vyo476
Well-Known Member
In most cases they're forcing themselves, because they don't believe an independent candidate has a chance at winning. It's organization vs. a lack of organization - the Democrats and the Republicans are well-organized (kind of...) and can get their messages out there. The problem with independent candidates is that there are too many of them - you may vote for Joe Schmo but the next guy over votes for Jane Doe because Jane Doe's economic policy is a bit less lenient than Mr. Schmo's. Eventually you have as many candidates as you have citizens and that's no good either. Fear of allowing this to happen and the convenience of the two-party system keeps the two-party system in place.If that were true, they would not insist on voting for the same two parties. Obviously they are not tired enough to actually vote for someone else.
I wouldnt dream of it. But the fact remains that they do have choices. For whatever reason, they are choosing to vote for the two main parties anyway. No one is forcing them to vote Republican or Democrat.
How did you determine that the vast majority of Americans do not really agree with Democrat or Republican ideology?
That's not what I meant at all. I meant that most people do agree with the Republicans or the Democrats about everything other than the very existence of the two parties. Issues like abortion or the War in Iraq, yeah, the people will generally conform to one of the two major opinions. No one is a fan of partisanship, though, and partisanship is what keeps the two parties alive. There's a fundamental difference of opinion there between the people on one hand and the parties on the other that must be addressed in order for all other issues to be anything other than hypocrisy.
We are not even in the same universe as Cuba. Americans have a choice. Lots of choices actually. Cubans have none.
I didn't say we were Cuba. Simply that we were growing more like them.
You could try asking. My opinions on this are based on simple conversation with others.You have no way of knowing what the people want beyond how they choose to vote.
There is a difference between a person and the people. A person has personal, individual opinions. The people are a group of individuals who are trying to think of what is best for the country.Even commercial polls like CNN and Fox and Pew are only a pale shadow; they go off a small sample. But an actual election polls the entire voting population.
Democracy is based on compromise...it is unlikely you will ever get someone into office that you agree with on every issue. You dont always get your way. But even so, no one is forcing you to compromise...you can still vote for whoever you want. The fact that the majority doesnt agree with you does not mean that you do not have freedom to choose. It just means you were overruled.
I agree with everything you have to say in this paragraph wholeheartedly. I just don't believe that the majority of Americans are big fans of partisan politics. I don't expect to vote for a candidate that I totally agree with (unless I'm running for office...) but I would rather my candidate not be wrapped up in partisanship, which is only destructive.
Tell me, do you like partisanship?