What inviolate election procedures are in place to guarantee illegals are not voting? None?

[Boris Norris]

The evidence for fraud is massive. That is why Democrats continue to lie and "fight like hell" to prevent election security measures and obstruct voter fraud investigations.

If it's massive it should be easy to post.

 

[mark francis]

The evidence for fraud is massive. That is why Democrats continue to lie and "fight like hell" to prevent election security measures and obstruct voter fraud investigations.

Democrats have been stealing elections for decades. This one was in 1996 where illegal immigrants played a key role:

Inquiry Finds Possible Illegal Ballots Cast in Upset of Dornan - The New York Times (nytimes.com) 2-16-97


Inquiry Finds Possible Illegal Ballots Cast in Upset of Dornan

​

Feb. 16, 1997

See the article in its original context from February 16, 1997, Section 1, Page 37Buy Reprints

New York Times subscribers* enjoy full access to TimesMachine—view over 150 years of New York Times journalism, as it originally appeared.​

Four months after the November election, state and Orange County investigators are still looking into charges by former Representative Robert K. Dornan that voter fraud sealed his narrow defeat at the polls.

While the inquiry has so far uncovered dozens of potentially illegal ballots, it is unclear whether there are enough to make up for the 984-vote loss by Mr. Dornan, a Republican, to Loretta Sanchez, a Democrat.

Much of the attention is being focused on voters registered by Hermandad Mexicana Nacional, a local Hispanic rights group. A survey by The Los Angeles Times showed that the organization helped register 172 noncitizens who later voted in the Dornan-Sanchez contest.

''No one can seriously argue any more that there wasn't voter fraud in this election,'' said Michael Schroeder, Mr. Dornan's lawyer and vice president of the state Republican committee. ''It was pervasive.''
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
This is from the Congressional Record, proof of illegals voting in the 1996 election:

House Report 105-416 - DISMISSING THE ELECTION CONTEST AGAINST LORETTA SANCHEZ (govinfo.gov) 2-12-98

In December, 1996 California Secretary of State Bill Jones

announced that his office would begin an investigation into

allegations of voter fraud in the November 1996 elections held

in Orange County, California. With the initial cooperation of

the INS's Los Angeles district office, the Secretary of State

announced on April 9, 1997 that of 1,100 persons enrolled in

Hermandad citizenship classes, 490 documented non-citizens had

registered to vote in CA 46. Of these, 303 actually voted

illegally in CA 46, and 69 individuals had no record in INS

files. On September 15, 1997 the Committee wrote to the

California Secretary of State, in his capacity as the chief

election officer of the State of California, to request that he

review and verify the results of the Committee's voter

analysis. One month later, the Secretary of State confirmed

which of the individuals identified by the Committee as non-

citizens had voted in the November 1996 election.

 

[pjmret]

The evidence for fraud is massive. That is why Democrats continue to lie and "fight like hell" to prevent election security measures and obstruct voter fraud investigations.

no proof.
you are such a liar. lol.

 

[pjmret]

Democrats have been stealing elections for decades. This one was in 1996 where illegal immigrants played a key role:

Inquiry Finds Possible Illegal Ballots Cast in Upset of Dornan - The New York Times (nytimes.com) 2-16-97


Inquiry Finds Possible Illegal Ballots Cast in Upset of Dornan

​

Feb. 16, 1997

See the article in its original context from February 16, 1997, Section 1, Page 37Buy Reprints

New York Times subscribers* enjoy full access to TimesMachine—view over 150 years of New York Times journalism, as it originally appeared.​

Four months after the November election, state and Orange County investigators are still looking into charges by former Representative Robert K. Dornan that voter fraud sealed his narrow defeat at the polls.

While the inquiry has so far uncovered dozens of potentially illegal ballots, it is unclear whether there are enough to make up for the 984-vote loss by Mr. Dornan, a Republican, to Loretta Sanchez, a Democrat.

Much of the attention is being focused on voters registered by Hermandad Mexicana Nacional, a local Hispanic rights group. A survey by The Los Angeles Times showed that the organization helped register 172 noncitizens who later voted in the Dornan-Sanchez contest.

''No one can seriously argue any more that there wasn't voter fraud in this election,'' said Michael Schroeder, Mr. Dornan's lawyer and vice president of the state Republican committee. ''It was pervasive.''
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
This is from the Congressional Record, proof of illegals voting in the 1996 election:

House Report 105-416 - DISMISSING THE ELECTION CONTEST AGAINST LORETTA SANCHEZ (govinfo.gov) 2-12-98

In December, 1996 California Secretary of State Bill Jones

announced that his office would begin an investigation into

allegations of voter fraud in the November 1996 elections held

in Orange County, California. With the initial cooperation of

the INS's Los Angeles district office, the Secretary of State

announced on April 9, 1997 that of 1,100 persons enrolled in

Hermandad citizenship classes, 490 documented non-citizens had

registered to vote in CA 46. Of these, 303 actually voted

illegally in CA 46, and 69 individuals had no record in INS

files. On September 15, 1997 the Committee wrote to the

California Secretary of State, in his capacity as the chief

election officer of the State of California, to request that he

review and verify the results of the Committee's voter

analysis. One month later, the Secretary of State confirmed

which of the individuals identified by the Committee as non-

citizens had voted in the November 1996 election.

