Who Shouldnt Have Guns?

[PLC1]


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reliability of Observations
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Standard Deviations Reliability
Corr Obs Residuals Redundancy Internal External
(mm) (mm)
Vector: SRS-3014-SRS-74 weight= 1.00
N 6.20 7.46 0.52 0.03 4.11
E 10.75 12.31 0.57 0.03 3.71
H 2.95 3.66 0.57 0.03 3.74

Vector: SRS-3014-SRS-3013 weight= 1.00
N 5.88 9.44 0.66 0.03 3.27
E 10.30 17.57 0.71 0.03 3.10
H 2.70 5.27 0.72 0.03 2.61

Vector: SRS-3014-SRS-56 weight= 1.00
N 5.63 8.54 0.60 0.02 3.71
E 9.53 14.75 0.69 0.03 3.39
H 2.62 4.93 0.70 0.03 2.72

Vector: SRS-3014-SRS-74 Occ.[02] weight= 1.00
N 6.20 39.74 0.99 0.15 0.43
E 10.75 93.61 0.98 0.12 0.56
H 2.95 10.19 0.97 0.08 0.70

Vector: SRS-3014-SRS-3013 Occ.[02] weight= 1.00
N 5.88 11.48 0.82 0.04 1.83
E 10.30 20.44 0.79 0.04 2.05
H 2.70 4.52 0.79 0.03 2.17

Vector: SRS-3014-SRS-56 Occ.[02] weight= 1.00
N 5.63 10.16 0.81 0.03 1.90
E 9.53 17.69 0.75 0.03 2.30
H 2.62 3.23 0.76 0.03 2.33

Vector: SRS-74-SRS-3013 weight= 1.00
N 6.16 14.79 0.81 0.04 2.12
E 11.14 25.41 0.81 0.04 2.16
H 2.73 6.25 0.84 0.04 1.82

Vector: SRS-74-SRS-56 weight= 1.00
N 5.91 13.02 0.73 0.03 2.65
E 10.36 19.81 0.78 0.03 2.48
H 2.67 6.16 0.83 0.03 1.86

Vector: SRS-74-SRS-3013 Occ.[02] weight= 1.00
N 6.16 9.60 0.79 0.04 2.06
E 11.14 20.16 0.77 0.04 2.19
H 2.73 4.05 0.71 0.03 2.64

Vector: SRS-74-SRS-56 Occ.[02] weight= 1.00
N 5.91 8.43 0.76 0.03 2.21
E 10.36 16.78 0.71 0.03 2.48
H 2.67 3.22 0.67 0.03 2.90

Vector: SRS-3013-SRS-56 weight= 1.00
N 5.53 11.13 0.76 0.03 2.59
E 9.88 19.10 0.74 0.03 2.61
H 2.33 3.92 0.79 0.03 2.23

Vector: SRS-3013-SRS-56 Occ.[02] weight= 1.00
N 5.53 7.67 0.74 0.03 2.39
E 9.88 15.46 0.71 0.03 2.54
H 2.33 2.87 0.65 0.03 3.03


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Relative Precision
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ellip. Dist.
Height Diff. Relative
Azimuth Std Dev Precision 95% Ellipse
(m) (mm)

Vector: SRS-3014-SRS-74 weight= 1.00
2299.200 5.9 Hor. 1/390793 major 15.4 mm
-0.616 9.7 Ver. 1/236482 azm. 5 deg
307 19 51.9 0.5sec minor 13.1 mm

Vector: SRS-3014-SRS-3013 weight= 1.00
9752.745 5.7 Hor. 1/1717826 major 14.8 mm
11.490 9.2 Ver. 1/1059831 azm. 167 deg
323 32 12.8 0.1sec minor 12.7 mm

Vector: SRS-3014-SRS-56 weight= 1.00
10963.083 5.3 Hor. 1/2069347 major 14.2 mm
7.787 8.5 Ver. 1/1283908 azm. 171 deg
325 03 51.7 0.1sec minor 11.7 mm

