Trump-hating FBI official is fired for forcing FBI agents to lie to support false democrat narratives

[pjmret]

Democrats claimed vulnerable voting machines were not illegally connected to the internet on election night. They lied.

'Online and vulnerable': Experts find nearly three dozen U.S. voting systems connected to internet (nbcnews.com) and vulnerable': Experts find nearly three d

A team of election security experts used a “Google for servers” to challenge claims that voting machines do not connect to the internet and found some did.

let me know when there is any actual evidence of fraud.

 

[mark francis]

another election audit, this time in pa:

Sixty-three participating counties reviewed a statistical sample of over 45,000 randomly selected ballots from the November 3, 2020, General Election. The results of the sample mirrored the reported presidential election results across the participating counties within a fraction of a percentage point, providing confirmation of the accuracy of the vote count.

Auditing Election Results | Voting & Election Information | Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

<p>After every primary and general election in Pennsylvania, counties conduct two different types of audits to ensure the reported election outcomes are correct. Both audits occur before any results are certified.</p>

www.vote.pa.gov

Democrats are protecting their voting machines from investigators representing the entirety of the American people. What are they hiding? Several things, including vulnerabilities to corrupt manipulation in the machines themselves, the fact that the machines showed signs of being hacked and manipulated shortly before, during, or following the election, and that required tabulators turned up missing in some machines and those tabulators have never been found.

'Online and vulnerable': Experts find nearly three dozen U.S. voting systems connected to internet (nbcnews.com) and vulnerable':

Experts find nearly three d

A team of election security experts used a “Google for servers” to challenge claims that voting machines do not connect to the internet and found some did.

 

[pjmret]

Democrats are protecting their voting machines from investigators representing the entirety of the American people. What are they hiding? Several things, including vulnerabilities to corrupt manipulation in the machines themselves, the fact that the machines showed signs of being hacked and manipulated shortly before, during, or following the election, and that required tabulators turned up missing in some machines and those tabulators have never been found.

'Online and vulnerable': Experts find nearly three dozen U.S. voting systems connected to internet (nbcnews.com) and vulnerable':

Experts find nearly three d

A team of election security experts used a “Google for servers” to challenge claims that voting machines do not connect to the internet and found some did.

let me know when you have evidence of fraud.

which "democrats" are "protecting" their voting machines? be specific.
are you talking about states like georgia and arizona and pennsylvania which are controlled by republicans? lol

 

[mark francis]

another one: michigan

Out of 5.5 million Michigan ballots cast in the presidential election, auditors identified 41 potential "duplicate" votes. The Bureau of Elections referred those to Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson and Attorney General Dana Nessel for further investigation.

Michigan audit: Minimal 'duplicate,' dead voters in 2020 presidential vote | Bridge Michigan

A review by Michigan Auditor General Doug Ringler’s office prompted an investigation into 41 potential “duplicate” votes in the 2020 presidential election that former President Trump continues to protest.

www.bridgemi.com

Democrats have opposed for years and still oppose a national database of voters that can identify any voter who votes more than once in any election.

 

[pjmret]

Democrats have opposed for years and still oppose a national database of voters that can identify any voter who votes more than once in any election.

cite the proposed database and show the opposition and prove it would be a good idea, that mistakes won't be made.

Ohio Was Set to Purge 235,000 Voters. It Was Wrong About 20%.​

When Ohio released a list of people it planned to strike from its voting rolls, around 40,000 people shouldn’t have been on it. The state only found out because of volunteer sleuthing


this shows how such a database can be misused.

 

[mark francis]

on the other hand: "A Wisconsin judge said Thursday that a Republican-ordered, taxpayer-funded investigation into the 2020 election found “absolutely no evidence of election fraud,” but did reveal contempt for the state’s open records law by Assembly Speaker Robin Vos and a former state Supreme Court justice he hired."

Judge: Wisconsin probe found 'absolutely no' election fraud

A Wisconsin judge says that a Republican-ordered, taxpayer-funded investigation into the 2020 election found “absolutely no evidence of election fraud,” but did reveal contempt for the state’s open records law by Assembly Speaker Robin Vos and a former state Supreme Court justice he hired.

apnews.com

republican audits are a joke, paid for by taxpayers.

Counting and recounting unverified ballots is a joke. How can people be so stupid to think recounting illegitimate ballots will prove those ballots are illegitimate?

