more harm to america from trump's anti-american election lies

[pjmret]

They briefly examined maybe .02% of all voting fraud evidence and ruled without involving juries or reational debate that the very limited evidence they looked over briefly did not persuade them there was widespread voter fraud across the nation in 2020.

they briefly examined maybe .02%?
you'll have to prove that, lying idiot.
but you wont because you are a lying idiot. lol

you never get tired of looking stupid. lol

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

Trump's goal is to add our country to the Trump Organization, an institution rather like the Mafia.

 

[Boris Norris]

They briefly examined maybe .02% of all voting fraud evidence

Hold on. Who said it was voter fraud evidence? .02 % of exactly how many votes?

and ruled without involving juries or reational debate

How can a jury be involved in that? Who were they supposed to debate it with? A row of chairs?
You're losing old man.

that the very limited evidence they looked over briefly did not persuade them there was widespread voter fraud across the nation in 2020.

Exactly. I'm pleased you finally agreed.

 

[mark francis]

Hold on. Who said it was voter fraud evidence? .02 % of exactly how many votes?



How can a jury be involved in that? Who were they supposed to debate it with? A row of chairs?
You're losing old man.


Exactly. I'm pleased you finally agreed.

You ask how much of all the existing evidence of voting fraud as well as how much of all future uncovered evidence of voting fraud judges examined in the few weeks after the election. Not very much.

 

[mark francis]

Trump's goal is to add our country to the Trump Organization, an institution rather like the Mafia.

Democrats who have been giving billions of dollars in kickback money to mass murderers around the world are just as guilty of mass murder as are the mass murderers they are financing in their corrupt money-making deals, using US taxpayer dollars to enrich both the terrorists and themselves in the dirty schemes.

 

[pjmret]

Democrats who have been giving billions of dollars in kickback money to mass murderers around the world are just as guilty of mass murder as are the mass murderers they are financing in their corrupt money-making deals, using US taxpayer dollars to enrich both the terrorists and themselves in the dirty schemes.

right wing blather. lol.
kickbacks blah blah blah.

you must enjoy looking stupid

 

[mark francis]

right wing blather. lol.
kickbacks blah blah blah.

you must enjoy looking stupid

Democrat devotees do not want to know if US politicians were funding crooks, thieves, thugs and terrorists overseas in wicked kickback schemes involving billions of US taxpayer dollars.

 

[pjmret]

Democrat devotees do not want to know if US politicians were funding crooks, thieves, thugs and terrorists overseas in wicked kickback schemes involving billions of US taxpayer dollars.

i'd like to know...if you have proof of them of course.
which you never do. lol

 

[Boris Norris]

You ask how much of all the existing evidence of voting fraud as well as how much of all future uncovered evidence of voting fraud judges examined in the few weeks after the election. Not very much.

That's because there was not very much to start with.
You lost son. Get over it.

 

[mark francis]

That's because there was not very much to start with.
You lost son. Get over it.

You are right. There had been practically no responsible investigations into voting fraud before courts and lawmakers moved on with certifying the tainted election without seriously addressing the massive evidence of fraud.

 

[Boris Norris]

You are right. There had been practically no responsible investigations into voting fraud before courts and lawmakers moved on with certifying the tainted election without seriously addressing the massive evidence of fraud.

The sixty judges including the ones appointed by Trump disagreed.
Give it up son. You're flogging a dead horse.

 

[pjmret]

You are right. There had been practically no responsible investigations into voting fraud before courts and lawmakers moved on with certifying the tainted election without seriously addressing the massive evidence of fraud.

so you're saying right wing fools were lazy and stupid and whiners? lol

investigations happened in a number of states and found nothing. you couldn't convince a single judge your evidence was credible.

intelligent people understand what that means, but no one ever accused right wing fools of being smart

 

[mark francis]

The sixty judges including the ones appointed by Trump disagreed.
Give it up son. You're flogging a dead horse.

They disagreed about what? Did they claim they examined every evidence of fraud available in the two weeks following the election and declared the evidence proved democrats did not commit widespread voting fraud? No, that is not what the courts did.

 

[mark francis]

so you're saying right wing fools were lazy and stupid and whiners? lol

investigations happened in a number of states and found nothing. you couldn't convince a single judge your evidence was credible.

intelligent people understand what that means, but no one ever accused right wing fools of being smart

Dozens of courts rejected voting fraud cases before there had been any sufficient investigations into the fraud allegations.

 

[pjmret]

Dozens of courts rejected voting fraud cases before there had been any sufficient investigations into the fraud allegations.

i keep asking you to list those rejected cases and you never do.
because you are a lying idiot and apparently you enjoy looking stupid lol