Why did Obama…

Werbung:
They knew about him and he was not on the no fly list? Strange

It could have been an oversight but thats not a very good excuse.

I am sure its President Bush's fault some how or another. Everything else is.
 
It could have been an oversight but thats not a very good excuse.

This country cannot afford another oversight. Sadly, if GWB had waged war the way he promised after 9-11, i.e., not worry about collateral damage to non-combatants (as if any Muslim could be called a non-combatant?), we would no longer be at risk for what almost happened yesterday.
 
This country cannot afford another oversight.
judgment_day_terror.jpg


"OH, GAWD!!!!! We've got MAD-FIRECRACKERER'S AFTER US!!!!!!!!"
 
Not keep this Islamic terrorist from getting on a plane? The Feds knew about him since at least last November when his own father went to the U.S. Embassy in Nigeria to warn us. Why wasn’t this Islamic terrorist put on a no-fly watch list?
They knew about him and he was not on the no fly list? Strange.
Whew!!

Talk about birdbrains-of-a-feather.....​

"Congressman Pete Hoekstra (R-MI), who sits on the House Intelligence Committee, is hoping the foiled attack on Northwest Airlines Airbus A330 will help President Barack Obama "connect the dots."

To what, specifically, he's not yet explained."

:rolleyes:
 
Could it be that Obama wanted the terrorist attack to succeed?

You say mind numbingly stupid things like this about the President of the United States of America and you wonder why people don't nicely engage you more but instead take every opportunity to crush you.

How about being an American for just one minute?


 
Not keep this Islamic terrorist from getting on a plane? The Feds knew about him since at least last November when his own father went to the U.S. Embassy in Nigeria to warn us. Why wasn’t this Islamic terrorist put on a no-fly watch list?

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/storie...LIGENCE?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

Could it be that Obama wanted the terrorist attack to succeed?

Why didn't Obama stop this attack? Could it be that he, unlike his predecessor, is not omnipotent and omnipresent? What kind of a messiah is he, anyway? No, no, it can't be that. It must be that he wanted this attack to succeed. Why, he must be a Muslim terrorist after all. Yeah, sure, that's it.
 
You say mind numbingly stupid things like this about the President of the United States of America and you wonder why people don't nicely engage you more but instead take every opportunity to crush you.

How about being an American for just one minute?





being an American means creating a photo op with dead soldiers ?
 
You say mind numbingly stupid things like this about the President of the United States of America and you wonder why people don't nicely engage you more but instead take every opportunity to crush you.

How about being an American for just one minute?



And you libs didn’t say the same thing about GWB and 9-11?
 
And you libs didn’t say the same thing about GWB and 9-11?

Americans did pull together after 9-11. Where in the hell were you?

Even most all Liberals gave the President the benefit of the doubt and voted his way. But when the tally of lies rendered mounted finally all the way to at least 935... people had every right, actually responsibility, to change direction.


 
Originally Posted by flaja
Not keep this Islamic terrorist from getting on a plane? The Feds knew about him since at least last November when his own father went to the U.S. Embassy in Nigeria to warn us. Why wasn’t this Islamic terrorist put on a no-fly watch list?


Originally Posted by Pandora
They knew about him and he was not on the no fly list? Strange.



Mr. Shaman Said: Whew!!

Talk about birdbrains-of-a-feather.....​


Yep, those 2 mental midgets seem to THINK that we can dictate to other countries what & how to manage their international flights...so when the facts confuse them...just blame the current president...OMG

Lets review the facts: gentleman's name is indeed on a 'fly watch list' {along with a mere 100 thousand other people}, seems his father was concerned and called it to some one's attention {yep, good ole dad didn't have a clue where he was going or what he was going to do but he did at least make an attempt to warn someone}, from Nigeria to Amsterdam {yep folks to another foreign country that maintains there security procedure how they want to not how our President tells them how he would prefer it to be done}, from Amsterdam to the USA {now exactly how is that President Obama's fault...:confused: Oh, yes...the I hate our president club members with whom nothing is ever going to make them happy cause he's not a G.W.B. look alike or think alike clone of G.W.B. but they are still in denial that he's gone to greener pastures and will never be back...but they just can't get past that TRUTH!​

So continue the BLAME GAME and in doing so you both look like IDIOTS and nobody can make you look or sound any better :eek:...LMAO​


 
Why didn't Obama stop this attack? Could it be that he, unlike his predecessor, is not omnipotent and omnipresent? What kind of a messiah is he, anyway? No, no, it can't be that. It must be that he wanted this attack to succeed. Why, he must be a Muslim terrorist after all. Yeah, sure, that's it.
Especially when you consider....no one's (especially the Freepers & Dead-O-Heads) yet answered for why Lil' Dumbya has never managed to explain his inaction...on a significantly-larger attack!!!

National_Park_Service_9-11_Statue_of_Liberty_and_WTC_fire.jpg
August 4, 2002

"As the new Administration took office, Rice kept Clarke in his job as counterterrorism czar. In early February, he repeated to Vice President Dick Cheney the briefing he had given to Rice and Hadley. There are differing opinions on how seriously the Bush team took Clarke's warnings. Some members of the outgoing Administration got the sense that the Bush team thought the Clintonites had become obsessed with terrorism. "It was clear," says one, "that this was not the same priority to them that it was to us."

Some counterterrorism officials think there is another reason for the Bush Administration's dilatory response. Clarke's paper, says an official, "was a Clinton proposal." Keeping Clarke around was one thing; buying into the analysis of an Administration that the Bush team considered feckless and naive was quite another. So Rice instructed Clarke to initiate a new "policy review process" on the terrorism threat. Clarke dived into yet another round of meetings. And his proposals were nibbled nearly to death."
 
Werbung:
being an American means creating a photo op with dead soldiers ?
No....it means not ignoring them....per BUSHCO.​

April 23, 2004

"The Pentagon has cited a policy, used during the first Persian Gulf war, as its reason for preventing news organizations from showing images of coffins arriving in the United States. That policy was not consistently followed, however, and President Bill Clinton took part in numerous ceremonies honoring dead servicemen. In March 2003, the Pentagon issued a directive it said was established in November 2000, saying, "There will not be arrival ceremonies of, or media coverage of, deceased military personnel returning to or departing from" air bases.

While critics have charged that the administration is seeking to keep unwelcome images of the war's human cost away from the American public, the Pentagon has said that only individual services at a gravesite give proper context to the sacrifices of soldiers and their relatives.

"The president believes that we should always honor and show respect for those who have made the ultimate sacrifice defending our freedoms," Scott McClellan, the White House press secretary, said last night.

A New York Times/CBS News poll taken in December found that 62 percent of Americans said the public should be allowed to see pictures of the military honor guard receiving the coffins of soldiers killed in Iraq as they are returned to the United States. 27 percent said the public should not be.

Among the national television news organizations, only the Fox News Channel had no plans to use any of the photos or explore the issue of why they had been barred from use in the news media, a channel spokesman said."
 
Back
Top