Pandora
Well-Known Member
The decision of taking someone off of life support has something to do with killing another person, if you believe that said person is still alive.
I think its just like suicide. If the person said before they got in that state, should I ever get in this state please let me die. I am perfectly ok with suicide.
I had a radical hysterectomy and I am here to tell you there was nothing heart wrenching about it. I have also had an abortion. Its been years ago and I still am bothered by it. I know that I will never get over having done what I did.I submit that a decision that only affects the person making that decision is still heart wrenching, to that person and to his/her family. Having a radical total hysterectomy, for example, has a profound effect on the woman involved, and on her husband.
Only a socialist or communist or statist or humanist would think a person spending what ever they do on their own child would tantamount to killing 99. its funny too because hollywierd is full of socialist, communists humanists who spend all their money on themselves but think that statement is accurate.Also, is spending millions on one child, instead of spending those same millions to save a hundred children, not tantamount to killing 99? Sure, if the millions belong to the parents of the one child, then it is their decision. Usually, that is not the case, but, sure, they should be allowed to spend their own money however they see fit.
Just as a pregnant woman can use her body however she sees fit, either to carry the fetus to term, or not.
But, neither decision should be taken lightly.
Yes a pregnant woman can choose to kill her child, its legal I agree with you there, but the dumb woman better not forget her seat belt right, because its only her body to do with what she wants when it comes to killing her offspring. The rest of the time the state and the law makes the rules.