Massachussetts Senate Seat

chestnut

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2008
Messages
1,222
Wouldn't it be a slap in the face if Brown won?
It's incredible that the dems are struggling to secure this victory!

What could this be telling us?
That even the liberal people in that state understand that Obama's policies would drag the country down even further.

Not just that, but Massachussetts already pays for Health Care for all. They would be paying for it again. Maybe those folks are catching on to the Obama catastrophe.

We can just hope they do.
 
Werbung:
In many respects they were the guinnea pigs for the disasterous policies Obama is pushing. Its not at all surprizing that they are so willing to push back. With Kennedy gone there will be no power to look out for their interests and they already see the devistation the administration has brought up close and personal. Especially with health care.

Next Tuesday will be very interesting.
 
I can not wait for Tuesday, I am so excited :) I really want this guy to win.


My yahoo email that has never connected to any political places got several spam emails from John Freaking Kerry (who served in Vietnam) and moveon.org asking for money for the democrat who thinks all the terrorists left afganistan.

Even during the National election that email never got this spam, they are desperate.

Tuesday will be better than any foot ball game :)
 
Wouldn't it be a slap in the face if Brown won?
It's incredible that the dems are struggling to secure this victory!

What could this be telling us?
That even the liberal people in that state understand that Obama's policies would drag the country down even further.

Not just that, but Massachussetts already pays for Health Care for all. They would be paying for it again. Maybe those folks are catching on to the Obama catastrophe.

We can just hope they do.

*****************************************
But isn't it really odd that the GOP seems to be sitting back on it's laurels and just having this wait and see attitude about Mr. Brown...nothing should be taken for granted {IMO} and if they don't step up and offer more they {GOP} maybe standing around later wondering 'would have/should have/could have' and it will be all over :o

READ THIS ARTICLE>
http://www.bostonherald.com/news/po...ng_more_in_senate_battle/srvc=home&position=0

GOP lets Scott Brown fend for himself

Local Republicans outraged committee not giving more in Senate battle

HillaryChabot.jpg
By Hillary Chabot
Tuesday, December 29, 2009

OP U.S. Senate candidate Scott Brown has been all but abandoned by the same national Republican committees that pumped hundreds of thousands in campaign cash to former governors Mitt Romney and William Weld during their long-shot bids for U.S. Senate.
The snub has outraged local Republicans who say national conservatives should be jumping at the chance to nab the first open Senate seat in decades despite Brown’s tough odds in the Jan. 19 special election.
“They need to give Scott a level playing field,” said former state GOP chairman Peter Torkildsen. “It’s one of those rare opportunities that a Republican has a good shot in Massachusetts.”
But even Brown has downplayed his lack of national GOP firepower in his race against Democrat Martha Coakley, saying, “We’re doing very, very well on our own, and I don’t want to be beholden to anybody at this point.”
Colin Reed, spokesman for the National Republican Senatorial Committee, said, “I would never say how much we’re going to spend or not spend on a candidate publicly. I wouldn’t detail our battle plans.”
Local operatives say the national GOP and the NRSC have donated voter lists, telephone systems and at least $50,000 to Brown’s effort.
But that support is barely a blip when compared to the intense GOP involvement in the unsuccessful but vigorous Romney and Weld Senate bids.
In 1994, NRSC’s leader, then-Sen. Phil Gramm, vowed an “all out effort,” during Romney’s underdog battle against Sen. Edward M. Kennedy. The national party boosted Romney’s campaign coffers by $540,000 - the legal limit - in so-called coordinated spending.
National GOP committees and big-money donors funneled cash to Weld during his 1996 race against Sen. John Kerry through GOPAC, a political action committee, and wealthy backers of former House Speaker Newt Gingrich. Weld was also feted that year at a $1,000-a-person GOP gala in Washington, D.C.
While several local GOP party operatives are quietly grumbling that the RNC and the NRSC haven’t given Brown, a Wrentham state senator, enough help to mount a serious challenge for the open Senate seat, Bay State GOP spokeswoman Tarah Donoghue insists that, “They are providing the resources Scott needs. We’re working incredibly closely with them.”
But Larry Sabato, director of the University of Virginia Center for Politics, said, “The Republicans have a good chance to pick up several or more Senate seats in November, which would eliminate the Democratic 60-seat edge. They’re not going to go on any kamikaze missions.”
Meanwhile, their Democratic counterparts have swung into action, appointing Sen. John F. Kerry as the chairman of a coordinating committee to funnel national donations to Coakley, the attorney general. The committee has recently attracted top fund-raiser Jon Patsavos, but a Coakley spokesman would not say how much the organizations have helped raise.
 
