbat" who has concluded that humans have such a thing as "souls"?

Of course I don't. The fact that the scientific "community" isn't speaking on the issue, and haven't is evidence enough. Your room full of moonbats hardly represent the scientific community. Perhaps the red headed stepchild of a distant cousin of the scientific community, but not the scientific community itself.

Given the unscientific belief in souls, now you choose to make declarations as to scientific definitions. Such unashamed arrogance

You, like many pro choicers, mistake science for faith. A person can believe as they wish, but to argue a belief, with no proof is an article of faith and does not represent a rational argument. I would never state flatly that souls exist or that they were fact and try to suppor the argument. Scientific definitions and faith are two different things.

 

[palerider]

I have to disagree. He is an outstanding example of how Christan beliefs make for a finer human being. But humanity will not have suffer him indefinitely; he loves himself so much that at some point, he will try to kiss his own behind and likely break his own neck. In any event, I am done with him. I am going back to debating with his twin, "always".

I love impotent insults. The purest evidence that you have given up all pretense of defending your position and are now simply attempting to save some face before your retreat, and you will take whatever face you can get without regard to how paltry it may be. And then to grumble about it, in public, to another poster....priceless.

 

[Dante the Marxist]

Source?

You are saying you have never seen a chicken with its head cut off?

 

[Dante the Marxist]

Because this government was instituted. and charged by law, to protect human rights and the right to live is at the top of the list.

Then let the government have the non sentients, and see how they like being forced to care for them.

 

[palerider]

Then let the government have the non sentients, and see how they like being forced to care for them.

So I was right initially in my assessment that you are completely unable to rationally defend your position. Again, completely unsurprising.

And you aren't even good at "cute" by way of covering up your failure.

 

[dahermit]

I love impotent insults. The purest evidence that you have given up all pretense of defending your position and are now simply attempting to save some face before your retreat, and you will take whatever face you can get without regard to how paltry it may be. And then to grumble about it, in public, to another poster....priceless.

You get the last word. It seems that is very important to you.

 

[palerider]

You get the last word. It seems that is very important to you.

Nah, I could care less about the last word. What is important to me is proving that you can't rationally defend your position.

 

[Zylstra]

I*evasion*

So you can't demonstrate that you know what each person on Earth thinks?

I have no idea what you are getting at. Is english your second language?

I'll take that as a 'Yes, Zylstra, my posts are irrelevant'

By the way, it is liberalism that is blatantly racist.

:lol:

And how is an ideology built on individualistic idealism racist?

Affirmative action for example, what could possibly be more racist than to suggest that blacks need special favors because they just can't make it on their own?

AA is not based on liberal principles

Try again

Which part of the constitution supports slavery?

Slavery was recognized and protected for a period of time before any attempts to get rid of it could be made.

 

[Zylstra]

You are saying you have never seen a chicken with its head cut off?

And that demonstrates that burning it beforehand doesn't register as pain how?

non sequitur, Dante. i expected better of you.

 

[Zylstra]

Can PR provide any non-religious reason to condemn abortion as a "bad thing"?

 

[Dante the Marxist]

So I was right initially in my assessment that you are completely unable to rationally defend your position. Again, completely unsurprising.

And you aren't even good at "cute" by way of covering up your failure.

In the course of this thread, you have not produced any evidence for your position. At least I have a good reason, if not hard evidence.

 

[Dante the Marxist]

And that demonstrates that burning it beforehand doesn't register as pain how?

non sequitur, Dante. i expected better of you.

sorry...but its true.