Iran's president missing

[the annoying thing]

if any nuclear weapons are used in iran, thousands of small boats with heavily armed martyrs will take off from iranian shores and take
over the oilfields of saudi arabia, kuwait and the uae, all zionist lickspittles.

did you know the missile "strike" on israel by iran was co-ordinated with the us military ?


comrade stalin
teheran

and they would be able to stand up to a American aircraft carrier battle group LOL Our actually work unlike russian junk

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

Their lives what they have always wanted dummy

That is stupid.
Israel was given special privileges in Iran when the Shah was in power.
Under the Shah, it was never allowed fr two Iranians to fly the same plane.
The arrangement was one Iranian and one American, or one Iranian and one Israeli.

Iran uses Israel for propaganda purposes. The rural hicks in Iran tend to be fanatical shiites, and they are the political base for the Ayatollahs. There is NOTHING that Israel has that Iran needs or wants.
Iran would gain nothing by killing a few Israelis,and there is no way they could ever kill more than a few.

Israeli propaganda has been telling us for the last 20 years that Iran is only days away from having a nuclear bomb. That is absurd. If Iran really wanted to have nukes, they would have them by now. Just as Pakistan did, just as Israel did.

Iran's leaders will not nuke the Holy Land because it is holy to them. Of course, they also know that Israel has nukes and lots of them.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

and they would be able to stand up to a American aircraft carrier battle group LOL Our actually work unlike russian junk

Aircraft carriers are pretty much obsolete now that drones are available. In WWII, the big deal was battleships, bt no one builds battleships any more, because aircraft can easily destroy them. Perhaps Russian naval vessels are less battle ready than American carriers, but the fact is that carriers have been rendered obsolete, what with drones that can easily destroy carriers, and GPS, which means that everyone knows where every ship is at every moment. Perhaps submarines are the only exception to this.

 

[the annoying thing]

Aircraft carriers are pretty much obsolete now that drones are available. In WWII, the big deal was battleships, bt no one builds battleships any more, because aircraft can easily destroy them. Perhaps Russian naval vessels are less battle ready than American carriers, but the fact is that carriers have been rendered obsolete, what with drones that can easily destroy carriers, and GPS, which means that everyone knows where every ship is at every moment. Perhaps submarines are the only exception to this.

Air craft carriers are far from obsolete.Your clues. As for Russia they have one air craft carrier it's refered to as those Admiral Kutsitnuttsoff.It has A trail of smoke following it you can see for miles when it able to move under it's own mostly they have to tow it into battle lol .it's caught on fire a few times .it's also the only one they have and it's on dry dock sense 2017 or 2018 .
Do you have any clue the power a American aircraft Carrier battle group has? Do you know how many anti missile and chain guns a battle group has.And Mr PhD who do you think has been shooting down drones from the sea by the hundred ?
Your clueless.

 

[mark francis]

Helicopter carrying Iranian President Raisi crashes, search under way

DUBAI (Reuters) -A helicopter carrying Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi and his foreign minister crashed on Sunday as it was crossing mountain terrain in heavy fog, an Iranian official told Reuters, and rescuers were struggling to reach the site of the incident. The official said the lives of...

www.yahoo.com

This is not something I would normally say, but it would not hurt my feelings if it stays that way.

The world should rejoice that the American Democrat-favored Butcher of Tehran has finally received the just desserts of his wickedness.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

Air craft carriers are far from obsolete.Your clues. As for Russia they have one air craft carrier it's refered to as those Admiral Kutsitnuttsoff.It has A trail of smoke following it you can see for miles when it able to move under it's own mostly they have to tow it into battle lol .it's caught on fire a few times .it's also the only one they have and it's on dry dock sense 2017 or 2018 .
Do you have any clue the power a American aircraft Carrier battle group has? Do you know how many anti missile and chain guns a battle group has.And Mr PhD who do you think has been shooting down drones from the sea by the hundred ?
Your clueless.

It is true that an aircraft carrier is easily rendered useless with drones. This country will never build another carrier. The Russian carrier is clearly obsolete. The Navy refrains from putting its carriers into situations where they might be attacked by drones.

Compare the cost of a carrier group to the cost of the number of drones to render it helpless. Then compare the huge amount of time it would take to build a carrier group to how long it would take to build the drones.

