Trump Embraces Authoritarian Playbook of Hungary's Orbán

Step one ...restrict the flow of information


Jeff Bezos, the self-proclaimed “hands-off” owner of the Washington Post, emailed staffers on Wednesday morning about a change he is applying to the paper’s opinion section that appears to align the newspaper more closely with the political right.


“I’m writing to let you know about a change coming to our opinion pages. We are going to be writing every day in support and defense of two pillars: personal liberties and free markets,” Bezos said.


“We’ll cover other topics too of course, but viewpoints opposing those pillars will be left to be published by others. There was a time when a newspaper, especially one that was a local monopoly, might have seen it as a service to bring to the reader’s doorstep every morning a broad-based opinion section that sought to cover all views. Today, the internet does that job.”

Bezos’s decision to inject more regular and weighty conservative theming will also see the departure of opinions editor David Shipley, although it was not immediately clear if he was fired for resisting Bezos’s direction, or chose to resign.

...

Reuters is reporting that the White House denied access to an Associated Press photographer and three reporters from Reuters, HuffPost and Der Tagesspiegel, a German newspaper.

TV crews from ABC and Newsmax, along with correspondents from Axios, the Blaze, Bloomberg News and NPR were permitted to cover the event.

This comes as on Tuesday, the Trump administration announced that it would take control of the White House press pool, stripping the independent White House Correspondents’ Association (WHCA) of its longstanding role in deciding which journalists have access to the president in intimate settings.


making judges retire at 62 would be a good next step..watch this space

comrade stalin
moscow - first in space
 
Werbung:
What is your point?

TV crews from ABC and Newsmax, along with correspondents from Axios, the Blaze, Bloomberg News and NPR were permitted to cover the event.

And you have a problem with what? This thread is a joke.
 
Not more personal liberty and free markets?

jezz bezos ?

free markets ?

not for the first time. a wicked capitalist is talking bollocks...

Today, Amazon controls about 75 percent of online sales of physical books, 65 percent of e-book sales, more than 40 percent of new book sales, and 85 percent of sales by self-published e-book authors. According to economist Paul Krugman, it has a large market share in the entire book business as Standard Oil did in 1911. Because of its dominance in the book industry, publishers are forced to deal with its bullying tactics. Like it delayed the delivery of many popular books from Hachette's imprints in order to get the terms it wanted from the company. Amazon also ask for payments from publishers to promote their books. Big publishers pay five to seven percent of a year's gross sales while small houses sometimes sell their books to Amazon at a 60 percent-plus discount.

...

It can be easily observed that Amazon is taking control of one industry after another, and making the country’s economy less diverse and innovative. It's also taking some wicked strategies such as underselling the competition. It is using its financial resources to sell some products below its own cost to eliminate less well-funded competitors. On the other hand, Amazon Prime has left rival manufacturers and retailers with little option but to become third-party sellers on its platform. One more thing, it extracts more fees from suppliers which reduces their ability to develop or invent new products. Meanwhile, it is also expanding its own product lines.

...

Amazon uses data about customers' buying habits to raise prices. It has even started charging prices, blocking access to certain products, delaying times for customers who don't join its Prime program.

Amazon denies that it is a monopoly. There is a debate among the experts whether it should be called a monopoly or not. Brittain Ladd, an expert in e-commerce, retail, strategies and supply chain management stated that Amazon is not a monopoly according to the official definition of monopoly. According to Merriam-Webster, “A monopoly occurs when complete control of the entire supply of goods or of a service in a certain area or market rests with a single entity.” So amazon can't be called monopoly yet. However, the real cost of a monopoly is not about price. It's also about stifling new business. Amazon is damaging the ability of earning or having freedom as producers. It is stunting job creation and worsening income inequality.

..

The work condition inside Amazon warehouses is not satisfying at all. After reviewing 911 calls, the Daily Beast, an American news and opinion website revealed that this tech company's work conditions are so difficult that many workers face physical and mental issues. Some of the workers even want to take their own lives. The workers of Amazon noted that they can't even take bathroom breaks whenever they want. Generally, workers work for 10 hours in Amazon warehouses where there is no window or proper air conditioning. Amazon workers are not allowed to talk or interact with one another in this long period. East African Amazon workers in Minneapolis complained as they are not getting fair religious treatment. They said that this company just allots them two 15-minute break and one 30-minute break which are not enough time for Muslims to pray. They also rallied for this. Amazon workers across Europe have participated on Black Friday 2018 to protest work conditions.

