Who is more reliably going to protect our rights than Trump?

let me know when that actually happens. lol

ps - the red lines under words means they aren't spelled right. you might want to check your posts, unless you are not just a *****, but a lazy one :)
I guess we need to be formally introduced.

I'm not a lazy *****.

I'm Yo Daddy!

šŸ˜Ž
 
Werbung:
trump is greedy.
trump is stupid.
so that doesn't disqualify her for beating trump.

so what of her "policies' would have been a nightmare? be specific, not stupid. Not that I think you can.
Trump was the best POTUS since Reagan.
 
explain why she would have been, using specifics then.

show that you aren't a *****.

i just asked a question about proving a claim, lets see if you are any smarter than he is. I'm starting to think not :)
hillary is a drunken liberal who is greedy and has very bad morals and ethic
 
hillary is a drunken liberal who is greedy and has very bad morals and ethic
Yet you chose a racist, self admitted women molester, 3 wives and 6 mistresses, impeached twice, failed to acknowledge his defeat, stole docos and staged a coup yet it's Hilary has poor morals and ethics.
 
I guess we need to be formally introduced.

I'm not a lazy *****.

I'm Yo Daddy!

šŸ˜Ž

based on your posts, you are formally a lazy *****.

you made a claim about obama and illegal files, for example, and cowardly and lazily ran away when asked to prove it :)
 
proof?

i suspect you will be a lazy lying ***** and run away again :)
Take. The. Time. To. Watch. These. Videos. And. TAKE. NOTES.

Best Argument for Trump reelection Charlie Kirk (6:11)




3 Years of Accomplishments





 
Take. The. Time. To. Watch. These. Videos. And. TAKE. NOTES.

Best Argument for Trump reelection Charlie Kirk (6:11)




3 Years of Accomplishments




you think charlie kirk proves something , posting in a thread about protecting rights? lol

the ***** who said satanists didn't deserve protection of their right to worship?
hahahah
hahaha

that's about the dumbest thing you've posted, and you've posted some stupid things :)


when you have an objective proof of your claim, let me know.
clue for morons: charlie kirk isn't objective :)
 
you think charlie kirk proves something , posting in a thread about protecting rights? lol

the ***** who said satanists didn't deserve protection of their right to worship?
hahahah
hahaha

that's about the dumbest thing you've posted, and you've posted some stupid things :)


when you have an objective proof of your claim, let me know.
clue for morons: charlie kirk isn't objective :)
 
Werbung:
Back
Top