Liberals at it again inn Chicago what will it add up to by tomorrow end

[pjmret]

I know. I posted one of the few audit reports that were done and Democrats erupted with one voice with their predictable blind rejections of the facts.

What facts were rejected *****
List them

Of course the asog report was full of lies they don't count

 

[mark francis]

All of them duh

Post-election lawsuits related to the 2020 U.S. presidential election - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Go through them all if you would like lol

After the 2020 United States presidential election, the campaign for incumbent President Donald Trump and others filed and lost at least 63 lawsuits[1] contesting election processes, vote counting, and the vote certification process in multiple states, including Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.[2] Among the judges who dismissed the lawsuits were some appointed by Trump himself.[3]

No judge has ruled that voter fraud in 2020 was either nonexistent or insignificant, a fact Democrats cannot seem to understand and certainly cannot refute.

 

[Boris Norris]

Trump is still popular with voters in spite of everything the crooked Democrats have done thus far. They falsely accused him of colluding with Russians. They falsely accused him of trying to force Ukraine to dig up dirt on the Biden crime family. They falsely accused him of complicity in murder when a protester was killed in Charlottesville. They falsely accused him of inciting violence on Jan 6. They falsely accused him of not working with officials to sort out documents they thought he should not have kept, including damning info on Hillary's involvement in the fake Russian conspiracy theory she invented, and so forth.

Of course he's innocent and that's why he is being charged with all these crimes.
37 different charges. First time in history a past poor POTUS is charged with stealing and mishandling secret info. Then there's the inciting violence in j6, investigation and his salience with stormy.
And so it goes on.

I'm prepared to ensure you take your denial of the facts to your grave because god doesn't admit liars in heaven.

 

[mark francis]

Legal analysis and reactions​

Loyola Law School professor Justin Levitt said "[t]here's literally nothing that I've seen yet with the meaningful potential to affect the final result".[46] Ohio State University election law professor Ned Foley noted "[y]ou have to have a legal claim, and you have to have evidence to back it up. And that's just not there."[26] University of Kentucky law professor Joshua Douglas said the lawsuits "all seem to have no merit whatsoever".[47] Bradley P. Moss, an attorney specializing in national security, wrote that the suits "continue to defy reason and logic, and are purely theater ... It's all a farce".[48] University of California, Irvine election law professor Rick Hasen said there is "no evidence of fraud so far that could conceivably affect the election results".[25] Barry Richard, who helped to oversee the Republican-led Florida recount effort during the 2000 election, called the lawsuits "entirely without merit" and said they "will not be successful";[49] Gerry McDonough, an attorney who worked for the Gore campaign, said Trump "has no chance of overturning the result—it's just impossible".[50] The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency issued a statement calling the 2020 election "the most secure in American history" and noting "[t]here is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised".[31]

LOL you morons are morons

When few investigations are done there will be little or no evidence to support the unproven claims of those on both sides of the issue of fraud. Is there no apparent evidence of fraud? Maybe, but there is certainly no evidence to support the claim that Democrats did not commit massive fraud. Failure to adequately uncover the facts does not mean the facts do not exist.

 

[pjmret]

No judge has ruled that voter fraud in 2020 was either nonexistent or insignificant, a fact Democrats cannot seem to understand and certainly cannot refute.

No judge has ruled that voter fraud in 2020 was either nonexistent or insignificant, a fact Democrats cannot seem to understand and certainly cannot refute.

they ruled it was insignificant enough not to affect the election, a fact you morons can't seem to understand. and certainly can't refute lol

 

[pjmret]

When few investigations are done there will be little or no evidence to support the unproven claims of those on both sides of the issue of fraud. Is there no apparent evidence of fraud? Maybe, but there is certainly no evidence to support the claim that Democrats did not commit massive fraud. Failure to adequately uncover the facts does not mean the facts do not exist.

all you morons need is credible evidence of this fraud.
and you failed every time. lol

 

[pjmret]

When few investigations are done there will be little or no evidence to support the unproven claims of those on both sides of the issue of fraud. Is there no apparent evidence of fraud? Maybe, but there is certainly no evidence to support the claim that Democrats did not commit massive fraud. Failure to adequately uncover the facts does not mean the facts do not exist.

and you can't prove you aren't a child molester and that trump didn't lose the 2016 eletion. duh.

 

[mark francis]

Report refuted by actual independent expert
That's why the Michigan gop said there was no fraud duh
You are so stupid

Be honest. Did the politicians claim the evidence from adequate investigations proves there was no fraud or did the politicians just claim they never uncovered evidence of fraud? If they claimed adequate investigations proved no fraud took place then let's examine their investigative reports to see if they hold water.

 

[mark francis]

Lansing — A University of Michigan computer science expert says the much-discussed December 2020 report by supporters of Donald Trump on election results in Antrim County "contains an extraordinary number of false, inaccurate or unsubstantiated statements.

Halderman's new analysis said Ramsland arrived at the 68% figure by examining the scanner log of a Nov. 6 re-scan of ballots in Central Lake Township, a township in Antrim County. The log included 15,676 lines with Ramsland classifying 10,667 as errors, equaling a 68% "error rate."

But the 68% finding is "meaningless," said Halderman, who is also co-chair of Michigan’s Election Security Advisory Commission. Scanning a single ballot produces multiple lines in the log, "often including many benign warnings or errors," he said.

Your 68 percent was stupid
Like your clueless expert lol

That is a clever trick focusing on debatable numbers. What about the fact that the security logs were deleted?

 

[mark francis]

Halderman's new analysis said Ramsland arrived at the 68% figure by examining the scanner log of a Nov. 6 re-scan of ballots in Central Lake Township, a township in Antrim County. The log included 15,676 lines with Ramsland classifying 10,667 as errors, equaling a 68% "error rate."

But the 68% finding is "meaningless," said Halderman, who is also co-chair of Michigan’s Election Security Advisory Commission. Scanning a single ballot produces multiple lines in the log, "often including many benign warnings or errors," he said.

Your expert was a ***** lol

What about the deleted security logs?

 

[mark francis]

What facts were rejected *****
List them

Of course the asog report was full of lies they don't count

The security logs were deleted.

 

[mark francis]

What facts were rejected *****
List them

Of course the asog report was full of lies they don't count

Democrats claim the report was wrong but, of course, they don't prove the report was wrong because they are Democrats and Democrats believe they don't have to prove anything.

 

[mark francis]

Of course he's innocent and that's why he is being charged with all these crimes.
37 different charges. First time in history a past poor POTUS is charged with stealing and mishandling secret info. Then there's the inciting violence in j6, investigation and his salience with stormy.
And so it goes on.

I'm prepared to ensure you take your denial of the facts to your grave because god doesn't admit liars in heaven.

Seditious Democrat traitors have been trying to burn President Trump for nearly a decade and he still bats down their trumped charges against him like tennis balls.

 

[mark francis]

they ruled it was insignificant enough not to affect the election, a fact you morons can't seem to understand. and certainly can't refute lol

They conducted no deep investigations into voter fraud and yet they supposedly claimed they found the extent of the voter fraud was insignificant. Surely you can understand why I find that sort of claim preposterous.

 

[mark francis]

all you morons need is credible evidence of this fraud.
and you failed every time. lol

The evidence of fraud is overwhelming, almost as massive as Democrat obstructions of voter fraud investigations.