Don't be ridiculous. The facts must be examined before a conclusion can be drawn. I see how disturbing that process might be to Democrats who are used to declaring what everybody should believe without resorting to investigating the evidence.
i have nothing to prove.You prove nothing so you get no proof.
You clearly do not have a clue about the differences in religious views among those claiming to be Christians back then.
Nearly every voter fraud case was lost to judges' rejection of the cases due to fears of what finding fraud might do to society and his job and reputation.well so far your side has lost every court case claiming actual fraud occurred. lol.
this case doesn't actually claim that, btw, just that it COULD occur.
feel free to hold your breath until this judge declares that actual fraud occured. I'm not sure that's actually part of the court filing, since it started in 2017. duh
nope, unless you can prove that.Nearly every voter fraud case was lost to judges' rejection of the cases due to fears of what finding fraud might do to society and his job and reputation.
You can prove nothing but why do you demand everyone who says anything prove to you something about that statement whether demands for proof are ridiculous or not.i have nothing to prove.
unlike all your unproven claims.
Your ignorance of history is showing. Thousands of early Christians lobbied against slavery from day 1.you clearly don't. lol.
the us was nearly all christians and they voted to enshrine slavery in the constitution.
arguing that is false would make you a true *****.
Your ignorance of history is showing. Thousands of early Christians lobbied against slavery from day 1.
You can prove nothing but why do you demand everyone who says anything prove to you something about that statement whether demands for proof are ridiculous or not.
nope, unless you can prove that.
but of course you can't and won't.
because you are a liar
You claim disobedient Christians overruled obedient Christians on the slavery issue, but you cite no facts or evidence for your biased unsupported opinion.lol, your ignorance of history is showing. "thousands" out of..millions? duh
if christians didn't support slavery it would never have made it into the constitution duh
Judge Rules on Kari Lake’s Review Of 2022 Ballot Envelope Signatures (msn.com) 12-2-23
State Of The Union
Judge Rules on Kari Lake’s Review Of 2022 Ballot Envelope Signatures
Judge Rules on Kari Lake’s Review Of 2022 Ballot Envelope Signatures© Provided by State Of The Union
An Arizona judge denied Kari Lake’s request to review ballot envelope signatures for the 2022 general election, citing concerns about public confidence in the electoral process.
In other words: We don't dare verify signatures on ballots because such focus could undermine confidence in the electoral process.
You claim disobedient Christians overruled obedient Christians on the slavery issue, but you cite no facts or evidence for your biased unsupported opinion.
Yes that correct and your one of them.Democrat looters and liars call Americans who object to the 2020 election theft morons.
Democrats claim investigations into voting verifications cannot be done because personal information may be compromised. Why don't the just admit they do not approve of any election security measures that might uncover voter fraud. So judges refused to examine voting fraud evidence in court because they feared such examinations might compromise voters' personal information?sure, by exposing personal information. that's very logical. duh. exposing signatures means you could forge ballots. duh. and that's bad for confidence in elections. duh.
god this is such simple stuff. lol