You really like to display your ignorance. There is no carrier named Admiral Kutsitsnutsoff. You are not funny.

 

[the annoying thing]

It is true that an aircraft carrier is easily rendered useless with drones. This country will never build another carrier. The Russian carrier is clearly obsolete. The Navy refrains from putting its carriers into situations where they might be attacked by drones.

Compare the cost of a carrier group to the cost of the number of drones to render it helpless. Then compare the huge amount of time it would take to build a carrier group to how long it would take to build the drones.

You really like to display your ignorance. There is no carrier named Admiral Kutsitsnutsoff. You are not funny.

Thats what we all call it because its useless they should of called it the Admiral Biden or Pelosi .

You had no clue the Russian carrier was obsolete or even how many they have dumb ass. And if carriers are so easy to hit why has no one hit ours dumb ass.

Air craft carriers will not be obsolete for decades as they all us to extend our military power any where in the world and your to ignorant to comprehend why this is important.

We have 11 full sized carriers and some smaller one for special aircraft such as helos . Your ignorance about their capabilities is not unseal as your a liberal with a phd and have little common sense or comprehension of reality.


Here is just a bit of what they are all about. Tell me do you have any military experience ? Any weapons training any common sense courses?
.
They are game changers with a battle group they are not there for the ship dumb ass but the air group .
They carry 70 to 80 of the most modern aircraft in the world and some of the most advanced fighter planes in the world only beat by our own f22 raptor.

How Powerful is the Aircraft Carrier Battle Group? You will be surprised. - Militaryview

Did you know that 80% of countries out there would have their hands full trying to take down an aircraft carrier battle group? How Powerful is the Aircraft

militaryview.com

There is no carrier named Admiral Kutsitsnutsoff. lol coret ***** its a joke cut its nuts off as it is constantly broke down hand would have to be towed into battle the Chinese are building aircraft carriers and want more and India has acquired on from Russia but its junk like the Kutsitsnutsoff.

We have 11 carrier groups do you have any clue how much military power that carries with it .

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

Thats what we all call it because its useless they should of called it the Admiral Biden or Pelosi .

You had no clue the Russian carrier was obsolete or even how many they have dumb ass. And if carriers are so easy to hit why has no one hit ours dumb ass.

Air craft carriers will not be obsolete for decades as they all us to extend our military power any where in the world and your to ignorant to comprehend why this is important.

We have 11 full sized carriers and some smaller one for special aircraft such as helos . Your ignorance about their capabilities is not unseal as your a liberal with a phd and have little common sense or comprehension of reality.


Here is just a bit of what they are all about. Tell me do you have any military experience ? Any weapons training any common sense courses?
.
They are game changers with a battle group they are not there for the ship dumb ass but the air group .
They carry 70 to 80 of the most modern aircraft in the world and some of the most advanced fighter planes in the world only beat by our own f22 raptor.

How Powerful is the Aircraft Carrier Battle Group? You will be surprised. - Militaryview

Did you know that 80% of countries out there would have their hands full trying to take down an aircraft carrier battle group? How Powerful is the Aircraft

militaryview.com

There is no carrier named Admiral Kutsitsnutsoff. lol coret ***** its a joke cut its nuts off as it is constantly broke down hand would have to be towed into battle the Chinese are building aircraft carriers and want more and India has acquired on from Russia but its junk like the Kutsitsnutsoff.

We have 11 carrier groups do you have any clue how much military power that carries with it .

Carriers are not obsolete because they are not up to date, they are obsolete because they can be rendered helpless with drones. It is rather like battleships.

Until recent times, navies often depended on surprise attacks, This is no longer true, satellites make their locations known and surprise attacks impossible.

The Chinese are building a navy so they can intimidate Taiwan. Taiwan is in reality an independent nation, and that annoys the PRC.

 

[the annoying thing]

Carriers are not obsolete because they are not up to date, they are obsolete because they can be rendered helpless with drones. It is rather like battleships.

Until recent times, navies often depended on surprise attacks, This is no longer true, satellites make their locations known and surprise attacks impossible.

The Chinese are building a navy so they can intimidate Taiwan. Taiwan is in reality an independent nation, and that annoys the PRC.

