Why did Obama…

Werbung:
Yep, those 2 mental midgets seem to THINK that we can dictate to other countries what & how to manage their international flights...
Yeah...I guess they miss the good ol' days....when Sheriff Georgie was shootin'-his-mouth-off....

bush_littlebigman.jpg


.....and, developing so-many close international-relationships!!!

massage.JPG
 
Americans did pull together after 9-11. Where in the hell were you?

Even most all Liberals gave the President the benefit of the doubt and voted his way.


Note your phrasing. You admit that most liberals blamed GWB for 9-11.
 
Yep, those 2 mental midgets seem to THINK that we can dictate to other countries what & how to manage their international flights

The airplane in question was bound for the U.S. so you’re damned right we have some say in how Nigeria conducts its international flights. Furthermore, wasn’t the airplane from a U.S. owned airline? What makes you think a U.S. company is exempt from U.S. law just because it does business in another country?
 
The airplane in question was bound for the U.S. so you’re damned right we have some say in how Nigeria conducts its international flights. Furthermore, wasn’t the airplane from a U.S. owned airline? What makes you think a U.S. company is exempt from U.S. law just because it does business in another country?

OHHHHH, good Christian you said a naughty word ;)

Maybe you need to take your belligerent attitude to Nigeria and then right along to Amsterdam and explain all of that righteous B.S. to their government directly:rolleyes: You know...that wonderful little 'mental dribble' about U.S. LAW. Yipper SKIPPY, you just keep opening that orifice and putting both of your feet squarely into that huge opening :cool:
 
OHHHHH, good Christian you said a naughty word ;)

Maybe you need to take your belligerent attitude to Nigeria and then right along to Amsterdam and explain all of that righteous B.S. to their government directly:rolleyes: You know...that wonderful little 'mental dribble' about U.S. LAW. Yipper SKIPPY, you just keep opening that orifice and putting both of your feet squarely into that huge opening :cool:

What on earth are you babbling about? What makes you think the U.S. does not have the right to regulate aircraft that are bound for its sovereign territory?
 
What on earth are you babbling about? What makes you think the U.S. does not have the right to regulate aircraft that are bound for its sovereign territory?


He seems to think there is no sense of mutually beneficial reward here. Can't imagine why.
 
We may be able to regulate the aircraft, especially since it belongs to a company based in the US, but can we really regulate airport security in Nigeria?
 
What on earth are you babbling about? What makes you think the U.S. does not have the right to regulate aircraft that are bound for its sovereign territory?
Flaja BABBLING:
What makes you think a U.S. company is exempt from U.S. law just because it does business in another country?

Watch LIST / DO NOT FLY LIST...2 separate LISTS...not all airport scanners/Homeland Security People are expected to do every procedure the exact same way {that surprise element/not to be functioning in the same method at each and every airport} AND AGAIN I ASK THE ALL KNOWING ONE...WHAT U.S. LAW ARE YOU BABBLING ABOUT :confused:
Come, pull one of those feet out of that orifice and explain that statement ;)
 
And you libs didn’t say the same thing about GWB and 9-11?
Americans did pull together after 9-11. Where in the hell were you?
Patience....patience....we are tryin' to straighten-out a newbie, here; A Disciple of Absolutes (worst of all.)​

Even most all Liberals gave the President the benefit of the doubt and voted his way. But when the tally of lies rendered mounted, finally, all the way to at least 935... people had every right, actually responsibility, to change direction.
I guess we've gotta roll-out The List......again!! :rolleyes:

(Not to mention the handful of variations.
323.png
)​
 
just imagine running a airport...and having to have it meet every standard of every nation that used it...all at once....

Excellent point, POCKET...but Flaja keeps screeching it's the U.S. LAW, so I'm kinda curious what this 'religious right winged nut job' thinks/ASSumes/knows about the LAW and exactly what LAW that would be;)
 
The airplane in question was bound for the U.S. so you’re damned right we have some say in how Nigeria conducts its international flights.
Not to worry....we've got close-ties with Nigeria!!!
April 2006

"It is hardly surprising, then, that since 9/11 the Bush administration has courted Nigeria as an alternative to volatile petro-states in the Middle East and Latin America. In 2002, the White House declared the oil of Africa (five other countries on the continent are also key producers) a "strategic national interest"—meaning that the United States would use military force, if necessary, to protect it. In short, Nigeria's troubles could become America's and, like those of the Persian Gulf, cost us dearly in blood and money."

 
OHHHHH, good Christian you said a naughty word ;)

Maybe you need to take your belligerent attitude to Nigeria and then right along to Amsterdam and explain all of that righteous B.S. to their government directly:rolleyes: You know...that wonderful little 'mental dribble' about U.S. LAW. Yipper SKIPPY, you just keep opening that orifice and putting both of your feet squarely into that huge opening :cool:
No doubt!

Priority-ONE (regarding Nigeria) should be SEND IN THE MISSIONARIES!!!!!!

:rolleyes:
 
Werbung:
What on earth are you babbling about? What makes you think the U.S. does not have the right to regulate aircraft that are bound for its sovereign territory?
Ah, yes....that good ol' All-American-Option...Attack The SYMPTOMS (rather-than dealing with the SOURCE of The Problem!!!!!)

:rolleyes:


*

(Pretty inconvenient, looking beyond The Rhetoric....HUH??!!!!)

:mad:
 
Back
Top