Well your posts are really mixed up. You think military action is not bombing. You think many us on this board are warmongers who love killing, including myself, while you agree with bombing Syria and killing Syrians.
You make many WRONG conclusions about me in your ridiculous posts. As all the regulars here at the HOP know, I am a libertarian (formerly a conservative). I do not think military action of any sort should be taken by the US, exceptions for being attacked. I firmly believe and have posted my opinions here numerous times...I am for a non-interventionist foreign policy. I did not support Bush in nearly everything he did domestic or foreign...he was a stinking progressive statist...just as BO is.
You apparently think BO is somehow different than Bush. You condemn the right for siding with Bush and not BO. But, you fail to condemn the Left for siding with BO and not Bush. Do you fail to see the hypocrisy of your position?
You have come to this board with many misconceptions. You think anyone who criticizes Big Ears, must love W. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Most, and not all, who criticize Obama are the same ones who supported Bush when he did the same. Likewise, they are the same who now blame Obama for the pathetic condition of the economy when he is simply following the "strategy" set forth by Bush. All one has to do is look at the posts of ones like the teabagger, or Cruella, and it becomes readily apparent. Very few seem to be able to comprehend that Obama is simply an extension, or perhaps the culmination, of a plan that was set forth long ago, and no matter how often I ask them to read about the history Imperial Presidency then never seem to be able to accomplish that. And that is what I criticize the "right" for. I really can't think of anything I have supported Obama on, yet when I point out the truth of a mater it is always interpreted as support for Obama. Then begin the catcalls of me being a "leftie", or whatever. Kind of like labeling me a "war monger" when I asked the question of should international law be supported, or not.
Now, many on this board do support killing, etc., when it came to Bush, and to deny that is to deny reality. It would appear they have had an "epiphany" since Obama was elected, however, like the teabagger did just a few posts back, they still defend Bush. Now, I have found over the years that those who most often support the actions of Bush are cowards just as Bush was, and Cheney, Gingrich, Romney, Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck, Rumsfield, Rove, and the list goes on, were, and are. And if you were to watch the talk shows on Fox, C-Span, etc., it is these same chicken hawks that now support bombing Syria.
As to defending the left, please read my posts with clarity. I have defended only one thing, and that is the truth. Being an independent since the second term of Reagan, for whom I voted the first time, and not the second (and have not voted for either party since), my responses may appear to be a defense of the left. However, that is not my intent. If those in here lie about Obama, I will point it out. That is my sole intent. If I go to a liberal forum, and they lie about the right, I point it out. I do not intend to support either point of view, just the truth.
