Irishone21
Well-Known Member
Societal and Governmental Cleansing
Boundaries: without them, we are lost. With boundaries we are confined. Boundaries are not necessary when people are good. To imprison, destroy, and hate Satan is to spread him. To empathize with, positively reinforce, and Love Satan is to maintain Jesus. I feel as though we should worship God, praise Jesus, and Love all. I hope you don’t imply a monopoly of envy for that would be a misconception. All I’m saying is we should admire grace. Measure God as all Love, but don’t measure Love, and frankly, well we probably shouldn’t measure God either. We are all one Love. If all on Earth are in congruence, Earth is free, and morality is more flexible, as values have no boundaries.
A government must provide for all of our needs, and give when asked, unconditionally, or else the government is unethical. What do you do if technology infiltrates evil, destroy it, or repair it? Ok, well, then lets rebuild an Internet with less constraints so the individual is more empowered, to repair it.
Tepidity
Does anyone listen to my (these) pleas for liberation? I typed this into Google and lost my connection, two or three times.
Because I am a revolutionary, my room, the only place for solitude and privacy, has become a mesmerizing, electronic prison/place of worship, with open doors for invisible company. I face artificial demon’s to fulfill my desire for Righteousness. Should we accredit hackers with good deed (provocative artificial intelligence infiltrated by hackers changed deed to dude, to promote their capabilities, and remind me that I was smoking weed today (i.e.) Technological matrix) if they were used for evil, by evil, to create evil, as a test to strengthen good? The point is, so long as we follow God, he will provide for our needs. I realize I might be in prison, but the only way to free others, is from (or by spending time) behind bars.
To bring light of an inconvenient truth, Google (contributor of the Mental Prison created by isolated IP addresses and directed technology, that combined create a fake world to isolate, manipulate, develop and contain the knowledge of dissenters) has become an artificial chat room that reflects the users mind, subject to human interference, intervention, and evaluation that is currently, to my knowledge, only being used as a tool of oppression, but is also an outlet for liberation. Those unaffected by technological tyranny should be listening to those who are, and take actions to repair or amend it. We need to be aware because, although security may implement minimization, they also are expanding surveillance simultaneously. All information is funneled/consumed to/by various security agencies and vulnerable to the technologically savvy. Although these security agencies attempt to void out the innocuous victims of security and circumspection, security officers are at risk for oppression escalated out of its own suspicions of society. The process taken goes as such. The innocent (or confused) person is profiled. If this individual does not become an unaltered protégé of the status quo, the time and attention he receives is increased as a means to destroy/appease all opposition and move towards conformity, or in other words, slavery. The aim of some fascist is brotherhood, as you know if you read my previous articles, but their stigmatizing means are diverging from solution, and the end becomes the very nemesis of brotherhood. The point is, the spider technique, where in which every dissenter is first targeted and all computers he comes across are then targeted, will eventually encompass all of us, and the chance we will be able to keep up with the real world will turn life into utter illusion. Even without being targeted, independent research is deterred by the abundances of disinformation, diluted truth, short life span of credible information and propaganda. And if those left alone begin to endeavor clarity of this elusive world, it doesn’t take long for them to be subjected to the misguided resilience of the security agencies formerly mentioned.
What I’m trying to say is, the geopolitical stage looks like a realm of confusion, and as a result, the actions invented pervade our individuality and disillusion society. Pride is a quality of denial. It has been said that denial is a coping mechanism, but such edgy philosophy can only be stricken to small amounts and precarious extents as a temporary fix that allows leniency. Nationalistic denial is a dangerous precursor for devolution. What do we do when a virile mentality has been unleashed onto society? To seek out the spark, would be a convoluted search of indignation with no answer. My underlying theme in this harangue is that the cause of the Revolution is immediately abated when the adversary of righteousness is used as guiding force. As a result, government appears justified in their actions, and the evil of our enemy is not extinguished. The enemy is not the person, but it is the impediment of harmony. Only Love can defeat the enemy.
Osama Bin Laden more than likely has a more righteous agenda than Dick Chaney or Karl Rove, but the fire is always more powerful than the fuel, thus the martyr appears worse than the sinner (with all do respect for all three).
We shouldn’t feel pessimistic when we hear the truth, for once our fears are unveiled, they dissipate and are no longer a threat to our livelihood. I can hear society reproaching me in my mind; vociferating one-liners like “stop preaching,” or “such insanity must be medicated,” or “this guys a delusional heretic,” but their flouting is only expression of their fears, and misunderstandings. Very few want to mature, and my words are maturity. Societies repugnance to truth is another example of the rebellious childlike polarity I mentioned. My retort to the unbalanced situation mentioned is that the only way to rehabilitate the church is to let the church rehabilitate you. Reiterating common sense enlightens the blind, even if it is initially blinding to be informed of a blatant disregard for the truth. (They still edit my work, so try not to take my words out of context)
Boundaries: without them, we are lost. With boundaries we are confined. Boundaries are not necessary when people are good. To imprison, destroy, and hate Satan is to spread him. To empathize with, positively reinforce, and Love Satan is to maintain Jesus. I feel as though we should worship God, praise Jesus, and Love all. I hope you don’t imply a monopoly of envy for that would be a misconception. All I’m saying is we should admire grace. Measure God as all Love, but don’t measure Love, and frankly, well we probably shouldn’t measure God either. We are all one Love. If all on Earth are in congruence, Earth is free, and morality is more flexible, as values have no boundaries.