"possible"... lol.
and who did these "possible voters" vote for
you morons assume its democrats..wthout proof, as always

 

[mark francis]

no proof.
you are such a liar. lol.

Not only has the evidence of fraud not been proven in court but neither has it been disproven in court. Democrats are only one side of the equation, meaning they cannot claim there was insignificant fraud without any effort to debunk the evidence of fraud.

 

[mark francis]

"possible"... lol.
and who did these "possible voters" vote for
you morons assume its democrats..wthout proof, as always

One of the excuses Democrats have used when confronted with massive illegal immigrant voting due to lax enforcement of election laws is that nobody knows who the illegals voted for, thus allowing elections with significant numbers of illegal votes to stand. Democrats show their protection for voting fraud by registering illegals and refusing to provide proof Democrats are not being crookedly advantaged by illegal voting. As long as Democrats refuse to purge their voting registries and refuse to support security measures such as voter IDs they prove they are corrupt and should not be trusted to run fair elections.

 

[pjmret]

Not only has the evidence of fraud not been proven in court but neither has it been disproven in court. Democrats are only one side of the equation, meaning they cannot claim there was insignificant fraud without any effort to debunk the evidence of fraud.

Courts don't disprove things, legal moron

 

[pjmret]

One of the excuses Democrats have used when confronted with massive illegal immigrant voting due to lax enforcement of election laws is that nobody knows who the illegals voted for, thus allowing elections with significant numbers of illegal votes to stand. Democrats show their protection for voting fraud by registering illegals and refusing to provide proof Democrats are not being crookedly advantaged by illegal voting. As long as Democrats refuse to purge their voting registries and refuse to support security measures such as voter IDs they prove they are corrupt and should not be trusted to run fair elections.

Right w8ng blather

 

[mark francis]

Courts don't disprove things, legal moron

Of course courts cannot prove the Democrats did not steal the election because courts are powerless to refute facts of fraud that nobody can refute.

 

[pjmret]

Of course courts cannot prove the Democrats did not steal the election because courts are powerless to refute facts of fraud that nobody can refute.

Of course because that's not how courts work
Just like they can't prove Trump did not steal thec2016 election
Or any election
Only an election moron like you would keep bringing that up lol

 

[mark francis]

Of course because that's not how courts work
Just like they can't prove Trump did not steal thec2016 election
Or any election
Only an election moron like you would keep bringing that up lol

Yada yada yada. Democrats stole the election and their hopes of getting away with it lies in the unlikelihood that anyone will ever be able to come up with the time and money required to examine the records thoroughly to tell us just how many illegitimate votes were cast by dead people, illegal immigrants, double voters, fake voters, and corruptible voting machines.

Lefties are suing Republicans for challenging the 2020 vote count the Democrats have never even tried to prove was accurate. That is wicked and every leftist politician, news person, and bootlick who supports the lawsuits against Americans for questioning the unverified election results is totally unjust.

 

[pjmret]

Yada yada yada. Democrats stole the election and their hopes of getting away with it lies in the unlikelihood that anyone will ever be able to come up with the time and money required to examine the records thoroughly to tell us just how many illegitimate votes were cast by dead people, illegal immigrants, double voters, fake voters, and corruptible voting machines.

Lefties are suing Republicans for challenging the 2020 vote count the Democrats have never even tried to prove was accurate. That is wicked and every leftist politician, news person, and bootlick who supports the lawsuits against Americans for questioning the unverified election results is totally unjust.

Which lawsuit is wicked ? Lol
Which lawsuit was about questioning?
Name specifics instead of blather

 

[mark francis]

Which lawsuit is wicked ? Lol
Which lawsuit was about questioning?
Name specifics instead of blather

Anyone claiming Trump is trying to overthrow a legitimate election is lying by hiding the fact that nobody has yet proven the election was legitimate.

 

[pjmret]

Anyone claiming Trump is trying to overthrow a legitimate election is lying by hiding the fact that nobody has yet proven the election was legitimate.

name something specific.
all you do is vague whining. lol

 

[mark francis]

name something specific.
all you do is vague whining. lol

Anyone claiming any American is trying to overthrow a US election that has been proven was not stolen by fraud is lying because the 2020 election has never been proven to have been without significant voting fraud.