Vector: SRS-74-SRS-3013 weight= 1.00
7572.141 6.0 Hor. 1/1263605 major 15.5 mm
12.106 9.8 Ver. 1/773467 azm. 174 deg
328 23 44.4 0.2sec minor 14.1 mm

Vector: SRS-3013-SRS-56 weight= 1.00
1241.331 5.4 Hor. 1/227793 major 14.1 mm
-3.703 8.5 Ver. 1/145565 azm. 166 deg
337 08 43.2 1.0sec minor 12.9 mm

Desired Network Accuracy was met for all Vectors

That is the summary of the complex mathematics involved in what is otherwise the mundane chore of measuring distances on the surface of the earth. This process is the SAME whether you are measuring 100 kilometers or 100 centimeters. Add to this the parameters of projectile motion and you have an immensely complex mathematical process indeed!

Now, are you going to sit there and claim that appreciation of this is what prompts your interest in guns? Or do you merely indulge in the freudian glee associated with seeing things (living or inanimate) blown to pieces?

You really aren't fooling anyone.

Either you have taken a class in statistics, or have copied a page from someone else who did.

Have you ever fired a rifle?

If so, did you fire it at a paper target?

Did the target move when you shot it, as you said it would above?

Do you think you could hit the broad side of a barn at 20 paces with a rifle?

 

[numinus]

Either you have taken a class in statistics, or have copied a page from someone else who did.

Have you ever fired a rifle?

If so, did you fire it at a paper target?

Did the target move when you shot it, as you said it would above?

Do you think you could hit the broad side of a barn at 20 paces with a rifle?

That is a copy of the work I'm doing presently. It is the report generated by sokkia spectrum survey processing software. Multiply that a couple of hundred times and you would have an idea why I do not have time to educate you in the application of statistics in engineering -- which you claim is the reason why you are enamored with guns in the first place.

You should pick the people you intend to sell crap to -- preferably the low-brows who seem to over-populate this forum lately.

 

[numinus]

So, you've proved you can copy/paste pages upon pages of technical information. Congratulations.

I am a member of the gun culture, along with tens of millions of others. If I have to explain it, you do not (and quite likely CANNOT) understand.

Of course I copied it -- from the Project folder in MY COMPUTER. That is the work I am currently doing, *****.

 

[numinus]

Just as I have stated, shooting can be an intellectual pursuit. Most however, choose not to become so involved.

"... Or do you merely indulge in the Freudian glee associated with seeing things (living or inanimate) blown to pieces?"
I never got out of the anal sadistic stage, so yes, I am sure this is why I do it. It is what I do; it is what I enjoy (inanimate). I wonder what Freud would have said about you.

He would have written tons about me. Instead, he chose to write about abnormal psychology -- which is within YOUR backyard, I'm afraid.

 

[numinus]

I think he might have written a thesis on Numi.

I'm sorry I can't say the same about you. Apparently, you can't write ANYTHING useful.

 

[numinus]

Yup! you got me...this is exactly what I calculate when I sit down (at the bench) to sight in my guns!

Exactly!

That is why the standard deviation of surveying equipment (which is essentially a telescope) is included in its literature and not in guns.

Engineering equipment is supposed to be used by educated people while any ***** can fire a gun.

Duh?

 

[PLC1]

That is a copy of the work I'm doing presently. It is the report generated by sokkia spectrum survey processing software. Multiply that a couple of hundred times and you would have an idea why I do not have time to educate you in the application of statistics in engineering -- which you claim is the reason why you are enamored with guns in the first place.

You should pick the people you intend to sell crap to -- preferably the low-brows who seem to over-populate this forum lately.

Since you have posted tons of totally irrelevant material, I can only assume that the answerto each of my questions is no.

Oh, yes, and once again, you have descended to the level of personal insult. Check and mate. Sorry Numi, maybe next time you can get a scintillating discussion going about statistics, a subject of which you claim to have some knowledge.

 

[dahermit]

Exactly!

Duh?

"Duh?" and "...report I am doing..." As I suspected, a kid.
This is a good example of why I have posted on another forum that it is unfortunate that there is no way of keeping children off adult forums. We adults do not go on "myspace", we adults should not have to put up with there childishness here. We do not need the "Duhs", etc. inherent with the rude youth culture.
Come back in 30 years Sonny, but research proper manners first.

