This is what's wrong with USA.

Werbung:
Phoenix68 said:
.
View attachment 6811
.
"DUDE....CHECK IT OUT....I PUT A TALKING SNAKE IN THIS ONE!!!!"
.​
Click to expand...
Fascinating. Too long to read all of it. But enough to get the point, (beaten to death,) that the immutable Bible had more mutations than a virus. And the fact that a veritable Bible simply does not exist.

No star of Bethlehem?! Holy Moly. And no three wise men in the earliest Biblical versions?! Jumping Jehoshaphat!, people had better change their Christmas cards, songs, and front yard manger scenes.
 
pjmret said:
says the ***** still desperately claiming th eelection was stolen even though 100% of judges disagree. lol
Click to expand...
No, not 100%, but 0% of the judges offered proof that the entire body of massive evidence of widespread voter fraud was fraudulent.
 
mark francis said:
Don't try to use judges to support your claim that no fraud existed while maintaining judges did not investigate the claims of fraud attending the evidence.
Click to expand...
I use judges to point out that you morons were too stupid to convince even Trump judges lol
 
Werbung:
pjmret said:
I use judges to point out that you morons were too stupid to convince even Trump judges lol
Click to expand...
Judges and courts have ruled against fraud, like this case in which the judge ruled Dominion machines corruptible and in violation of election laws.

curling-v-raffensperger-rulling-101120.pdf (voterga.org)

Courts found Dominion machines vulnerable to corruption and in violation of election laws.

B. Claims Relating to BMDs, Scanners/Tabulators, and Audits
1. Cybersecurity Risks and Reliability Issues Presented by Implementation of the BMD System

The evidence, expert opinion testimony, and argument Plaintiffs offer in support of their challenge to the constitutionality of the State Defendants’ implementation of a barcode-based system for all in-person voting falls into three main areas. They contend that the evidence shows:

(1) The QR barcode-based BMD voting system does not produce a voterverifiable paper record of the votes cast. Therefore, voters will be unable to conduct any verification of the information encoded in the non-human readable barcode, will have no way of knowing what votes they are actually casting, and will instead be forced to trust that the barcode accurately conveys their intended ballot selections. Both the QR barcode recording of votes and the text summary of ballot selections are subject to being accessed and manipulated through hacking, unauthorized intrusion into the BMD computer system or its various components (scanner, printer, etc.), by USB flash drives (or similar devices), or by other 20 For a variety of reasons, local precinct polling stations end up sending emergency ballots to their Counties’ election office for scanning and tabulation rather than handling this themselves. Local precincts in the past have treated emergency ballots like provisional ballots that must be sent to the County office for a determination to be made of voter eligibility. However, consistent with current state regulations, precincts processing emergency ballots are authorized to allow voters to cast and scan their own emergency ballots, assuming voting equipment is operational.Case 1:17-cv-02989-AT Document 964 Filed 10/11/20 Page 19 of 14720interfaces with the internet through cyber attacks or applications that may be carrying malware (whether intentionally or not).

(2) The QR barcode-based BMD voting system poses major security and fidelity of vote issues because the BMD system is susceptible to significant cybersecurity risks and manipulation through hacking access to any one of its multiple components (BMD, printer, scanner) and through untraceable manipulation or alteration of code. The QR barcode is not encrypted and may also be a vector of data system manipulation.

(3) The QR barcode-based BMD voting system is incapable of being meaningfully audited for a variety of reasons: (a) the QR code cannot itself be verified by a voter; (b) the length and complexity of many ballots and the printed ballot text’s condensed mode of summarizing the voter’s ballot selections (identifying solely the candidate selected by office or condensed constitutional amendment summaries identified by question number or by a few words); and (c) research reflecting that most voters do not review these printed ballot summaries, and those that do, will not detect errors in ballots presented for verification based solely on their memories.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Jim415
US media, politicians mobilize against Sochi Olympics
Replies
1
Views
2K
pocketfullofshells
pocketfullofshells
Back
Top