Voting fraud case dismissed because of fears of what finding fraud would do to confidence in elections

[pjmret]

You don't know what you are talking about. The reason the law requires signature verifications is so signatures can be used to verify the legitimacy of the vote. Democrats claim it would be wrong to use signatures to verify votes in voting fraud investigations, but that is a lie.

i know exactly what I am talking about.
you clearly dont.

let me know when you will release YOUR personal information, hypocrite, since you want it released for OTHERS.

 

[Boris Norris]

The reason many voting fraud cases were thrown out is that judges feared what finding massive fraud would do to American unity. America is deeply divided between the left and the right and if it is discovered or proven the left stole the 2020 election by fraud that could easily result in a massive collapse of the current fragile public peace between Americans on the two sides of the divide. To many judges, maintaining the peace between fighting factions in America required a shutdown of investigations and talk of 2020 voting fraud, thus prompting the rash of voting fraud cases thrown out on technical grounds or for false or unproven reasons.

Kari Lake fought valiantly to expose voting fraud in Arizona, but the establishment would not allow that exposure.

Judge Rules on Kari Lake’s Review Of 2022 Ballot Envelope Signatures (msn.com) 12-2-23

Judge Rules on Kari Lake’s Review Of 2022 Ballot Envelope Signatures
Judge Rules on Kari Lake’s Review Of 2022 Ballot Envelope Signatures© Provided by State Of The Union
An Arizona judge denied Kari Lake’s request to review ballot envelope signatures for the 2022 general election, citing concerns about public confidence in the electoral process.
The judge sided with Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer, who argued that releasing the signatures would compromise voter privacy and election security.

For fear of undermining confidence in elections the judge cited ambiguous reasons for dismissing the voting fraud case to prevent unearthing facts of fraud.

Rubbish.
You had nothing from the beginning.

 

[mark francis]

Rubbish.
You had nothing from the beginning.

Mismatched signatures are a real problem for Democrats, proving there were massive problems with the 2020 election the Democrats want to hide.

 

[Boris Norris]

Mismatched signatures are a real problem for Democrats, proving there were massive problems with the 2020 election the Democrats want to hide.

Of course it was. And we his it well and will do it again. Fyck republican godbotherers.

 

[mark francis]

Of course it was. And we his it well and will do it again. Fyck republican godbotherers.

If signature verifications were meant to find and reject ineligible votes, then why have Democrats fought like hell against using the signature verification process to reject ineligible votes? The evidence of 2020 fraud remains and Democrats show their corruption by their refusal to use verification processes to weed out illegitimate votes.

 

[pjmret]

If signature verifications were meant to find and reject ineligible votes, then why have Democrats fought like hell against using the signature verification process to reject ineligible votes? The evidence of 2020 fraud remains and Democrats show their corruption by their refusal to use verification processes to weed out illegitimate votes.

the signature verification process was used. who fought "like hell" not to use it?

 

[Boris Norris]

If signature verifications were meant to find and reject ineligible votes, then why have Democrats fought like hell against using the signature verification process to reject ineligible votes? The evidence of 2020 fraud remains and Democrats show their corruption by their refusal to use verification processes to weed out illegitimate votes.

Yes. It's so obvious now.
I shall repent as soon as I run out of altar wine.

 

[mark francis]

the signature verification process was used. who fought "like hell" not to use it?

The judge in Arizona refused to order the signatures to be examined for fraud because he said he was concerned that questioning the legitimacy of votes would cause Americans not to have faith in elections.

Judge Rules on Kari Lake’s Review Of 2022 Ballot Envelope Signatures (msn.com) 12-2-23

Judge Rules on Kari Lake’s Review Of 2022 Ballot Envelope Signatures

An Arizona judge denied Kari Lake’s request to review ballot envelope signatures for the 2022 general election, citing concerns about public confidence in the electoral process.

 

[pjmret]

The judge in Arizona refused to order the signatures to be examined for fraud because he said he was concerned that questioning the legitimacy of votes would cause Americans not to have faith in elections.

Judge Rules on Kari Lake’s Review Of 2022 Ballot Envelope Signatures (msn.com) 12-2-23

Judge Rules on Kari Lake’s Review Of 2022 Ballot Envelope Signatures

An Arizona judge denied Kari Lake’s request to review ballot envelope signatures for the 2022 general election, citing concerns about public confidence in the electoral process.

Yes because releasing signatures can lead to fraud which would impact confidence It is such a simple concept only a ***** wouldn't get it duh

 

[mark francis]

Yes because releasing signatures can lead to fraud which would impact confidence It is such a simple concept only a ***** wouldn't get it duh

Of course. Voter IDs are bad, according to Democrats, because they might make it hard for ignorant blacks to register to vote. And purging tens of thousands of names of ineligible voters from voter rolls in accordance with voting laws is wrong because the names of a handful of eligible poor blacks might get removed. Democrats do not want voting integrity and security. They want protections for fraud because that is their biggest source for achieving political power.

 

[pjmret]

Of course. Voter IDs are bad, according to Democrats, because they might make it hard for ignorant blacks to register to vote. And purging tens of thousands of names of ineligible voters from voter rolls in accordance with voting laws is wrong because the names of a handful of eligible poor blacks might get removed. Democrats do not want voting integrity and security. They want protections for fraud because that is their biggest source for achieving political power.

more right wing blather having nothing to do with my post.
because you know my post is correct. lol

 

[mark francis]

more right wing blather having nothing to do with my post.
because you know my post is correct. lol

You may actually be right on some points but the points you are wrong on are whoppers.

 

[pjmret]

You may actually be right on some points but the points you are wrong on are whoppers.

which ones am I wrong on that are 'whoppers".
prove i am wrong using credible independent proof.
but you wont