Putin picks Giggles

Biases judge dismissals of fraud cases does nothing to disprove evidence of voting fraud.
Prove all the Cases were dismissed by biased judges legal *****
You lost them all which does nothing to disprove the fact you are a legal moooron
 
Werbung:
Prove all the Cases were dismissed by biased judges legal *****
You lost them all which does nothing to disprove the fact you are a legal moooron
What did 'we lose?" Court standing? Certainly our loss had nothing to do with courts actually examining voting fraud evidence in court trials because none of that ever happened.
 
What did 'we lose?" Court standing? Certainly our loss had nothing to do with courts actually examining voting fraud evidence in court trials because none of that ever happened.
you lost the cases. duh. the ones you mooorons started and claimed would show fraud. and didn't lol

and of course courts examined evidence, moooron. its what courts do.

god you are dumber than a box of rocks. by a lot lol
 
prove they were not ,

Judge skewers GOP lawsuit to throw out AZ election, citing total lack of evidence​


Humetewa wrote that the plaintiffs were “sorely wanting of relevant or reliable evidence” to back up their implausible claims of massive election fraud, which included allegations of foreign espionage along with more mundane accusations of illegally cast ballots.

Trump Campaign Has ‘No Credible Or Reliable Evidence’ Proving Voter Fraud, Nevada Court Rules​


A state judge in Nevada dismissed with prejudice the Trump campaign’s lawsuit trying to overturn the state’s election results Friday, ruling the campaign had no evidence to prove its allegations of voter fraud


took me 5 seconds to make you and mark look like the hateful mooorons you are. lol
 

Judge skewers GOP lawsuit to throw out AZ election, citing total lack of evidence​


Humetewa wrote that the plaintiffs were “sorely wanting of relevant or reliable evidence” to back up their implausible claims of massive election fraud, which included allegations of foreign espionage along with more mundane accusations of illegally cast ballots.

Trump Campaign Has ‘No Credible Or Reliable Evidence’ Proving Voter Fraud, Nevada Court Rules​


A state judge in Nevada dismissed with prejudice the Trump campaign’s lawsuit trying to overturn the state’s election results Friday, ruling the campaign had no evidence to prove its allegations of voter fraud


took me 5 seconds to make you and mark look like the hateful mooorons you are. lol
that didnt prove anything lug nut .
 
now back to the subject at hand . of course Putin wants giggles he views here as weak and poor at bargaining . He would much prefer her over trump who he know he can only screw with so much before he bites back.
 
now back to the subject at hand . of course Putin wants giggles he views here as weak and poor at bargaining . He would much prefer her over trump who he know he can only screw with so much before he bites back.
now back to the subject at hand. of course putin wants trump, "america first" and opposed to ukraine aid.
trump has no interest in "biting back" over ukraine. "america first' mooron.

god you are beyond stupid
 

Judge skewers GOP lawsuit to throw out AZ election, citing total lack of evidence​


Humetewa wrote that the plaintiffs were “sorely wanting of relevant or reliable evidence” to back up their implausible claims of massive election fraud, which included allegations of foreign espionage along with more mundane accusations of illegally cast ballots.

Trump Campaign Has ‘No Credible Or Reliable Evidence’ Proving Voter Fraud, Nevada Court Rules​


A state judge in Nevada dismissed with prejudice the Trump campaign’s lawsuit trying to overturn the state’s election results Friday, ruling the campaign had no evidence to prove its allegations of voter fraud


took me 5 seconds to make you and mark look like the hateful mooorons you are. lol
There is no end to the congo line of liars willing to support democrat dishonesty with deceptive articles filled with misrepresented facts and avoidance of truths that nobody can refute.
 
God you are so stupid
It proved judges looked at the evidence
Proving mark was wrong
Duh
Your propaganda piece may 'prove' that biased judges 'looked' at voter fraud evidence and 'concluded' the evidence is invalid but your democrat-inspired pablum piece does not prove judges allowed open discussions of the evidence in court before non-biased juries for a valid court ruling.
 
now back to the subject at hand. of course putin wants trump, "america first" and opposed to ukraine aid.
trump has no interest in "biting back" over ukraine. "america first' mooron.

god you are beyond stupid
Of course 'everybody knows' Putin wants Trump because that is what Hillary and the democrat party told them. Truthfully, however, Hillary and her cronies have been refuted time and again for lying about the fake Trump/Russian favoritism theory she and her cronies invented as a 2016 campaign trick.
 
Werbung:
Of course the American people lost voting fraud cases the deep state threw out of court without a public hearing or a trial before a jury.
you are so stupid. lol. these kinds of cases dont go to juries.

you make rocks look smart
 
Back
Top