What inviolate election procedures are in place to guarantee illegals are not voting? None?

[pjmret]

Any election in which evidence of substantial fraud is not investigated to uncover and remove the invalid ballots can never be said to be irrefutably accurate or honest.

there is no CREDIBLE evidence of SUBSTANTIAL fraud.
so you lose again. lol

 

[mark francis]

there is no CREDIBLE evidence of SUBSTANTIAL fraud.
so you lose again. lol

Nobody will know how substantial the fraud was until investigations root out all the invalid ballots, regardless of how many that turns out to be, and removes those illegitimate ballots from the total.

 

[pjmret]

Nobody will know how substantial the fraud was until investigations root out all the invalid ballots, regardless of how many that turns out to be, and removes those illegitimate ballots from the total.

investigations happened and found nothing.
we know you morons lost eveyr court case

 

[mark francis]

investigations happened and found nothing.
we know you morons lost eveyr court case

What are you saying, that investigators were unable to discover approximately how many illegal votes were cast in 2020? In that case nobody can honestly claim the 2020 election was proven accurate and legitimate.

 

[pjmret]

What are you saying, that investigators were unable to discover approximately how many illegal votes were cast in 2020? In that case nobody can honestly claim the 2020 election was proven accurate and legitimate.

you can't understand what i'm saying?
no surprise.
nobody can honestly say any election was proven accurate.
god you're stupid. lol

 

[Boris Norris]

You claim the evidence is shrinking but you are mistaken. There never was any evidence that supports Democrat claims that they committed no significant fraud in 2020.

Exactly. There's no evidence of it even when the GOP puts the dogs on them. 60+ court cases and not one got traction.
There's a pattern forming there. Stick with your Bible son.

 

[mark francis]

Exactly. There's no evidence of it even when the GOP puts the dogs on them. 60+ court cases and not one got traction.
There's a pattern forming there. Stick with your Bible son.

What does "60 cases" have to do with anything? Were you expecting 60 judges to declare that voting machines nobody ever examined were found to have been completely free from fraud in 2020?

 

[Boris Norris]

What does "60 cases" have to do with anything? Were you expecting 60 judges to declare that voting machines nobody ever examined were found to have been completely free from fraud in 2020?

No. They didn't examine voter machines. You're out of your tree.
You know exactly what happened. Stop playing dumber than you are.

 

[mark francis]

No. They didn't examine voter machines. You're out of your tree.
You know exactly what happened. Stop playing dumber than you are.

That's the whole point. No reputable investigators had examined the machines immediately after the election to verify the machines had not been corrupted, so Democrats who claim investigators proved the machines had not been corrupted are lying.

 

[pjmret]

That's the whole point. No reputable investigators had examined the machines immediately after the election to verify the machines had not been corrupted, so Democrats who claim investigators proved the machines had not been corrupted are lying.

arizona did and found nothing.
why do you keep lying. lol

 

[mark francis]

arizona did and found nothing.
why do you keep lying. lol

NO. There was no unhindered extensive examination of voting machines in Arizona. Whoever told you that is lying.

 

[pjmret]

NO. There was no unhindered extensive examination of voting machines in Arizona. Whoever told you that is lying.

who hindered the republican investigation in arizona? name them.

 

[mark francis]

who hindered the republican investigation in arizona? name them.

Arizona officials hired a voting machine investigation organization approved by Dominion and Democrats to do a shallow evaluation of the voting machines used in 2020. The investigation was incomplete, less than thorough, and ostensibly biased. No, Democrats did not allow independent forensics investigators hired by Republicans to examine the Democrats carefully controlled and monitored voting machines.

 

[pjmret]

Arizona officials hired a voting machine investigation organization approved by Dominion and Democrats to do a shallow evaluation of the voting machines used in 2020. The investigation was incomplete, less than thorough, and ostensibly biased. No, Democrats did not allow independent forensics investigators hired by Republicans to examine the Democrats carefully controlled and monitored voting machines.

arizona republicans hired their own investigators, legal moron.
democrats had nothing to do with the investigation.

you are a pathetic lying moron. lol

 

[mark francis]

arizona republicans hired their own investigators, legal moron.
democrats had nothing to do with the investigation.

you are a pathetic lying moron. lol

For whatever reason forensics experts were denied access to the voting machines for an assortment of reasons given by officials who denied without evidence that the machines had been fraudulently manipulated. It there was no fraud to be found then why all the "fighting like hell" to prevent top investigators from examining the machines to prove they had not been corrupted?