Leftist protesters invade the Capitol again, but no arrests or long jail terms are expected since these gangsters support Hamas

Werbung:
Boris Norris said:
Science doesn't guess. Religion does.
Science isn't science until it is proven.
Speculation my arse.
Science is the graveyard of religions.
Click to expand...
Secular Humanists may pretend their views on the origin of the universe and the origin of life on earth without God are scientific views, but that is not true. Such views are secular speculations, not scientific revelations.
 
mark francis said:
Science does not teach that matter and energy originated without God and science does not teach that life originated on earth without God. Secular Humanists forcing their religious views about God on school kids illegally teach the kids these unproven dogmas of their atheistic faith.
Click to expand...
No one forces any views about God on students Well except maybe in Christian schools LOL
 
pjmret said:
No one forces any views about God on students Well except maybe in Christian schools LOL
Click to expand...
Of course kids are not forced to accept the lies in textbooks inserted there by deluded leftist atheists but the fact that schools teach the ungodly atheistic dogmas as truth is a violation of the establishment clause against teaching kids false religious views.


1713978283259.webp
 
mark francis said:
Of course kids are not forced to accept the lies in textbooks inserted there by deluded leftist atheists but the fact that schools teach the ungodly atheistic dogmas as truth is a violation of the establishment clause against teaching kids false religious views.
Click to expand...

who teaches atheism as truth in public schools? give me examples proving that.
but you wont
because you are a liar, and god hates liars.
 
mark francis said:
Science does not teach that matter and energy originated without God and science does not teach that life originated on earth without God. Secular Humanists forcing their religious views about God on school kids illegally teach the kids these unproven dogmas of their atheistic faith.
Click to expand...
Science states that there is no proof that God exists or that the universe was created by any such entity.
Secular humanists only ask that teachers not be allowed to teach religion in a public school classroom.

Do you actually believe that claiming that the nation is "under God" in a Pledge of Allegiance causes God to exist?
There was no reason to add this to the Pledge of Allegiance, it was done to annoy nonbelievers.
 
Gabriel_Bell said:
Science states that there is no proof that God exists or that the universe was created by any such entity.
Secular humanists only ask that teachers not be allowed to teach religion in a public school classroom.

Do you actually believe that claiming that the nation is "under God" in a Pledge of Allegiance causes God to exist?
There was no reason to add this to the Pledge of Allegiance, it was done to annoy nonbelievers.
Click to expand...
Science should teach that there is not a better scientific theory for the origin of the universe apart from the creation of God. Failure to properly teach that in science classes is atheistic perversion.
 
mark francis said:
Science should teach that there is not a better scientific theory for the origin of the universe apart from the creation of God. Failure to properly teach that in science classes is atheistic perversion.
Click to expand...
nope, science shouldn't teach that. God is not part of science.
you are a science *****. lol
 
pjmret said:
nope, science shouldn't teach that. God is not part of science.
you are a science *****. lol
Click to expand...
If science is compelled to speak on origins it should admit that God's creation of the universe and life on earth is by far the most reasonable explanation for those origins than any other explanation ever devised by humans. If science cannot tell the truth about origins since it does not have a valid clue, then it should keep its ignorant mouth shut.
 
mark francis said:
If science is compelled to speak on origins it should admit that God's creation of the universe and life on earth is by far the most reasonable explanation for those origins than any other explanation ever devised by humans. If science cannot tell the truth about origins since it does not have a valid clue, then it should keep its ignorant mouth shut.
Click to expand...
nope. god is not part of science. it shouldn't "admit" anything like that. duh
there is no scientific evidence that god is the "most reasonable" explanation.
god you are such a science *****. lol
 
pjmret said:
nope. god is not part of science. it shouldn't "admit" anything like that. duh
there is no scientific evidence that god is the "most reasonable" explanation.
god you are such a science *****. lol
Click to expand...
Science has not offered any better explanation for origins than God's creation so if it claims it has a better explanation than God then it is lying and violating the establishment clause that opposes teaching kids religious lies in support of atheism.
 
mark francis said:
Science has not offered any better explanation for origins than God's creation so if it claims it has a better explanation than God then it is lying and violating the establishment clause that opposes teaching kids religious lies in support of atheism.
Click to expand...

it doesn't claim it has a better explanation than god, because god is out of the scope of science. duh. science doenst mention god at all. duh
 
mark francis said:
If science is ignorant about origins it should tell students that or shut up.
Click to expand...

science presents the best information about the universe, it isn't "ignorant" about it.
if you shut up you wouldn't look like a science *****, but its your choice :)

but in no case does science teach atheism, duh.
 
Werbung:
mark francis said:
Science should teach that there is not a better scientific theory for the origin of the universe apart from the creation of God. Failure to properly teach that in science classes is atheistic perversion.
Click to expand...
Science should do what it always does, which is to declare that there is insufficient proof from the Christian creator deity. Science is about learning the truth, not promoting ancient myths. Science is always open to reexamination of theories. Religion is dogmatic and says that it is true because the Bible says it is true, and God inspired each and every word of it. That is circular logic and as such is defective. Religion rejects all alternative explanations. It used to burn people at the stake who questions the silliness of the official beliefs.

The scientific process is to address a question with as many logical hypotheses as one can and then attempt to disprove each one by one. When there is adequate proof, then the hypothesis becomes a theory. Evolution is a theory. The Biblical version lacks adequate logical proof to become a theory. Au contraire: it is a unproven hypothesis at most.

Is is possible that the universe was created by some entity that then disappeared? Of course! No star in the Universe seems to last forever. Stars are created and then they gradually change. So why would a deity not also change?
Is it possible that the universe was created by some entity that did his thing in this universe and then left to create other universes? That is also possible.
 
Back
Top