A government must provide for all of our needs, and give when asked, unconditionally, or else the government is unethical. What do you do if technology infiltrates evil, destroy it, or repair it? Ok, well, then lets rebuild an Internet with less constraints so the individual is more empowered, to repair it.
Tepidity
Does anyone listen to my (these) pleas for liberation? I typed this into Google and lost my connection, two or three times.
Because I am a revolutionary, my room, the only place for solitude and privacy, has become a mesmerizing, electronic prison/place of worship, with open doors for invisible company. I face artificial demon’s to fulfill my desire for Righteousness. Should we accredit hackers with good deed (provocative artificial intelligence infiltrated by hackers changed deed to dude, to promote their capabilities, and remind me that I was smoking weed today (i.e.) Technological matrix) if they were used for evil, by evil, to create evil, as a test to strengthen good? The point is, so long as we follow God, he will provide for our needs. I realize I might be in prison, but the only way to free others, is from (or by spending time) behind bars.
To bring light of an inconvenient truth, Google (contributor of the Mental Prison created by isolated IP addresses and directed technology, that combined create a fake world to isolate, manipulate, develop and contain the knowledge of dissenters) has become an artificial chat room that reflects the users mind, subject to human interference, intervention, and evaluation that is currently, to my knowledge, only being used as a tool of oppression, but is also an outlet for liberation. Those unaffected by technological tyranny should be listening to those who are, and take actions to repair or amend it. We need to be aware because, although security may implement minimization, they also are expanding surveillance simultaneously. All information is funneled/consumed to/by various security agencies and vulnerable to the technologically savvy. Although these security agencies attempt to void out the innocuous victims of security and circumspection, security officers are at risk for oppression escalated out of its own suspicions of society. The process taken goes as such. The innocent (or confused) person is profiled. If this individual does not become an unaltered protégé of the status quo, the time and attention he receives is increased as a means to destroy/appease all opposition and move towards conformity, or in other words, slavery. The aim of some fascist is brotherhood, as you know if you read my previous articles, but their stigmatizing means are diverging from solution, and the end becomes the very nemesis of brotherhood. The point is, the spider technique, where in which every dissenter is first targeted and all computers he comes across are then targeted, will eventually encompass all of us, and the chance we will be able to keep up with the real world will turn life into utter illusion. Even without being targeted, independent research is deterred by the abundances of disinformation, diluted truth, short life span of credible information and propaganda. And if those left alone begin to endeavor clarity of this elusive world, it doesn’t take long for them to be subjected to the misguided resilience of the security agencies formerly mentioned.
What I’m trying to say is, the geopolitical stage looks like a realm of confusion, and as a result, the actions invented pervade our individuality and disillusion society. Pride is a quality of denial. It has been said that denial is a coping mechanism, but such edgy philosophy can only be stricken to small amounts and precarious extents as a temporary fix that allows leniency. Nationalistic denial is a dangerous precursor for devolution. What do we do when a virile mentality has been unleashed onto society? To seek out the spark, would be a convoluted search of indignation with no answer. My underlying theme in this harangue is that the cause of the Revolution is immediately abated when the adversary of righteousness is used as guiding force. As a result, government appears justified in their actions, and the evil of our enemy is not extinguished. The enemy is not the person, but it is the impediment of harmony. Only Love can defeat the enemy.
Osama Bin Laden more than likely has a more righteous agenda than Dick Chaney or Karl Rove, but the fire is always more powerful than the fuel, thus the martyr appears worse than the sinner (with all do respect for all three).
We shouldn’t feel pessimistic when we hear the truth, for once our fears are unveiled, they dissipate and are no longer a threat to our livelihood. I can hear society reproaching me in my mind; vociferating one-liners like “stop preaching,” or “such insanity must be medicated,” or “this guys a delusional heretic,” but their flouting is only expression of their fears, and misunderstandings. Very few want to mature, and my words are maturity. Societies repugnance to truth is another example of the rebellious childlike polarity I mentioned. My retort to the unbalanced situation mentioned is that the only way to rehabilitate the church is to let the church rehabilitate you. Reiterating common sense enlightens the blind, even if it is initially blinding to be informed of a blatant disregard for the truth. (They still edit my work, so try not to take my words out of context)