Did he get frequent flyer miles And a bag of nuts ?

[mark francis]

"mysterious" is not a fact, moron, but an opinion. lol.

why didn't trump's doj go after them for all those murders? oh because it just another stupid conspiracy theory

The deaths are a matter of public record, not a fake conspiracy theory like leftists stupidly and dishonestly claim.

 

[mark francis]

no, but the analysis that was done on the paper does. duh.

No, criticizing the paper does not substitute as a refutation of the facts listed in the peer-reviewed report.

 

[pjmret]

Pointing out that leftist media outlets refuse to share the peer-reviewed report does not disprove it's facts and conclusions.

Why isn't it all over fox moron?
Or 8n courts moron?

 

[pjmret]

The deaths are a matter of public record, not a fake conspiracy theory like leftists stupidly and dishonestly claim.

Deaths are a fact
Mysterious is an opinion moron

 

[pjmret]

No, criticizing the paper does not substitute as a refutation of the facts listed in the peer-reviewed report.

Sure it does the errors were identified moron lol

 

[mark francis]

Why isn't it all over fox moron?
Or 8n courts moron?

Who knows and who cares? If you don't know how to refute the facts, then either skip it or find someone who can help you.

 

[pjmret]

Who knows and who cares? If you don't know how to refute the facts, then either skip it or find someone who can help you.

You must enjoy looking stupid
Fox didn't run with it because it wax worthless duh

 

[pjmret]

Who knows and who cares? If you don't know how to refute the facts, then either skip it or find someone who can help you.

The article refuted it duh

Which is why it never got to courts either duh

 

[mark francis]

You must enjoy looking stupid
Fox didn't run with it because it wax worthless duh

That's their business. Nevertheless, neither you nor Fox has refuted the facts listed in the peer-reviewed document.

 

[mark francis]

The article refuted it duh

Which is why it never got to courts either duh

Nobody has refuted the facts listed in the peer-reviewed study, especially including you.

 

[pjmret]

That's their business. Nevertheless, neither you nor Fox has refuted the facts listed in the peer-reviewed document.

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2103619118

Refuted

Which is why fox wisely ignored it

 

[pjmret]

Nobody has refuted the facts listed in the peer-reviewed study, especially including you.

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2103619118

Refuted, moron lol
Which is why you morons lost every court case

 

[the annoying thing]

yes you are. you have nothing that shows clinton did anything wrong but you go on and on about him. lol

Lol you tell us why he lied about his 50 plus flights on the pervert express and 17 visits to the pervert Manson.
Yes I'm sure nothing went on after all he was so honest about it

 

[mark francis]

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2103619118

Refuted, moron lol
Which is why you morons lost every court case

Nobody and especially not you, has refuted the facts in the peer-reviewed report.

 

[pjmret]

Lol you tell us why he lied about his 50 plus flights on the pervert express and 17 visits to the pervert Manson.
Yes I'm sure nothing went on after all he was so honest about it

let me know when you morons have evidence clinton did anything illegal.