 

[numinus]

Since you have posted tons of totally irrelevant material, I can only assume that the answerto each of my questions is no.

Oh, yes, and once again, you have descended to the level of personal insult. Check and mate. Sorry Numi, maybe next time you can get a scintillating discussion going about statistics, a subject of which you claim to have some knowledge.

I was answering IN DETAIL how standard deviation works in zeroing rifles. It is not my problem you don't understand.

I have fired an m16. I have fired a 45 and a 9mm. Unlike your absurd claims, NO AMOUNT OF FIRING A GUN WOULD GIVE YOU COMPETENCE ON THE SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS OF IT.

Capice?

 

[numinus]

"Duh?" and "...report I am doing..." As I suspected, a kid.
This is a good example of why I have posted on another forum that it is unfortunate that there is no way of keeping children off adult forums. We adults do not go on "myspace", we adults should not have to put up with there childishness here. We do not need the "Duhs", etc. inherent with the rude youth culture.
Come back in 30 years Sonny, but research proper manners first.

LMAO.

Its called a net adjustment report and whatever it is called DOES NOT CHANGE THE FACT THAT I AM A CONSULTING ENGINEER FOR MORE THAN 15 YEARS.

Your bravado does not hide the fact that you are completely ignorant to what I am saying. Come back in 5 years when you've gotten an education.

 

[PLC1]

I was answering IN DETAIL how standard deviation works in zeroing rifles. It is not my problem you don't understand.

I have fired an m16. I have fired a 45 and a 9mm. Unlike your absurd claims, NO AMOUNT OF FIRING A GUN WOULD GIVE YOU COMPETENCE ON THE SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS OF IT.

Capice?

Personal insults, now in bold and caps. You have run out of arguments and have no idea at all what you're babbling about.

Check and mate.

 

[numinus]

Personal insults, now in bold and caps. You have run out of arguments and have no idea at all what you're babbling about.

Check and mate.

Do you know of anyone who gained competence in science and mathematics by firing guns?

And do you not think that the simple fact I mentioned effectively exposes the crap some people are peddling to the effect that gun ownership is somehow an educational or intellectual pursuit?

I do not need to insult you since you are doing exactly that on your own.

 

[PLC1]

Do you know of anyone who gained competence in science and mathematics by firing guns?

And do you not think that the simple fact I mentioned effectively exposes the crap some people are peddling to the effect that gun ownership is somehow an educational or intellectual pursuit?

I do not need to insult you since you are doing exactly that on your own.

I don't know of anyone who gained competence in science and math by firing guns, nor do I know of anyonw who gained competence in firing guns by studying math and science. Your posts using statistics to try to explain sighting in a rifle are irrelevant and immaterial to the discussion at hand.

While gun ownership is not an "educational and intellectual pursuit", it does take some understanding and skill to use a gun safely and to hit the target.

So, by all means, go back to your intellectual pursuits, and leave gun ownership to individuals who are stable, and who have the skills to use them safely.

 

[dahermit]

LMAO.

Its called a net adjustment report and whatever it is called DOES NOT CHANGE THE FACT THAT I AM A CONSULTING ENGINEER FOR MORE THAN 15 YEARS.

Your bravado does not hide the fact that you are completely ignorant to what I am saying. Come back in 5 years when you've gotten an education.

Associate of Applied Science, Metal Processing.(2 years)
Bachelors of Science, Trade Technical Education.(2 years)
Master's Degree, Occupational Education, Training in Business and Industry.(2 years)
Central Office Certification (Two years)
Administrative Certification in Secondary Education (2 years)
Certification in Computer Education (another 2 years).
Novel Network Engineer Certification (another 2 years).

Too late, I have 14 years of post secondary education.

Notice that because I am 64 years old(not a rude child), I do not suffix everything with a "Duh".

And, as you are fond of saying (despite the education you claim), you are not fooling anyone.

 

[Jarlaxle]

Do you know of anyone who gained competence in science and mathematics by firing guns?

Two people off the top of my head.