*****************************************
But isn't it really odd that the GOP seems to be sitting back on it's laurels and just having this wait and see attitude about Mr. Brown...nothing should be taken for granted {IMO} and if they don't step up and offer more they {GOP} maybe standing around later wondering 'would have/should have/could have' and it will be all over :o

READ THIS ARTICLE>
http://www.bostonherald.com/news/po...ng_more_in_senate_battle/srvc=home&position=0

GOP lets Scott Brown fend for himself

Local Republicans outraged committee not giving more in Senate battle

HillaryChabot.jpg
By Hillary Chabot
Tuesday, December 29, 2009

OP U.S. Senate candidate Scott Brown has been all but abandoned by the same national Republican committees that pumped hundreds of thousands in campaign cash to former governors Mitt Romney and William Weld during their long-shot bids for U.S. Senate.
The snub has outraged local Republicans who say national conservatives should be jumping at the chance to nab the first open Senate seat in decades despite Brown’s tough odds in the Jan. 19 special election.
“They need to give Scott a level playing field,” said former state GOP chairman Peter Torkildsen. “It’s one of those rare opportunities that a Republican has a good shot in Massachusetts.”
But even Brown has downplayed his lack of national GOP firepower in his race against Democrat Martha Coakley, saying, “We’re doing very, very well on our own, and I don’t want to be beholden to anybody at this point.”
Colin Reed, spokesman for the National Republican Senatorial Committee, said, “I would never say how much we’re going to spend or not spend on a candidate publicly. I wouldn’t detail our battle plans.”
Local operatives say the national GOP and the NRSC have donated voter lists, telephone systems and at least $50,000 to Brown’s effort.
But that support is barely a blip when compared to the intense GOP involvement in the unsuccessful but vigorous Romney and Weld Senate bids.
In 1994, NRSC’s leader, then-Sen. Phil Gramm, vowed an “all out effort,” during Romney’s underdog battle against Sen. Edward M. Kennedy. The national party boosted Romney’s campaign coffers by $540,000 - the legal limit - in so-called coordinated spending.
National GOP committees and big-money donors funneled cash to Weld during his 1996 race against Sen. John Kerry through GOPAC, a political action committee, and wealthy backers of former House Speaker Newt Gingrich. Weld was also feted that year at a $1,000-a-person GOP gala in Washington, D.C.
While several local GOP party operatives are quietly grumbling that the RNC and the NRSC haven’t given Brown, a Wrentham state senator, enough help to mount a serious challenge for the open Senate seat, Bay State GOP spokeswoman Tarah Donoghue insists that, “They are providing the resources Scott needs. We’re working incredibly closely with them.”
But Larry Sabato, director of the University of Virginia Center for Politics, said, “The Republicans have a good chance to pick up several or more Senate seats in November, which would eliminate the Democratic 60-seat edge. They’re not going to go on any kamikaze missions.”
Meanwhile, their Democratic counterparts have swung into action, appointing Sen. John F. Kerry as the chairman of a coordinating committee to funnel national donations to Coakley, the attorney general. The committee has recently attracted top fund-raiser Jon Patsavos, but a Coakley spokesman would not say how much the organizations have helped raise.

Frankly, the fact that this seat is even contested is basically a victory for Republicans.

If someone told you a year ago that there would be a dead heat between the R and D for Ted Kennedy's Senate seat would you have believed them?
 
Frankly, the fact that this seat is even contested is basically a victory for Republicans.

If someone told you a year ago that there would be a dead heat between the R and D for Ted Kennedy's Senate seat would you have believed them?



Note the date on the article. He's received quite a lot of money since then as a reward of melting her 30 pt lead.
 
Frankly, the fact that this seat is even contested is basically a victory for Republicans.

