Trump-hating FBI official is fired for forcing FBI agents to lie to support false democrat narratives

[mark francis]

"anomaly"? lol.

analyze any large election, you can find lots of them.
they prove nothing.

you claimed IRREFUTABLE FRAUD...and all you have is "anomolies"

hahhahaha
hahahahha


so..not a single credible independent expert agrees with you.

because of course there wasn't actual massive fraud you nimrods claimed

Your flimsy mockery of evidence that contradicts the democrat claims does not speak well of your position.

 

[mark francis]

if babies are murdered there would be news and trials, nimrod. lol.

you're so stupid

Nazis did not try Nazis for killing Jews and neither do democrats try democrats for killing babies.

 

[mark francis]

from your link: "This study reports three tests measuring vote fraud in the 2020 US presidential election, although they provide inconsistent evidence"


INCONSISTENT EVIDENCE> lol



you realize that statistics isn't proof..right? lol.
maybe you are too dumb to realize that.

You offer no rebuttal of the evidence with sound reasoning and facts.

 

[mark francis]

marK "I filed no court cases alleging fraud "

you personally did? well, lol. who said you did personally? duh.

but republicans filed a lot, and lost them all. duh.

my god you make yourself look dumber every time.

Stupidity drives the ignorant to claim no fraud occurred because few cases have made it into court against democrat obstruction. It is very difficult or even impossible to prove corrupted voting machines corrupted the vote totals in key precincts, especially since democrats refuse to allow non-democrat investigators to examine the machines (for obviously suspicious reasons.)

Democrats claim voting machines that have been examined by non-democrats are corrupted. The only pure and untainted machines, according to democrats, are those completely controlled and operated by democrats without any interference from republican observers or investigators, yet all voting machines are known to be susceptible to fraudulent manipulation. Go figure.

 

[Boris Norris]

If any non-democrat observers were blocked from observing or if any ballots were counted in the absence of observers then the democrats cannot prove the election was fair and untainted.

Why did republicans suddenly want to observe the process immediately after Trump called fraud?
When Trump won, did they do the same? Was there no fraud then?
How coincidental.

The gop paid auditers to investigate it and found nothing. Dominion sued fox for implying the machines were rigged and win. Not one of trumps challenges succeeded. He stacked the sc anticipating they would rule in his favour. That worked well.

It all comes down to you hard-line ignorant trumpoids never accepting a fair election result. There's not a sceric of evidence to suggest otherwise but youre all flapping around in a lather thinking lots of noise and hate will reverse the decision. You need to re assess you mental capacity or have it independently assessed. Your paranoid.

 

[mark francis]

Why did republicans suddenly want to observe the process immediately after Trump called fraud?
When Trump won, did they do the same? Was there no fraud then?
How coincidental.

The gop paid auditers to investigate it and found nothing. Dominion sued fox for implying the machines were rigged and win. Not one of trumps challenges succeeded. He stacked the sc anticipating they would rule in his favour. That worked well.

It all comes down to you hard-line ignorant trumpoids never accepting a fair election result. There's not a sceric of evidence to suggest otherwise but youre all flapping around in a lather thinking lots of noise and hate will reverse the decision. You need to re assess you mental capacity or have it independently assessed. Your paranoid.

The observers were illegally blocked from doing their jobs by democrat precinct workers who wanted to hide what they were doing. This was on election night, not after reports poured in later exposing democrat voter fraud.

 

[Boris Norris]

The observers were illegally blocked from doing their jobs by democrat precinct workers

It was not illegal. It is standard procedure to do it unobstructed by anyone attempting to intimidate them

who wanted to hide what they were doing.

What was it proven that they were doing to be doing illegal?
Youve made the statement now support it with evidence.

This was on election night, not after reports poured in later exposing democrat voter fraud.

I know that. There was plenty of ratbags dispensing ridiculous theories but none of them had evidence of any fraud. Furthermore, they never exposed anything be ause the tallying was not complete.

The votes are counted twice by law so the chance of fraud is virtually nil. Approximately half of the vote counters were republicans, as it should be, so you are accusing them of closing their eyes while democrats rigged it. Really?
Do you think they would have remained quiet if there was any truth in it? Of course not. Thats a completely idiotic scenario from the beginning

Like all MAGA ratbags, you don't have the capacity to think about the process. Your god was defeated democratically and because he said there was fraud, you running around repeating it like an echo as if its fact.
Surely you can't be so naive to think it was rigged but I might be wrong about assuming. Either way, youve got a lot to learn about the very system you ridicule.

 

[the annoying thing]

Nazis did not try Nazis for killing Jews and neither do democrats try democrats for killing babies.

Hes a idiot but bevis cant help it

 

[Boris Norris]

Nazis did not try Nazis for killing Jews and neither do democrats try democrats for killing babies.

Thats because democrats don't kill babies.
Are you a religious person?

 

[pjmret]

Your flimsy mockery of evidence that contradicts the democrat claims does not speak well of your position.

statistics isn't really strong evidence of actual fraud.

for example. "Benfords law" is a statistical technique that can be useful, but doesn't prove anything. statistical "anomalies" happen all the time. duh. "Social media users have been sharing posts that say a mathematical rule called Benford’s Law provides clear proof of fraud in the U.S. presidential election. However, research papers and academics consulted by Reuters consistently say that deviation from Benford’s Law does not prove election fraud took place."

 

[pjmret]

Hes a idiot but bevis cant help it

says the nimrod who doesn't understand monthly inflation. lol

 

[pjmret]

You offer no rebuttal of the evidence with sound reasoning and facts.

your own link said that the evidence was inconsistent. lol.

 

[pjmret]

Nazis did not try Nazis for killing Jews and neither do democrats try democrats for killing babies.

so democrats only "murdered babies" in democrat-run states? republicans turned a blind eye to baby killing? lol.

you're so funny

 

[pjmret]

The observers were illegally blocked from doing their jobs by democrat precinct workers who wanted to hide what they were doing. This was on election night, not after reports poured in later exposing democrat voter fraud.

which observers were ILLEGALLY blocked? provide the location and the laws that were broken.

 

[pjmret]

Stupidity drives the ignorant to claim no fraud occurred because few cases have made it into court against democrat obstruction. It is very difficult or even impossible to prove corrupted voting machines corrupted the vote totals in key precincts, especially since democrats refuse to allow non-democrat investigators to examine the machines (for obviously suspicious reasons.)

Democrats claim voting machines that have been examined by non-democrats are corrupted. The only pure and untainted machines, according to democrats, are those completely controlled and operated by democrats without any interference from republican observers or investigators, yet all voting machines are known to be susceptible to fraudulent manipulation. Go figure.

over 60 court cases were filed, and lost, by republicans. "few"? lol

voting machines which are taken out of the "chain of custoday" are, in fact, invalidated. doesn't matter who takes them. duh