Openmind
Well-Known Member
Now, to get the thread back on track, if possible, the so called Dream Act is seen as a pro illegal alien stance by some.
Others see it as helping out kids who were brought to the USA as children, and now can't attend college because of their status.
I knew a high school student in that position. He spoke perfectly good English, had good grades, had gone through twelve years of school in the US, and yet was an illegal alien. He still is, as far as I know.
Should he be shipped back to his country of birth, even if he isn't familiar with it? Or would it be terrible to give this kid and others like him amnesty and declare them to be legal residents?
Is the kid to blame for his parents having brought him here when he was little?
And, can anyone answer that question without the use of silly and undefined terms like "lib" and "conservative", and ranting about how stupid or bigoted the other side is, or using the absurd term "pro illegal"?
If you've read my posts on the subject, BTW, you know my position, and it is far from open borders.
As I said before, it is such a complex issue that I am still struggling with it.
What I know for sure, is that it is not fair to punish the children for their parent's poor decisions. So I believe that for these children/young adults, there should be a path to citizenship that doesn't involve having to leave the country where they grew up, and begin the application process (which can take years) from scratch.
But what is the solution? I'm not sure. But the dream act as it stands, with the conditions of qualifications as they stand, doesn't seem like a bad plan. Another element that could be added to it is to request that these special cases of illegal Americans children (because, that's the way I think of them), be requested to find a sponsor that would assure that these youths would NOT be dependent on government funds (such as unemployment, welfare, etc.) for at least 2 years after the beginning of the process of naturalization, but, if the need arose, that their sponsors would support them during those two years.
The reason I am thinking of this is because this type of mechanism is already in place for immigrants coming in the US legally (i.e., my son met and married a young Australian woman while he was a Marine, and to allow her to join my son in the U.S. and receive her green card, we had to sponsor her for two years, thus promising that she would not be at the charge of any government programs during that time.)