question for liberals about the middle east

The Biblical character called "God" makes no attempt to make himself intelligible to people. Eat this, don't eat that, wear this, don't wear that. Punishing the children and grandchildren and generations far n the future for minor "sins" of their parents. No reason given at all.

Ham stares at Noah's dick and all Black people should therefore be given menial jobs and enslaved because of it.
oh wow...yeah...DO. NOT. Get it.
 
Werbung:
The root of the problem according to God is that the wicked are incapable of understanding God.
No, the root of the problem is that the Biblical character called "God" is a nasty and vindictive and murderous fool who could not possibly be any sort of God of Love. He tells Abraham to sacrifice his son, like a goat. He makes a dumb bet with Satan and tortures his most loyal follower, Job with every imaginable malady and catastrophe. He then somehow allows Mohammad to be born, gives him many talents and then converts most of the Middle East to Islam.

The Biblical "God" is a cruel and incompetent buffoon.

Again, Jesus said when he would return, and he failed to return. If you think he is returning, you are just nuts.
 
With all due respect, i think it is much higher...and the reason people think that there is a small number of radicalized is that their friendly muslim neighbors aren't radicalized until the time is right. THAT IS, Until their more radicalized brethren have the upper hand. We've already seen this in certain middle eastern towns where Christian and muslim lived together peaceably UNTIL one of those radicalized groups such as hammas, al qaeda, etc came in and took over and then those neighborly muslims were turning on and turning in their christian neighbors for extermination. LIke Haman wanted his Persian fellowmen to do when he ordered the extermination of all jews on a certain date in the provinces of Persia and the murderers could confiscate the property of those they killed. Much like now actually.
what is your basis for thinking it is "much higher"? other than hate and ignorance of course
 
Those who try to understand the Bible while rebelling against God are idiots.

no, god is very clear to everyone. he condones slavery and genocide.
those who try to deny it are the true idiots. you're just embarassed by the evil your god condones
 

question for liberals about the middle east​

f Israel was to over the People of Palestine state hood and give them 94 percent of the land they want, would they be peaceful and stop the terrorist attacks ?
Or would they continue their terrorist attacks ? As they have vowed to destroy Israel along with Iran whose backing them.
.
relaxing-outside-smiley-emoticon[1].gif
.

Your punctuation is exceptionally fucked-up.....much like your (lack of) knowledge of Middle East / U.S. history.
.
Blood and Oil - A Middle East Primer
.
.

CIA Confirms Role in 1953 Iran Coup
.
 
People need to understand everything on its own merits, the Bible included.
The Bible sees slavery as totally okay, and the only form of government mentioned in it is hereditary monarchy. It is a document from a past time.

Jesus clearly said when he would return, and then he did not show up.
First he said that he did not know the day or the hour, but that God the Father did. So Jesus admits that he does not have the knowledge that God does.
Then he said that he would surely return before the last of the group he was speaking with had tasted death. (a rather strange metaphor).

So either Jesus did not actually appear as he promised, or there is a disciple still around after about 2000 years.

There is nothing more to comprehend about this. Jesus said what he would do, and then he did not do as he promised.

Paul thought that Jesus would pop up very very soon. But again, he did not.
 
People need to understand everything on its own merits, the Bible included.
The Bible sees slavery as totally okay, and the only form of government mentioned in it is hereditary monarchy. It is a document from a past time.

Jesus clearly said when he would return, and then he did not show up.
First he said that he did not know the day or the hour, but that God the Father did. So Jesus admits that he does not have the knowledge that God does.
Then he said that he would surely return before the last of the group he was speaking with had tasted death. (a rather strange metaphor).

So either Jesus did not actually appear as he promised, or there is a disciple still around after about 2000 years.

There is nothing more to comprehend about this. Jesus said what he would do, and then he did not do as he promised.

Paul thought that Jesus would pop up very very soon. But again, he did not.
Unchurched amateurs make poor Bible teachers.
 
Werbung:
Back
Top