The unethical, immoral, unjust, Trump-hating, election interfering, leftist Democrat lawfare prosecutor is now under investigation for her crimes

[mark francis]

Aside from the references found in the texts of antiquity, such as the story of Sodom and Gomorrah found in Genesis in the Bible, the first recorded references of criminalisation in English law date back to two medieval treatises: Fleta (1290, written in Latin) and Britton (circa the start of the 14th century, written in Norman French).
The treatises show that the common law at the time, tried in ecclesiastical rather than secular courts, saw sodomy as an offence against God with the punishment of being buried alive in the ground or burnt to death. The latter punishment was applied to “sorcerers, sorceresses, renegades, sodomites and heretics publicly convicted.”

1533


"loving" christians applied the death penalty to adult consenting sex.
hateful

Feel free to condemn the ancients if you disagree with their views back then.

 

[pjmret]

Feel free to condemn the ancients if you disagree with their views back then.

ancients? hardly ancients since those laws were in effect until the 1900s.
not to mention other laws persecuting them like forbidding marriage.

you are a hateful and cowardly person who can't admit christians have a history of persecuting gays.

 

[mark francis]

The Buggery Act 1533​

In England, when King Henry VIII made his break with the Catholic Church, much of the former ecclesiastic law tried in the ecclesiastical courts had to be revised and incorporated into secular law to be tried by the state. This included many sexual offences such as the Acte for the punishment of the vice of Buggerie, punishable by death, passed as an Act of Parliament during Henry VIII’s reign.

hateful christians.

William Tyndale, the father of the KJV Bible, burned at the stake by clergymen in 1536

 

[mark francis]

Offences Against The Person Act 1828​

In England, it took nearly 300 years for the Buggery Act 1533, introduced by Henry VIII, to be replaced by the Offences Against the Person Act 1828. The new Act narrowed the offence to focus solely on male same-sex activity, still punishable by death.

death penalty for consenting adults.
hateful

I could not find that the Person Act of 1828 had so much to do with sodomy as it condemned rape and sex with animals, crimes that I also consider serious enough to warrant harsh penalties.

 

[pjmret]

I could not find that the Person Act of 1828 had so much to do with sodomy as it condemned rape and sex with animals, crimes that I also consider serious enough to warrant harsh penalties.

right from your post, *****:

"narrowed the offence to focus solely on male same-sex activity, still punishable by death."

my god you're stupid.

you are such a hateful coward. you can't admit the truth, that christians persecuted gays for centuries.

 

[mark francis]

The Indian Penal Code 1860 (IPC) was drafted on the recommendations of Lord Thomas Babington Macaulay and devised to ‘inculcate European morality into resistant masses.’ So began the process of enforcing Victorian morality throughout the Empire. Section 377 of the IPC was the crime of ‘unnatural offences’ which criminalised ‘carnal intercourse against the order of nature’ with a penalty of imprisonment for life.

"good" news, now its "merely" imprisonment for life for consenting adult sex.
hateful

Morality is good, whether ancient lawmakers tried forcing it on citizens or not.

 

[pjmret]

William Tyndale, the father of the KJV Bible, burned at the stake by clergymen in 1536

so what? another pathetic attempt by a hateful coward to deflect.

 

[pjmret]

Morality is good, whether ancient lawmakers tried forcing it on citizens or not.

death for consenting adult sex is hateful and evil.

 

[mark francis]

The Criminal Code of the Australian colony of Queensland was drafted in 1899 by the colony’s chief justice, Sir Samuel Griffith, and came into force in 1901.

The Code expanded the terms of criminalisation established under the Indian Penal Code to criminalise both partners who engage in male same-sex activity.

more hate from "christians.

I found no evidence that Sir Samuel Griffith was a professing Christian, much less a respected one for fame of his (nonexistent?) faith.

 

[mark francis]

so what?

you still can't admit that christians have a history of persecuting gays.
you are a cowardly hateful disgusting person

I don't accuse you of hating whites and Christians and you are way out of bounds for accusing me of supporting persecution of gays. I no more persecute gays than you do.

 

[mark francis]

they were christians, *****. those were christian countries run by christians.

you are a cowardly hateful person who can't admit christians persecuted gays for centuries.

My forefathers came to America to get away from those so-called Christians.

 

[pjmret]

My forefathers came to America to get away from those so-called Christians.

they were christians.
your attempt to excuse their evil is disgusting

 

[mark francis]

ancients? hardly ancients since those laws were in effect until the 1900s.
not to mention other laws persecuting them like forbidding marriage.

you are a hateful and cowardly person who can't admit christians have a history of persecuting gays.

The laws you complain about were drafted by lawmakers, not faithful, respectable, and devout Christians.

 

[pjmret]

I don't accuse you of hating whites and Christians and you are way out of bounds for accusing me of supporting persecution of gays. I no more persecute gays than you do.

you are disgusting for not condeming the historical persecution of gays by christians.
all you do is attempt to deflect and excuse their behavior.
stop being a hateful coward.

 

[pjmret]

The laws you complain about were drafted by lawmakers, not faithful, respectable, and devout Christians.

they were drafted by christians.
you are a disgusting coward to try and excuse the evil done by christians in persecuting gays