I have no idea what you are talking about because it's just more nonsense.
If you're talking about my wife yes she was calling you and idiot. Look up Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center (DLIFLC) Primary Intelligence Language Center, Monterey California.
Besides English she speaks fluent Swedish, French and what the Army wanted her for... Russian.
I'm very familiar with DLI, as I attended it in 1972!
What I'm calling BS on is your assertion that she has had any commentary on the subject AT ALL! If she has an opinion to express on the subject, let HER express it, otherwise, you're just talking trash to bolster your flawed BS, especially since NEITHER of you is old enough to actually
remember the tensions of the times that JFK created.
You know there is no sense even talking to you. A Socialist a Marxist a Communist. You actually wanted a Fidel Castro with these world philosophies forcefully taking over a country 90 miles off our shores... not to mention stealing all of our American financial interests in Cuba. Well President Eisenhower certainly didn't and neither did President Kennedy.
You obviously have no clue WHAT a Socialist, a Marxist, or a Communist is if you can't see the differences. FYI, there are many, MANY Socialists in America today, especially prevalent inside the DNC, and even serving in our own Congress, but they are NOT Communist. We have a few, if not fully, at least borderline Socialists on this board, but I daresay they are not Communists! Marxism is a PHILOSOPHY, not a practical application, while Communism IS the application. Your naive interpretation is as absurd as saying that because America was founded on Christian principles that it is a theocracy!
Also, my opinion of Castro, and what was done about him are two entirely different things. I firmly believe in the admonition of President George Washington, in his farewell address, that
"The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is, in extending our commercial relations to have with them as little political connection as possible. So far as we have already formed engagements let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith. Here let us stop." . Since you never served, perhaps your wife can explain to you why so many military men are so opposed to STUPID politicians, and their STUPID policies that get GOOD MEN KILLED for no damned reason whatsoever!
Castro was NOT A THREAT to the United States, and would have been but one of dozens of penny-ante Banana Republic dictators, so there was absolutely no reason for us to engage him militarily as we did at the Bay of Pigs. If Kennedy had been using the big head instead of the little one, we could have dealt with Castro POLITICALLY, retained our trade relations with him, and used that trade as our weapon to influence his policies. JFK, by attempting to enforce the very Pax Americana that he would later decry, propelled that penny-ante dictator onto the world stage, and created a situation that had never existed. As I said before, JFK
MADE Castro who he is, and has been for the past 45+ years.
Wife now called you a yet zhopa... and if memory serves me I believe that's Russian for ones lower posterior.
Well, tell your wife "Ihr Ehemann ist zu dumm procreate gewährt zu werden. Sie müssen sehr hoffnungslos in der Tat gewesen sein, solch ein ***** verbunden zu haben."
WHEN CASTRO BECAME A COMMUNIST:
The Impact on U.S.-Cuba Policy
Salvador Diaz-Verson
Pure pablum by a Batista. Your "source" claims that Castro had Communist ties as early as 1943. The problem with that is that in 1943, Castro was only 17 YEARS OLD, and still living at home with his parents! This is nothing but another primary example of superficial and selective reasoning to support an unsupportable position. The exiled Cubans are still so invested in discrediting Castro and trying to entice the US to overthrow him that they continue to resort to flat out lies in their efforts. Isn't there enough BAD about Castro for them to simply tell the truth, and deal with it from there?
Diaz-Verson, a distinguished Cuban journalist and intelligence officer, gathered evidence of Castro's connection with the Soviet Union dating back to 1943. His account of when Castro became a communist is of importance from a U.S. policy perspective; it is both historically significant and contextually accurate. Cuba established diplomatic relations with the Soviet Union in October 1942 with Maxim Litvinov having presented his credentials in April 1943.(38) Given that Cuba had the strongest Communist Party in Latin America at the time "regarded as a sort of Caribbean regional headquarters"(39) in which the "Soviet government placed a high value,"(40) it is not unthinkable that Castro did indeed come under the influence of Gumer W. Bashirov in the early months of 1943 as Diaz-Verson has described in his seminal paper reprinted below entitled "When Castro Became A Communist."
SOURCE
Now, either Diaz-Verson, an alleged "intelligence officer", was a pathalogical liar, or he's simply STUPID, but in either case, anyone who can do basic MATH can quickly see that he's a "legend in his own mind".