First there was nothing and then it exploded. Who can argue with that?I think we should let science explain evolution of life and evolution of the universe until it really hits a brick wall.
First there was nothing and then it exploded. Who can argue with that?I think we should let science explain evolution of life and evolution of the universe until it really hits a brick wall.
I liked what someone said earlier about how even if there is some kind of supreme being that created the universe, that doesn't mean it has a human form... i mean what if its some enormous electrical cloud that spasms and poof a universe is made hahaha
PLC1, I'm 67 years old, and I'm still not sure about anything. I have a few ideas, that I've learned from here and there, but that's all they are, just ideas. I don't think we should expect anything more than that, or take our selves and our opinions that seriously.
52 years old, and you're still not sure whether there is a god. After over 100 pages of discussion, no one on this board has proven it one way or the other.
We're asked to believe the completely ridiculous notion that the complex web of life on this planet happened all by itself with no intelligent guidance, or the equally incredible concept of an unseen being who created it all.
I think there is a little agnostic in all of us.
The first paragraph of this site sums up pantheism fairly well.
Pantheism is a class of belief, not a specific religion. In the above definition, I think the use of the words God and religion are misleading because they carry along the baggage of other unrelated religions. I don't consider that I believe in God, but I still find a sort of sanctity in existence. The best "liturgy" of pantheism for me doesn't involve a church, but involves studying science. In that sense one "worships" the creation and not the creator.
52 years old, and you're still not sure whether there is a god. After over 100 pages of discussion, no one on this board has proven it one way or the other.
We're asked to believe the completely ridiculous notion that the complex web of life on this planet happened all by itself with no intelligent guidance, or the equally incredible concept of an unseen being who created it all.
I think there is a little agnostic in all of us.
C'mon numy. Times are a changing. Bring yourself up to date. Quantum Mechanics can be fun too.Sounds very much like brane cosmology -- lagboltz' most favorite topic in the world.
C'mon numy. Times are a changing. Bring yourself up to date. Quantum Mechanics can be fun too.
Every time I say "quantum mechanics" you think I am talking about string theory. I am not talking about string theory. I am talking about quantum mechanics.I'm not the one constipated from brane cosmology, am I? As I said, 3 spatial dimensions and 1 time dimension is the way to go. No mental gymnastics required. Complexity almost always lead to more bs.
Every time I say "quantum mechanics" you think I am talking about string theory. I am not talking about string theory. I am talking about quantum mechanics.
String theory is a subset of quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanics is not a subset of string theory.
So, my conclusion is that you are the one constipated from brane cosmology. Try to get it out of your head.
Thanks for the added research Lag.
Ok, for all you Atheists out there: Let's hear your argument against the existence of God.