Let the Meek Lead
The government blames the society, when it is their fault. I realize hatred creates a mirror image, but how else can we send our message? If we try to hard to be devoid of hate, we will appear fake, and become ignored. Do they understand, hate is the masquerade of Love? If we change and restore value in the American Government, the world will follow. The government resorts to temporary fixes, which causes them to spend too much time controlling soceity, as oppose to leading. My possessions do not need to be controlled. Is the government not concerned of the affects of their espionage, or are they ignorant of them, or worse, or they paralysed by fear of terrorist? BIGBROTHER justified a nation full of manipulaters, deceivers, hackers, crackers, and technological terrorist. Creating counter-terrorist, is multiplying terrorist. This is pathetic. Too much ego is arrogance, which our government has achieved. Too little ego, is submission or conformity. Many people have submitted, and turned from the government, trusting or neglecting those who deceive, but I do not, and I hope soon or later, you won't either. The people are divided because the government is engaged in duplicity, claiming the art of war is justified, when it is not. The art of war is a primitive document, which we have advanced too far to still use. We must seek to upgrade the mentalities of our brothers in the Middle East, by having compassion for them, and creating a mutual understanding that lets them know that we are an ally, not an enemy. American law is too complex. People are living in fear of the law, not respect. Virtue will show through the simplicity of the law. Preach cooperation, and work to merge dichotomies in America, creating a nation full of people who are equally wealthy. Once we fix the states, nations will follow, with our assistance. Do not claim this is not possible, for you would be lying. Stop enslaving yourself to the power of the dollar and pessimistic understandings of human nature. The minimum wage should be no less than $15 an hour. If businesses cannot afford this, the government will assist the deficit in their budget so that they can. There are many other means to gain money. One of which is cut military spending. There are numerous solutions, but they are ignored, for as a result of this war, the government neglects domestic concern. Tell the world good intentions, and than pursue them, without fear or hesitance. Instead of abolish terrorist, listen to them, cooperate with them, call them brothers with sincerity, earn their trust with persistence and modest desire to have it, defeating the threat and saving the relationship. If there were no poverty, there would be no war, or significantly less war. Unity is only possible when there is non-coerced equality. If people are equally poor, or equally miserable, their liberties will be lost in conformity, and no problems will be solved. The opposite is brotherhood, which allows absolute liberty and equality. Wives of the government are just as fooled as the people, too caught up in the lust of power to realize the injustice of their spouse who is so blind he thinks he is in the right. I do not serve the American Government. I serve God. I expect a confession. I anticipate honesty. Sooner or later, the government will yield to the Revolution.
The greatest leader of men is he who follows and understands God the most. This does not make him a Sheppard, only an empathetic sheep that tries to ensure no sheep gets lost. If a sheep doesn't want to be saved, don't frustrate him by imposing beliefs, let him be free, but leave the door home open. Nor does this make him a saint, for the challenges he faces cause him/her to sin more frequently, or lose himself in the process, especially if he is not supported.
Why do I only see spiritual entities when I’m crying or emotional? How does it comfort me so well without talking? How can we achieve Love, without all the pain? Is the pain love inflicts just a result of unrequited Love, the rest joyous emotion? Why don’t we Love to resolve conflicts?
"Collectives "reach agreement", they "arrive at consensus", OR, they "find some balance"."
Individuals are powerless and meek alone. Collectives (us, the people) need to force the government to reach agreement. We need extreme measures that don’t sacrifice value to make an impact. Once we earn back power, we need to suggest significant, but still gradual change, which most likely they would call skipping steps, when in reality, anything less is not changing anything at all. We all basically agree, so why can’t we pursue Revolution and fix the problems they avoid, neglect, and failed to solve?
"Now, in terms of "capability", the gov obviously has the edge, right? I mean, how do you tame a rampaging elephant? You can't "make it stop", right? What you really need to do, is to "convince it that it wants to stop", right? If you want it to stop, you gotta make sure it understands it's in its own best interests to stop. The only other option, is "warfare", which is kind of a non-sensical concept in this space, right? The elephant would just put its foot on your head and that'd be the end of the war. So, you gotta stay out from under the elephant's feet, right?"
You realize the same things I realize, except we shouldn’t fear the “elephants feet,” especially if we are not acting alone. Under no situation whatsoever should we let them restrict our liberties. Our dignity is important, and we must fight for it. This is not India, and the consequences of a collective, peaceful Revolution will not be as severe, and so long as we are united, and have our values in check, will be successful, not disruptive or destructive. As long as we agree to listen to our conscience, or our superego, we will be in the clear, for God protects those who are obedient and sincere.
There is bound to be a disagreement at some point, but rather than endlessly debate, we should try to overcome the obstacles to our unity. Or as my brother said, embrace our similarities, as oppose to bicker over our disagreements. We will let a vote solve disagreement. I see what you mean though; ones will is their individual’s choice. That is beside the point though. Instead of voting on the president, why not vote on the issues? Will this be too slow, and not as efficient? Once the people's voice is heard, an elective can represent the people, as oppose to them. This will solve the concern with democracy. In regards to war, however, I don't trust the people, at least no until problems are solved, and people are awakened. A righteous, spiritually enlightened dictator should get us out of this war (a philosopher king) and then, the people can be told the truth about everything. When will the people swallow there pride, and take this risk? Who is fit to uphold this responsibility? I mean, I was chosen by God, but that doesn't mean the people want me, nor do I think my place with God is secure, and acting in defiance to his value, will leave me waiting as well, which is probable, since I don't like to leave anyone behind. Do we fear the answer? Do we fear peace? Or do we accept what is common? Why do we trust in the art of war, and censure the principles of peace? Clearly the art of war has not worked out, but we still denounce the principles of peace when they have not been giving a full trial. Spiritually enlightened does not imply Christian warlord, or radical and violent Muslim both of whom misinterpret God, in fact, it is just the opposite. This dictator must get his government to free constraints on information, and give media both sides, as it will be beneficial to them just as much to the people. He must preach value (not impose beliefs, express them), deference to God, and respect to all religions that advocate Love. He must begin to merge dichotomies, taking whatever steps necessary to do this. If we lead by example, demonstrate positive reinforcement, and have mutual understanding with people, other nations will cooperate. Then the issues, which require debate like abortion and such, can be voted on.
