How would the Democrat Party change if lying by their members was made punishable by physical punishment? Whipping? Stockades?

[pjmret]

I should not have to take your words to remind you that no court proved massive Democrat fraud did not occur because courts refused to acknowledge that examining evidence of voting fraud is their duty.

you dont have to take my word for anything.
just educate yourself on how courts work. duh
they did examine the evidence provided, *****. duh.
they did their duty.
you morons just didn't have credible evidence
which is why you lost every court case

 

[mark francis]

you dont have to take my word for anything.
just educate yourself on how courts work. duh
they did examine the evidence provided, *****. duh.
they did their duty.
you morons just didn't have credible evidence
which is why you lost every court case

Courts closed their doors to voting fraud cases long before there was time to gather all the evidence through responsible investigations. There was an eagerness to shut out emerging evidence of fraud and rush to certify Biden's win before the evidence of voting fraud could undo the theft the Democrats had worked so hard to commit.

 

[pjmret]

Courts closed their doors to voting fraud cases long before there was time to gather all the evidence through responsible investigations. There was an eagerness to shut out emerging evidence of fraud and rush to certify Biden's win before the evidence of voting fraud could undo the theft the Democrats had worked so hard to commit.

Doors are never closed at court's ***** you idiots could file cases today God you are such a legal ***** and you always so make excuses because you're lost

 

[LittleGreenMan]

Courts closed their doors to voting fraud cases long before there was time to gather all the evidence through responsible investigations. There was an eagerness to shut out emerging evidence of fraud and rush to certify Biden's win before the evidence of voting fraud could undo the theft the Democrats had worked so hard to commit.

It's worse that that: They ruled that no harm had occurred, yet, -so no cause of action when the GOP asked for better supervision rules before the election, and then said there was no time to investigate after the election took place, -so no cause of action; case dismissed. In the several toss-up states we saw the Dems do every form of fraud possible from videos of boxes of votes pulled out from under tables after other poll workers left the counting area in GA to trucks full of ballots newly printed in NY driven to the polls in PA, California motor-voter automatic registration for everyone and every illegal immigrant who applies for a driver's license, Detroit Police escorting poll watchers out the door and covering the widows with paper, and machines in all the states that registered chunks of Biden votes in four digit increments, -out of the blue, or maybe the internet they weren't supposed to be connected to. The Dems have no honor, and no shame.

 

[pjmret]

It's worse that that: They ruled that no harm had occurred, yet, -so no cause of action when the GOP asked for better supervision rules before the election, and then said there was no time to investigate after the election took place, -so no cause of action; case dismissed. In the several toss-up states we saw the Dems do every form of fraud possible from videos of boxes of votes pulled out from under tables after other poll workers left the counting area in GA to trucks full of ballots newly printed in NY driven to the polls in PA, California motor-voter automatic registration for everyone and every illegal immigrant who applies for a driver's license, Detroit Police escorting poll watchers out the door and covering the widows with paper, and machines in all the states that registered chunks of Biden votes in four digit increments, -out of the blue, or maybe the internet they weren't supposed to be connected to. The Dems have no honor, and no shame.

You morons claim evidence of fraud but couldn't convince a single judge including those appointed by Trump. Intelligent people would conclude your evidence wad worthless but no one ever accused you if being intelligent

 

[mark francis]

Doors are never closed at court's ***** you idiots could file cases today God you are such a legal ***** and you always so make excuses because you're lost

You still have not said why you think courts that rejected voting fraud cases immediately after the election but long before the massive evidence of 2020 voting fraud could be assembled should force Americans to blindly accept the Democrats' word that they committed no fraud and whoever doubts the word of Democrats is an insurrectionist and traitor to democracy.

 

[mark francis]

You morons claim evidence of fraud but couldn't convince a single judge including those appointed by Trump. Intelligent people would conclude your evidence wad worthless but no one ever accused you if being intelligent

Judges who ruled against voting fraud before examining all the evidence proved themselves incapable of justly judging evidence they condemned without examining.

 

[LittleGreenMan]

You morons claim evidence of fraud but couldn't convince a single judge including those appointed by Trump. Intelligent people would conclude your evidence wad worthless but no one ever accused you if being intelligent

You're either just as biased or just as stupid as the judges involved. Which is it?

 

[pjmret]

You still have not said why you think courts that rejected voting fraud cases immediately after the election but long before the massive evidence of 2020 voting fraud could be assembled should force Americans to blindly accept the Democrats' word that they committed no fraud and whoever doubts the word of Democrats is an insurrectionist and traitor to democracy.

i already answered you *****. no one cares if you "accept" it or not. duh. accept it, dont accept it, don't care. duh

you still have not said why you morons haven't started more court actions in the past 3 years with your "mountain of evidence" lol.
but you dont have it, its because your evidence is worthless

 

[pjmret]

You're either just as biased or just as stupid as the judges involved. Which is it?

you are a *****, i don't have a question about that.

prove the judges were biased or stupid. go for it, *****.

you lost over 60 cases, you are saying every single one of them was biased or stupid? every single one? including the ones appointed by trump? lol.
maybe you are stupid enough to say that

 

[mark francis]

i already answered you *****. no one cares if you "accept" it or not. duh. accept it, dont accept it, don't care. duh

you still have not said why you morons haven't started more court actions in the past 3 years with your "mountain of evidence" lol.
but you dont have it, its because your evidence is worthless

Republicans likely realize, like Comey did when refusing to prosecute Hillary for the crimes he admitted she committed, that
trying to take cases to courts that will not prosecute certain criminal acts is pointless.

 

[mark francis]

you are a *****, i don't have a question about that.

prove the judges were biased or stupid. go for it, *****.

you lost over 60 cases, you are saying every single one of them was biased or stupid? every single one? including the ones appointed by trump? lol.
maybe you are stupid enough to say that

60 premature court rejections of voting fraud evidence do not make the evidence invalid and does not dispel American demands for justice and good judgment.

 

[pjmret]

Republicans likely realize, like Comey did when refusing to prosecute Hillary for the crimes he admitted she committed, that
trying to take cases to courts that will not prosecute certain criminal acts is pointless.

Taking proff of Democrat fraud to republican judges would be pointless?
God you truly are a ***** lol

 

[pjmret]

60 premature court rejections of voting fraud evidence do not make the evidence invalid and does not dispel American demands for justice and good judgment.

Wasn't premature duh
And it does make your claim not credible
Good judgement says losing 60 straight times proves you are morons

 

[mark francis]

Taking proff of Democrat fraud to republican judges would be pointless?
God you truly are a ***** lol

You seem to fail to understand that proof of voting fraud has never been produced in any court that refused to take voting fraud cases because the evidence of voting fraud had not yet been proven in court.