 

[pjmret]

Counting and recounting unverified ballots is a joke. How can people be so stupid to think recounting illegitimate ballots will prove those ballots are illegitimate?

prove they were unverified, as I already requested.

otherwise, just another lie from you

 

[mark francis]

another one: "
North Carolina State Board of Elections staff prepared this response to questions about whether it will conduct a “forensic audit” of the 2020 general election or allow the opening of random voting machines to see if they contain modems.

Forensic Audit​

The State Board and 100 county boards of elections conducted audits of results after the 2020 general election, as they do after every election. In one type of audit, bipartisan officials in every county counted every ballot by hand in two randomly selected precincts or early voting sites or absentee-by-mail ballots. Statewide, the audits showed that machine counts of ballots were accurate.

Response to Calls for a Forensic Audit of 2020, Random Opening of Voting Machines | NCSBE

NCSBE response to questions about whether it will conduct a “forensic audit” of the 2020 general election or allow the opening of random voting machines.

www.ncsbe.gov

Machine recounts of unverified ballots should reveal the accuracy of the number of ballots cast, not their legitimacy.

 

[pjmret]

Machine recounts of unverified ballots should reveal the accuracy of the number of ballots cast, not their legitimacy.

prove they were unverified.
but you can't, you just keep repeating your lie

 

[mark francis]

you can provide evidence they were wrong? no>

hahahahahahhahahah

How can anyone verify that illegitimate ballots were legitimately cast?

 

[mark francis]

they compared physical ballots to the machine count, *****. lol.

what didn't they do, exactly? prove they were "unverified" as you claim. duh.

The real ***** is the dummy who thinks recounting illegitimate ballots by machine proves their legitimacy.

 

[pjmret]

How can anyone verify that illegitimate ballots were legitimately cast?

up to you to prove that since you claim fraud. duh

obviously you can't prove it, or you should have already

 

[pjmret]

The real ***** is the dummy who thinks recounting illegitimate ballots by machine proves their legitimacy.

no, the ***** is you, who keeps claiming fraud with no proof

don't you get tired of looking stupid here? apparently not!

 

[mark francis]

let me know when you have evidence of fraud.

which "democrats" are "protecting" their voting machines? be specific.
are you talking about states like georgia and arizona and pennsylvania which are controlled by republicans? lol

Crucial Logs Missing From Michigan County Dominion Voting Machines: Forensics Report (theepochtimes.com)

A Dominion Voting Systems Election Management Server pictured in a photo from a report by Allied Security Operations Group. (Allied Security Operations Group)

MICHIGAN

Crucial Logs Missing From Michigan County Dominion Voting Machines: Forensics Report ........


‘Votes Can Be and Were Changed’

The ASOG team visited Central Lake Township on Nov. 27 to inspect the Dominion ImageCast Precinct system. Central Lake Township Clerk Judith Kosloski presented the auditors with two ballot tabulator tapes, one produced on Nov. 3 and another on Nov. 6.

Kosloski told the auditors that Connie Wing of the County Clerk’s Office instructed her on Nov. 5 to retabulate the ballots that were counted on Nov. 3. The second tabulation altered an estimated 1,474 votes in a precinct where a total of 1,494 votes were cast, the auditors estimate.

The massive shift included a school board race in which one candidate gained 742 votes and another lost 657 votes, printed tapes provided to the auditors show. In another school board race, 657 votes vanished in a second tabulation of a race that had 663 votes cast on the first count.

When the auditors visited the Antrim County Clerk on Dec. 6, they discovered that two different versions of election software were used for the machine that tabulated the Central Lake Township ballots. In total, the use of the two software versions altered more than 60 percent of the votes, “inexplicably impacting every single election contest in a township with less than 1500 voters,” the report states.

 

[mark francis]

cite the proposed database and show the opposition and prove it would be a good idea, that mistakes won't be made.

Ohio Was Set to Purge 235,000 Voters. It Was Wrong About 20%.​

When Ohio released a list of people it planned to strike from its voting rolls, around 40,000 people shouldn’t have been on it. The state only found out because of volunteer sleuthing


this shows how such a database can be misused.

Federal laws require states to periodically purge their voting rolls to hinder voting fraud. Obama took several states to court for attempting to comply with the law. Democrats despise election security laws and they fight like hell to prevent the purging of voter rolls because that narrows down the ways they can use the shrunken inflated numbers of ineligible voters to commit fraud.