If you're willing to participate, I might be able to formulate such a questionnaire... lets see what we can come up with.
The first category deals with your concept of mans relation to society.
1. Are you an Individualist or a Collectivist?
Individualism:The individual is sovereign, rights of the individual should be protected and individuals should be left free to act in any way that does not infringe on the rights of others.
Collectivism: The interests of Individuals should be subordinated to the interests of society, every individual has a duty, or moral obligation, to work for the greater good and the rights of society as a whole take precedent over the rights of individuals.
All ideologies fall within one of those two categories, none can share both.
-----
The next category is Metaphysics and deals with your concept of reality.
2. Which statement most closely parallels your concept of reality?
a. Reality exists independent of my ability to understand, comprehend, or know of its existence. Example, a speck of dust in space exists whether or not I know of its existence and regardless of my ability to understand or comprehend its nature.
b. Nothing exists outside the minds ability to conceptualize its existence. Example, a speck of dust in space only exists once I know its there and I have the capacity to comprehend and understand its nature.
c. Nothing exists. Example, a speck of dust in space is merely an illusion.
d. None of the above (please give an explanation)
-----
This next category is epistemology, your concept of knowledge.
3. Which of the following statements most closely parallels your concept of knowledge formulation?
a. Knowledge can be gained by mystical means. Example, you can learn by osmosis (fall asleep on a book and wake up knowing its contents).
b. Knowledge is subjective, there are no absolutes, and nothing can be known for certain. Example, what you perceive as a blue triangle may actually be a green square to someone else.
c. There are absolutes. Knowledge is gained by applying logic, i.e., through inductive and/or deductive reasoning, by using a premise, or premises, to formulate a conclusion. Example, all men are mortal, I am a man, therefore I am mortal.
d. None of the above (please give an explanation).
-----
This last category deals with ethics, your concept of morality.
4. Which statements most closely parallels your concept of morality?
a. The concepts of good and evil, right and wrong, justice and virtue are subjective to the individual. Example, what you consider good may actually be evil to another.
b. The concepts of good and evil, right and wrong, justice and virtue are illusions created to control individuals. Example, nothing can be either good or evil.
c. The concepts of good and evil, right and wrong, justice and virtue are absolutes and applicable only to living entities. Example, that which allows an entity to perpetuate its existence through self sustaining and self generated actions is good, that which threatens or extinguishes its life is evil.
d. None of the above (please give an explanation).
-----
As you can see, with just those few necessary questions, putting together a questionnaire that would cover every possible ideology would fill a book. Those are an excellent starting point that will include, or rule out, many possibilities and allow someone to find their ideology by answering a minimum number of questions.
Again, anyone with a genuine interest is welcome to participate, just start by providing answers to those questions and we will go on from there.
Not that I agree with all you write but for the sake of the thread, heer goes...
1. Individualist
2. A
3. D there are absolutes whether we understand them or not and logic need not apply.
4. D The concepts of good and evil, right and wrong, justice and virtue are absolutes. Without annt he other stuff.