Mr. Shaman
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2007
- Messages
- 7,829
It’s not a simple matter to put someone on a no-fly watch list?
So.....what are the requirements???
It’s not a simple matter to put someone on a no-fly watch list?
Yep, those 2 mental midgets seem to THINK that we can dictate to other countries what & how to manage their international flights...
Americans did pull together after 9-11. Where in the hell were you?
Even most all Liberals gave the President the benefit of the doubt and voted his way.
Yep, those 2 mental midgets seem to THINK that we can dictate to other countries what & how to manage their international flights
The airplane in question was bound for the U.S. so you’re damned right we have some say in how Nigeria conducts its international flights. Furthermore, wasn’t the airplane from a U.S. owned airline? What makes you think a U.S. company is exempt from U.S. law just because it does business in another country?
OHHHHH, good Christian you said a naughty word
Maybe you need to take your belligerent attitude to Nigeria and then right along to Amsterdam and explain all of that righteous B.S. to their government directly You know...that wonderful little 'mental dribble' about U.S. LAW. Yipper SKIPPY, you just keep opening that orifice and putting both of your feet squarely into that huge opening
What on earth are you babbling about? What makes you think the U.S. does not have the right to regulate aircraft that are bound for its sovereign territory?
We may be able to regulate the aircraft, especially since it belongs to a company based in the US, but can we really regulate airport security in Nigeria?
What on earth are you babbling about? What makes you think the U.S. does not have the right to regulate aircraft that are bound for its sovereign territory?
Flaja BABBLING:
What makes you think a U.S. company is exempt from U.S. law just because it does business in another country?
And you libs didn’t say the same thing about GWB and 9-11?
Americans did pull together after 9-11. Where in the hell were you?
Even most all Liberals gave the President the benefit of the doubt and voted his way. But when the tally of lies rendered mounted, finally, all the way to at least 935... people had every right, actually responsibility, to change direction.
just imagine running a airport...and having to have it meet every standard of every nation that used it...all at once....
The airplane in question was bound for the U.S. so you’re damned right we have some say in how Nigeria conducts its international flights.
April 2006
"It is hardly surprising, then, that since 9/11 the Bush administration has courted Nigeria as an alternative to volatile petro-states in the Middle East and Latin America. In 2002, the White House declared the oil of Africa (five other countries on the continent are also key producers) a "strategic national interest"—meaning that the United States would use military force, if necessary, to protect it. In short, Nigeria's troubles could become America's and, like those of the Persian Gulf, cost us dearly in blood and money."
OHHHHH, good Christian you said a naughty word
Maybe you need to take your belligerent attitude to Nigeria and then right along to Amsterdam and explain all of that righteous B.S. to their government directly You know...that wonderful little 'mental dribble' about U.S. LAW. Yipper SKIPPY, you just keep opening that orifice and putting both of your feet squarely into that huge opening
What on earth are you babbling about? What makes you think the U.S. does not have the right to regulate aircraft that are bound for its sovereign territory?