Pandora
Well-Known Member
the photo was taken less than 5 min. from the shooting so yeah, hard to fake.
-
Discuss politics - join our community by registering for free here! HOP - the political discussion forum
What If Trayvon Martin Had Killed George Zimmerman?
- Thread starter steveox
- Start date
Werbung:
steveox
Well-Known Member
Dora,,That photo is real,,It was about Vietnam war protests in the 60s. You know Make love not war,,Give Peace a chance. You know the loons at woodstock. The National Guard can restore order than Police can. Not even the LAPD could quiet down those blacks who went berzerk after MLK assassination and Rodney King verdict.
Pandora
Well-Known Member
Dershowitz on the Zimmerman case
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/04/20/Dershowitz-prosecution-immoral
this is another Duke University prosecution case and Corey should go to jail. Dershowitz is correct. What is more important about this case is obama's roll as fire starter. He lit up the racial polarization card then walked casually away. But as the pieces fall in this case it Appears that Zimmerman is in fact not guilty and the charges are paper thin and the case is now a mess.
Further, the press never anticipated that Zimmerman might be human. He appeared at his bond hearing and he was well spoken, contrite and decent. So here we go again with Obama leading by polarizing, leading by creating uncertainty and keeping the nation off balance. The hatred for Obama is palpable especially after one of his fire starter sessions.
Things are getting more angry now following this completely unnecessary stirring of a small and meaningless case in Sanford Florida. And reality is starting to set in about how half cocked obama is and how reckless he is with his racial fire starting.
If you read the Zuckerman article he gives a very clear appraisal of the obama policy failings. And it is now coming to roost. This is the same frustration felt back in the Carter days when it became clear that Carter was clueless. And we already know that obama can't run on his record which is abysmal. So he will have to pull his ambush tactics on Romney. But it won't work and it won't work because his fire starting in Sanford has created massive anger for his involvement. obama thinks he can get away with fire starting but Americans have had it with his polarization.
Look at Keystone. Democrats are now getting behind it too. They know obama is a lost cause. They know he has steered the democrats to a far left pelosi region and the liberals are now scared of this coming election. They don't want to be anywhere near obama on energy.
The country is in bad shape because obama is a socialist and he wants to destroy this country I guess for his muslim father. Americans are lucky the damage has been somewhat contained but I believe they have been quit and waiting for the election. I see a big ground swell moving in the republican direction. We have had enough of the fire starter and the country is fatigued just as it was at the end of carter.
Pandora
Well-Known Member
Was he calling me Dora?
Gipper
Well-Known Member
I think so.
Pandora
Well-Known Member
I thought so when I first read his post and I was so pissed off and offended by it because I thought he was making fun of me being part spanish. Then later decided that he wouldn't know that I were part spanish so he wouldnt be trying to infer that I were Dora the explorer... But it just hit me that its probably short for Pandora hehe
see how easy it is to get offended even when its probably not meant that way
pocketfullofshells
Well-Known Member
If you watched the hearing this morning, which I am sure you didn't because that would imply that you were informed, you would have seen that the prosecution had no evidence to produce that Zimmerman was chasing Martin nor that Zimmerman was profiling. But it's OK ... we all know how liberals feel about facts.
actually I was working...but the 911 tape...he is asked if he is chasing ...he says yes...its really not hard to prove.Had he not chased him....he would have been in his car going home still ...and nothing would have happened...and no one would be dead.
pocketfullofshells
Well-Known Member
lets think about it...he was chasing someone...he had a gun...is it not possible for someone to defend themselves against someone chasing them with a gun...that could result in wounds? Or again...is it only ok to defend yourself if you have a gun.
pocketfullofshells
Well-Known Member
I have my head 10 times more bloody from a nick...head wounds bleed alot even with things the size of a papercut. I actuly was woozy from blood loss at work from it once...and when cleaned up could hardly even see where it was cut.
steveox
Well-Known Member
What if it was a Cop instead of Zimmerman? It would be a differant outcome cause the State would not prositcute the officers. Just like nothing was done about the undercover officer who shot an unarmed guy 50 times comming from his wedding reception. The Governors office wouldnt prositcute him.
Texas_tea
Well-Known Member
Wow ... the ignorance of liberals never ceases to amaze me.
I have heard the 911 tapes and yes you can hear Zimmerman breathing heavy towards the end of the tape but there is no indication he was chasing Martin. The dispatcher did not ask if he was "chasing" the suspect. Earlier in the tape prior to Zimmerman exiting his vehicle the dispatcher ask if Zimmerman was following the suspect. It was never asked of Zimmerman in the tape if he was chasing Martin. The defense claims that Zimmerman lost Martin from his sight at that time and that Martin was hiding and ambushed Zimmerman as he returned to his vehicle.
But most revealing is when Zimmerman's attorney specifically asked the detectives in yesterdays hearing if he had any evidence that Zimmerman confronted Martin and he said NO! In other words they have no evidence that suggest Zimmerman is not telling the truth about Martin attacking him as he walked back to his SUV!
No one would be dead had Martin not attacked Zimmerman just as he did the bus driver a few months earlier. The detectives have already admitted under oath they do not have evidence to suggest otherwise.
Pandora
Well-Known Member
The witness said Zimmerman was at his vehicle on the phone and that is when Martin came up to him and threw him to the ground. Zimmerman had been following him and admitted that to the police but stopped following him to make the call.
Let’s say the witness is blind and that is not what happened. If I see someone walking down my street that looks suspicious and is the general description of people who have been robbing my block in the last few months and I follow them that is not a good reason for them to smash my head in the ground and if I had a gun Ida put a frakin cap in his head for doing it. I wouldn’t blame Zimmerman for shooting Martin when it’s clear that Martin attacked him first.
Werbung:
Pandora
Well-Known Member
The operator asked if he were following him and he said yes he had been. The operator told him to stop following him and he said ok. When he got off the phone the witness said that Martin confronted and attacked Zimmerman and his head got smashed. Why do you insist that following someone is the same as chasing them and if he were really "chasing" the tiny boy why did he stop "chasing" him to make a phone call? Why not just gun him down? You think that’s what he wanted to do right? So why bother with calling the police when he could have kept on "chasing" him and shooting him?
Similar threads
