Mr. Shaman
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2007
- Messages
- 7,829
Yeah....you "moralists" primary-concern is PRE-delivery.Homeless children and killing by partial birth abortion are two different issues. Got it?
No it is worse than that.
Prolifers in general actually support the killing of innocent people.
For example, most are pro death penalty and an inevitable consequence of the death penalty is the murder of innocent people.
"People who are well represented at trial do not get the death penalty. . . . I have yet to see a death case among the dozens coming to the Supreme Court on eve-of-execution stay applications in which the defendant was well represented at trial." - Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (2001)
No it is worse than that.
Prolifers in general actually support the killing of innocent people.
For example, most are pro death penalty and an inevitable consequence of the death penalty is the murder of innocent people.
This does not make them change their view so they can't be very pro life of actual people.
It must be so confusing being a pro lifer and wondering how you get so excited about the death of a few brainless cells but can be blase about the murder of a real person who is aware, self aware, has friends and family, probably dependents.
To resolve the apparent contradiction you probably have to rely on that stalwart of the religious right...
Hypocrisy
People who are pro life should adopt foster kids or help support the foster program when ever possible in what ever way possible for them. Not all people could adopt and not all have the money to help support the program, but they could baby sit the kids so a foster family could have a day off, or they could make blankets to donate to the familys, there are a number of things someone could do.
This has NOTHING to do with abortion, but rather a loophole in a poorly written law.
They should be required to do so, and churches campaigning against a woman's right to choose should be taxed at high rates to pay for the lack of jobs and insurance for single moms and families in this nation, as well.
They should be required to do so, and churches campaigning against a woman's right to choose should be taxed at high rates to pay for the lack of jobs and insurance for single moms and families in this nation, as well.