If someone told you a year ago that there would be a dead heat between the R and D for Ted Kennedy's Senate seat would you have believed them?
And as with most 'POLLS' that show such things...I believe in the vote count...but this won't be a dule event either way!
Dogtowner said: Note the date on the article. He's received quite a lot of money since then as a reward of melting her 30 pt lead.
But my point was the 'GOP' not stepping up and pouring tons of funds around this state for him to utilize...it's not like they haven't done it in the past...so why are they standing idly by and being so scroogy with the campaign funds...this is an important state for the Republicans to turn around...don't cha know :rolleyes:
 
Who would have thunk it?
I guess they are getting more and more desperate. LMAO at the libs in Mass and on the hill. Now it's supposed that PBO is supposed to go to Mass and help out the now trailing Coakley.

When will this administration learn that the country does not want this socialist agenda. They are being hammered in every poll and in every election.. where they are supposed to have huge margins of victory.



Sen Schumer calls Brown a right wing tea-bagger.


Schumer Pulls 'Tea-Bagger' Card on GOP Candidate Brown

FOXNews.com

New York Sen. Charles Schumer, who famously hammered then-Sen. Alfonse D'Amato for calling him a "putz-head" in their hot 1998 campaign, was accused Thursday of stepping into the gutter himself after he sent out a fundraising e-mail in which he called Massachusetts Republican Senate candidate Scott Brown a "far-right tea-bagger."


print email share recommend (9)
New York Sen. Charles Schumer, who famously hammered then-Sen. Alfonse D'Amato for calling him a "putz-head" in their hot 1998 campaign, was accused Thursday of stepping into the gutter himself after he sent out a fundraising e-mail in which he called Massachusetts Republican Senate candidate Scott Brown a "far-right tea-bagger."

The two-term Democrat, in accusing Brown of being aligned with the conservative "tea party" movement, used a term that every tea party critic knows refers to a sexual act.

"Chuck has a way of saying things that I don't think he really understands or means, and it's unfortunate," Brown told Fox News Thursday when asked about the e-mail. "I'm not into name-calling. ... so shame on Chuck."

Liberal television hosts had a field day with the "tea bag" term last year when the tea party movement gained steam. It seemed to lose its luster after the joke got old, but Schumer brought it back as he urged supporters to vote for Democrat Martha Coakley in next Tuesday's high-stakes special election.

"Martha Coakley is running to fill the rest of Ted Kennedy's term, and her opponent is a far-right tea-bagger Republican," Schumer wrote.

Critics pointed out that Schumer cried foul in 1998 after D'Amato called him a "putz-head" during a meeting with Jewish supporters. The Yiddish word "putz" literally means "penis," though it has taken on a less vulgar meaning in common usage. Schumer, a Brooklyn congressman at the time, seized on D'Amato's insult and blasted the three-term Republican senator right up until the election for initially denying that he said it.

Schumer won the election, was re-elected in 2004 and is seeking re-election again this year.
 
As I suspected, Brown is a progressive. The progressive fix is in no matter who wins. And yet, the Left/Dems continue to proclaim differences between the parties. It keeps their followers in line.

What a joke.

By doing so, I can estimate Brown’s ideological score very precisely. It turns out that his score is –0.17, compared with her score of 0.02. Liberals have lower scores; conservatives higher ones. Brown’s score puts him at the 34th percentile of his party in Massachusetts over the 1995-2006 time period. In other words, two thirds of other Massachusetts Republican state legislators were more conservative than he was. This is evidence for my [Boris's] claim that he’s a liberal even in his own party. What’s remarkable about this is the fact that Massachusetts Republicans are the most, or nearly the most, liberal Republicans in the entire country!
http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2010/01/scott-brown-is-liberal-republican.html
 
As I suspected, Brown is a progressive. The progressive fix is in no matter who wins. And yet, the Left/Dems continue to proclaim differences between the parties. It keeps their followers in line.

What a joke.
Are you tossing the towel in so early...are you hedging your bets that he's going to loose...I hear the gap between them is really closing very fast...it could go down to the wire for vote counts before a winner is announced!
 
Are you tossing the towel in so early...are you hedging your bets that he's going to loose...I hear the gap between them is really closing very fast...it could go down to the wire for vote counts before a winner is announced!

Can you read and comprehend?

As I stated, it does not matter who wins. Both candidates are progressives.
 
Werbung:
Ok, so you are throwing the towel in...GEEZ LOUISE, just cause your guy is a looser don't go gettin you undies in a bunch...;)

He's not my guy. He's yours.

Progressives think all Rs are conservatives. That is their first mistake, but their elitist leaders know this and exploit it every day.
 
Back
Top