The future of the Trump political dynasty on the ballot

[mark francis]

Exactly. Why would it. He had every right to do what he did and SC approval to do it.

Here is the SC decision on the matter. You will note the figure of only 2 billion was mention. It also says they may claim it, which was never in dispute, but they didn't.
The SC DID NOT have jurisdiction to prevent Obama from sending it. You are wrong.

Victims of Terror Can Seize Iranian Money, Supreme Court Rules

Victims of terrorist attacks backed by Iran can collect nearly $2 billion in Iranian money held by a New York bank, the Supreme Court ruled Wednesday.

www.nbcnews.com

Obama stole the money and gave it to undeserving Iranian mass murderers of American servicemen before the SOCUTUS finally released the money to be claimed by the American terror victims. No wonder the American victims never claimed the money. By the time SCOTUS ruled they could claim the money Obama had already stoilen it.

 

[mark francis]

If the Supremes could have prevented Obama from sending the money, then the money would never have been sent.

Obama proved he felt he did not need Congress or courts telling him what to do.

https://www.npr.org/2014/01/20/263766043/wielding-a-pen-and-a-phone-obama-goes-it-alone

Wielding A Pen And A Phone, Obama Goes It Alone​

JANUARY 20, 20143:36 AM ET
HEARD ON MORNING EDITION

Tamara Keith
LISTEN· 4:474-Minute ListenPLAYLIST

• Download
• Embed
  
  
• Transcript

Wielding A Pen And A Phone, Obama Goes It Alone​

LISTEN· 4:47PLAYLIST

• Download
• Embed
  
  
• Transcript

President Obama has alluded to his pen and his phone as two tools that help him act without waiting for congressional approval.
Getty Images
President Obama has a new phrase he's been using a lot lately: "I've got a pen, and I've got a phone."
He's talking about the tools a president can use if Congress isn't giving him what he wants: executive actions and calling people together. It's another avenue the president is using to pursue his economic agenda.

 

[Boris Norris]

Obama stole the money and gave it to undeserving Iranian mass murderers of American servicemen before the SOCUTUS finally released the money to be claimed by the American terror victims. No wonder the American victims never claimed the money. By the time SCOTUS ruled they could claim the money Obama had already stoilen it.

Same.old shit.
Obama abided by the law. You lose. Suck eggs.

 

[mark francis]

Same.old shit.
Obama abided by the law. You lose. Suck eggs.

What law states that Obama could decide on his own whether or not to give the Shah's money to terrorists or, instead, to American victims of terror without having to wait on the SCOTUS to rule on the matter?

 

[Boris Norris]

What law states that Obama could decide on his own whether or not to give the Shah's money to terrorists or,

The process was passed by Congress. Deal with it.

instead, to American victims of terror without having to wait on the SCOTUS to rule on the matter?

The SC didn't have the right to rule on it. You're inventing scenarios to suggest Obama acted illegally. You lose.

 

[mark francis]

The process was passed by Congress. Deal with it.

Congress authorized giving the money to American victims of Iranian terror. Obama ignored the dictates of Congress, the decision of courts, and the will of the American people in order to give stolen money to his and Valerie's Muslim pals in Iran.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

Typical Trump Fraud

 

[mark francis]

Typical Trump Fraud

Biden cannot inspire the numbers of public supporters that Trump can, yet he will likely again win the 2024 election by millions of questionable ballots.

 

[Boris Norris]

Congress authorized giving the money to American victims of Iranian terror. Obama ignored the dictates of Congress, the decision of courts, and the will of the American people in order to give stolen money to his and Valerie's Muslim pals in Iran.

You said it was the SC.
Show us where congress objected to Obama.

 

[mark francis]

You said it was the SC.
Show us where congress objected to Obama.

Supreme Court Rules For Congress -- And Thousands Of Victims Of Iran-Sponsored Terrorism

The ruling means Iran's central bank must pay terror claims.

www.huffpost.com

NEWSPOLITICSENTERTAINMENTLIFEPERSONALVOICESSHOPPING PLAY PYRAMID SCHEME
U.S. EditionOpen editions


POLITICSSUPREME COURTLAWSCOTUS

Supreme Court Rules For Congress -- And Victims Of Iran-Sponsored Terrorism​

The ruling means Iran's central bank must pay terror claims.


By Cristian Farias
Apr 20, 2016, 07:42 PM EDT

https://facebook.com/share.php?u=ht...aign=share_facebook&ncid=engmodushpmg00000003


https://facebook.com/share.php?u=ht...aign=share_facebook&ncid=engmodushpmg00000003

The Supreme Court ruled that a law that directed a specific result in favor of victims of Iran-sponsored terrorism does not violate the Constitution.
POOL NEW / REUTERS
WASHINGTON -- For a moment Wednesday, the three branches of the federal government seemed to line up in perfect harmony -- if only to show their support for victims of Iran-sponsored terrorism.

 

[Boris Norris]

Supreme Court Rules For Congress -- And Thousands Of Victims Of Iran-Sponsored Terrorism

The ruling means Iran's central bank must pay terror claims.

www.huffpost.com

NEWSPOLITICSENTERTAINMENTLIFEPERSONALVOICESSHOPPING PLAY PYRAMID SCHEME
U.S. EditionOpen editions


POLITICSSUPREME COURTLAWSCOTUS

Supreme Court Rules For Congress -- And Victims Of Iran-Sponsored Terrorism​

The ruling means Iran's central bank must pay terror claims.


By Cristian Farias
Apr 20, 2016, 07:42 PM EDT

https://facebook.com/share.php?u=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/supreme-court-iran-terrorism_n_5717dacde4b0c9244a7ab2cc?utm_campaign=share_facebook&ncid=engmodushpmg00000003


https://facebook.com/share.php?u=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/supreme-court-iran-terrorism_n_5717dacde4b0c9244a7ab2cc?utm_campaign=share_facebook&ncid=engmodushpmg00000003

The Supreme Court ruled that a law that directed a specific result in favor of victims of Iran-sponsored terrorism does not violate the Constitution.

Note that? No laws broken? Where's your argument now dickhead.
You posted and proved you're a liar.

POOL NEW / REUTERS
WASHINGTON -- For a moment Wednesday, the three branches of the federal government seemed to line up in perfect harmony -- if only to show their support for victims of Iran-sponsored terrorism

 

[mark francis]

Note that? No laws broken? Where's your argument now dickhead.
You posted and proved you're a liar.

Obama cannot explain where he got the money and why he took it upon himself to give the money to terrorists 4 previous presidents would not do because the case was still in court and remained in court until 2 months after Obama prematurely settled the case on his own with nothing but a pen and a phone.

 

[Boris Norris]

Obama cannot explain where he got the money and why he took it upon himself to give the money to terrorists 4 previous presidents would not do because the case was still in court and remained in court until 2 months after Obama prematurely settled the case on his own with nothing but a pen and a phone.


View attachment 13547

Those accusations have cobwebs all over them.
It's finished and you lost.

 

[mark francis]

Those accusations have cobwebs all over them.
It's finished and you lost.

Democrats are famous for obstructing investigations into leftist crimes hoping the crimes will be forgotten over time without ever resulting in criminal charges being brought.