Ok lug nut how many carriers have been disabled by drones . Tell us all .

Are you capable of comprehending the amount of damage it would take to given put a Arlie burke class ship out of action .
Let alone a 1000 ft plus carriers from drones ?

And if you recall iran sent over 3000 drones and ballistic missiles in a attack in the jews and almost all of them were shot down .
A nuke or hypersonic missile or a sub is capable of sinking one if it works and if it isn't shot down first.

And you forget we were able to to shoot down a Interantional missile from space with one of our guided missile destroyers .
your clueless about the military and its capabilities .
your clueless about what capabilities we need or how much fear our navy and air force air wings cause,

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

Ok lug nut how many carriers have been disabled by drones . Tell us all .

Are you capable of comprehending the amount of damage it would take to given put a Arlie burke class ship out of action .
Let alone a 1000 ft plus carriers from drones ?

And if you recall iran sent over 3000 drones and ballistic missiles in a attack in the jews and almost all of them were shot down .
A nuke or hypersonic missile or a sub is capable of sinking one if it works and if it isn't shot down first.

And you forget we were able to to shoot down a Interantional missile from space with one of our guided missile destroyers .
your clueless about the military and its capabilities .
your clueless about what capabilities we need or how much fear our navy and air force air wings cause,

Again, Carriers are obsolete. Drones will continue to improve.
There has not been a drone attack on US carriers because the US is not fighting any marine power.
Not all drones fly, there are drones that swim.

I will leave the tactics up to the Navy and Air Force.

 

[the annoying thing]

Again, Carriers are obsolete. Drones will continue to improve.
There has not been a drone attack on US carriers because the US is not fighting any marine power.
Not all drones fly, there are drones that swim.

I will leave the tactics up to the Navy and Air Force.

Your a idiot you do know that.

13 different countries
Longtime carrier operators like the United Kingdom and Japan have restarted flat-top production, while countries such as China, South Korea, and Turkey are building their first-ever carriers. Below, we’ve compiled a list of about 22 carriers, across 20 ship classes, from 13 different countries.

Yes 13 nations are building aircraft carriers. You have a phd and were a teacher and forget 71 percent of the worlds surface is oceans And we have 195 nations . You need to call the pentagon and the other 12 nations and tell them that they are making a mistake by building more aircraft carriers because they are obsolete Like the carrier group in the middle east that has shot down so many drones and ballistic missiles launched .
Aircraft carries allow a nation to extend its power worldwide . Maybe Biden and you can develop a solar clown car to replace them

 

[mark francis]

It is true that an aircraft carrier is easily rendered useless with drones. This country will never build another carrier. The Russian carrier is clearly obsolete. The Navy refrains from putting its carriers into situations where they might be attacked by drones.

Compare the cost of a carrier group to the cost of the number of drones to render it helpless. Then compare the huge amount of time it would take to build a carrier group to how long it would take to build the drones.

You really like to display your ignorance. There is no carrier named Admiral Kutsitsnutsoff. You are not funny.

There are reasons that military planning experts have not adopted your views.

 

[mark francis]

Carriers are not obsolete because they are not up to date, they are obsolete because they can be rendered helpless with drones. It is rather like battleships.

Until recent times, navies often depended on surprise attacks, This is no longer true, satellites make their locations known and surprise attacks impossible.

The Chinese are building a navy so they can intimidate Taiwan. Taiwan is in reality an independent nation, and that annoys the PRC.

If lefties can do away with the US navy as well as disarm the Amerrican people then rougue nations like China can simply take over the world, including the US, without firing a shot.

 

[pjmret]

If lefties can do away with the US navy as well as disarm the Amerrican people then rougue nations like China can simply take over the world, including the US, without firing a shot.

You must enjoy looking stupid lol

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

I did not say that the Navy should be abolished, I said that carriers have been rendered obsolete because drones can easily render them harmless. They need to develop new and better ships to change with technological innovations, like drones.

You continue to assume that because I have a PhD in Spanish, I am therefore obliged to know everything about everything. Perhaps if you had actually attended even one college you would understand that people study one specialized area. You obviously have some sort of inferiority complex due to your lack of education and make up for it by posting nonsense just to be an "annoying thing".