There is no doubt that Amazon is one of the most powerful companies in the world which is becoming a monopoly day by day. However, it is leading customers in a darker future.


comrade stalin
moscow-on-the-woke
 
Start an anti Amazon thread then. Prior to July 1994 when Bezo's started selling out of his garage Amazon did not sell a single book to anybody. Was the world better off then?

Nobody is forced to buy anything from them.
 
You have strayed so far from the original topic that you have virtually created a new thread.

Nobody is forced to buy gas for their car either.

Yet if they do, it is from a cartel masquerading as free enterprise.

Sure, amazon started off as a garage startup. but as the years have gone by, it has become corrupted.


comrade stalin
moscow
 
making judges retire at 62 would be a good next step..watch this space

comrade stalin
moscow - first in space

why make them retire when your brownshirts can do the job for you..

"..US Marshals have warned federal judges of unusually high threat levels as the tech billionaire Elon Musk and other Trump administration allies ramp up efforts to discredit judges who stand in the way of White House efforts to slash federal jobs and programs, said several judges with knowledge of the warnings.

In recent weeks, Musk, congressional Republicans and other top allies of Donald Trump have called for the impeachment of some federal judges or attacked their integrity in response to court rulings that have slowed his administration’s moves to dismantle entire government agencies and fire tens of thousands of workers.

Musk, the world’s richest person, has lambasted judges in more than 30 posts since the end of January on his social media site X, calling them “corrupt”, “radical”, “evil” and deriding the “TYRANNY of the JUDICIARY” after judges blocked parts of the federal downsizing that he has led. The Tesla CEO has also reposted nearly two dozen tweets by others attacking judges.

Reuters interviews with 11 federal judges in multiple districts revealed mounting alarm over their physical security and, in some cases, a rise in violent threats in recent weeks. Most spoke on condition of anonymity and said they did not want to further inflame the situation or make comments that could be interpreted as conflicting with their duties of impartiality. The Marshals Service declined to comment on security matters.

As Reuters documented in a series of stories last year, political pressure on federal judges and violent threats against them have been rising since the 2020 presidential election, when federal courts heard a series of highly politicized cases, including failed lawsuits filed by Trump and his backers seeking to overturn his loss. Recent rhetorical attacks on judges and the rise in threats jeopardize the judicial independence that underpins America’s democratic constitutional order, say legal experts.

US supreme court Chief Justice John Roberts, in his annual year-end report in December, warned about a rising number of threats to the judiciary’s independence, including calls for violence against judges and “dangerous” suggestions by elected officials to disregard court rulings they disagree with.

On social media, Musk and Republican lawmakers have described judges as threats to democracy, turning the role of the federal judiciary – a branch of government created to check executive and congressional power – on its head. ‘‘The only way to restore rule of the people in America is to impeach judges,’’ Musk wrote in one post. “No one is above the law, including judges.”


comrade stalin
canada
 
next step

cut off funding to anyone who disagrees with the agenda of those who bribe you

"...The Donald Trump administration announced on Friday that it had canceled $400m in federal grants and contracts to Columbia University in New York because of what it alleges is the college’s repeated failure to protect students from antisemitic harassment.

The announcement comes after Columbia set up a new disciplinary committee and initiated its own investigations into students critical of Israel and its war on Gaza after Hamas’s own attack on Israel. That move by the university has alarmed advocates of free speech.

It also comes at a time of widespread backlash to American universities by the Trump administration and conservatives more broadly who see the higher education sector in the US as dominated by liberals and ripe for a rightwing attack


many of the protestors are brave young jewish people appalled by what is being done in the name.

FACT : Zionist lickspittle adelson is frump's biggest briber. This stifling of free speech and support for atrocity and war-crime has her fingerprints all over it.

Trump met with Adelson in February 2024, and she supported Trump in the 2024 United States presidential election.
In May 2024, Politico reported that Adelson will contribute $90 million to a Super PAC supporting Trump. At this time the Biden’s campaign account had $84 million cash, and Trump's had $49 million (not accounting for PAC dollars).

Miriam Adelson sought support from candidate Trump for Israel's annexation of the West Bank, pledging more than $100 million to Trump’s campaign in exchange for U.S. recognition of Israel’s sovereignty over the region.


comrade stalin
moscow

So there you have it. Frump has been bribed to the tune of $100 million to support an annexation of an illegally occupied territory .



https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/feb/27/barnard-palestine-protest
 
Werbung:
Back
Top