Trump is Still Winning

[mark francis]

That of course doesn't prove your claim about hundreds of thousands of ballots for Biden you you'd realize that I'm gonna catch your lies every time and point out how stupid you are correct LOL

Democrats continue to deny the 2020 voting fraud the unrefuted evidence against them shows.

 

[pjmret]

Democrats continue to deny the 2020 voting fraud the unrefuted evidence against them shows.

you continue to stupidly believe democrats have any obligation to pander to your claims. lol.

"evidence" doesn't "show" anything until you idiots prove its credible....duh.

you are a legal mor on.

 

[Boris Norris]

Democrats continue to deny the 2020 voting fraud the unrefuted evidence against them shows.

Democrats have never denied voter fraud or hailed it. You've been harping about it since the beginning and no one shred of evidence.
They do not have to prove anything the same as you didn't after Trump won.

You really are becoming very unhinged and irrational as the election draws closer. You're making outrageous claims only to be busted soon after. Why don't you think about lies you post and believe? What is the point of that bullshit? It's doesn't give you credibility and you look very foolish.

 

[mark francis]

you continue to stupidly believe democrats have any obligation to pander to your claims. lol.

"evidence" doesn't "show" anything until you idiots prove its credible....duh.

you are a legal mor on.

Naturally, the evidence you remain ignorant of does not show you anything.

 

[pjmret]

Naturally, the evidence you remain ignorant of does not show you anything.

naturally i laugh at your whining until such time as you prove your claims are credible.
take your credible evidence to court..oh wait, you have, and they laughed at you too. lol

 

[Boris Norris]

Naturally, the evidence you remain ignorant of does not show you anything

WHAT BLOODY EVIDENCE?

You've had years to produce it and still won't. You've got nothing you demented bitter old fool. You should be in a home.

 

[mark francis]

WHAT BLOODY EVIDENCE?

You've had years to produce it and still won't. You've got nothing you demented bitter old fool. You should be in a home.

You have rejected the evidence I have posted but you do not prove the evidence does not exist and you do not disprove the evidence that does exist.

 

[Boris Norris]

You have rejected the evidence I have posted but you do not prove the evidence does not exist and you do not disprove the evidence that does exist.

I don't need to see the evidence that you haven't shown nor prove the evidence exists.
You got nothing but lies and hate and bitterness.

 

[pjmret]

You have rejected the evidence I have posted but you do not prove the evidence does not exist and you do not disprove the evidence that does exist.

good thing burden of proof here in the us is on those claiming fraud. lol.
you idiots have failed every time.

 

[mark francis]

good thing burden of proof here in the us is on those claiming fraud. lol.
you idiots have failed every time.

Democrats will never convince reasonable Americans that they committed no voting fraud in 2020 in spite of the massive evidence of fraud they refused to investigate and refuse to discuss.

 

[pjmret]

Democrats will never convince reasonable Americans that they committed no voting fraud in 2020 in spite of the massive evidence of fraud they refused to investigate and refuse to discuss.

Nope reasonable Americans understand los8ng over 60 court cases proves you idiots are idiots lol

 

[mark francis]

Nope reasonable Americans understand los8ng over 60 court cases proves you idiots are idiots lol

You have an unreasonable infatuation with court cases as your only 'proof' that the election was not stolen by fraud, but not a single judge's (no juries were involved) decision comes even close to disproving the 2020 democrat voter fraud. Not only that, but democrats have been losing court cases in subsequent years after lengthy investigations revealed 'errors' or 'glitches' or other flaws and election law violations that corrupted the 2020 election.

 

[pjmret]

You have an unreasonable infatuation with court cases as your only 'proof' that the election was not stolen by fraud, but not a single judge's (no juries were involved) decision comes even close to disproving the 2020 democrat voter fraud. Not only that, but democrats have been losing court cases in subsequent years after lengthy investigations revealed 'errors' or 'glitches' or other flaws and election law violations that corrupted the 2020 election.

you have an unreasonable understanding of life and the legal system. courts are exactly how intelligent americans deal with charges of fraud. Your obsession with juries shows how truly stupid you are, since these kinds of cases dont go to juries. duh.

feel free to point out any court cases where you idiots proved fraud. go for it lol

 

[mark francis]

you have an unreasonable understanding of life and the legal system. courts are exactly how intelligent americans deal with charges of fraud. Your obsession with juries shows how truly stupid you are, since these kinds of cases dont go to juries. duh.

feel free to point out any court cases where you idiots proved fraud. go for it lol

No results from responsible fraud investigations were ever presented to the dozens of courts that rejected voting fraud cases in the two months following the 2020 election.

 

[pjmret]

No results from responsible fraud investigations were ever presented to the dozens of courts that rejected voting fraud cases in the two months following the 2020 election.

prove it, lying idiot. lol

list cases that were rejected, lying idiot. you keep saying this and I keep asking you to prove it and you cowardly run away, lying idiot. lol