No judge even looked into "my" evidence of fraud. I have no idea why you think a judge did.
You're evidence?No judge even looked into "my" evidence of fraud. I have no idea why you think a judge did.
No, judges did not seriously consider evidence before deciding not to take them. Furthermore, the cases that rejected voting fraud claims were soon after the election, not later when investigations provided more irrefutable evidence no judge has ever attempted to refute.are you playing the "its not me personally" stupid card again? lol.
its the "evidence" you claim is evidence we are talking about, *****. lol.
judges have evaluated it and found it not credible. duh.
which is why "you" have lost every court case.
i have no idea why you keep bringing up your "evidence", except that you are a legal *****.
Judges do their own thing. That is why Democrats despise Republican judges because Republican judges do not carry Democrat water like leftist judges who know their bread is buttered by Democrats and therefore rule in favor of democrats whether their rulings are just or not.You're evidence?
You can't even prove there's a god yet you think a judge should take your word?
yes, judges took the cases and evaluated the evidence, *****. they ruled it not credible. duh.No, judges did not seriously consider evidence before deciding not to take them. Furthermore, the cases that rejected voting fraud claims were soon after the election, not later when investigations provided more irrefutable evidence no judge has ever attempted to refute.
That is a lie. Prove a court ruled Democrats did not commit massive voting fraud in the 2020 election or stop saying some court did.yes, judges took the cases and evaluated the evidence, *****. they ruled it not credible. duh.
why didn't you file new court cases then, *****? I keep asking you that and you keep cowardly refusing to answer. lol
I didn't say that ***** lolThat is a lie. Prove a court ruled Democrats did not commit massive voting fraud in the 2020 election or stop saying some court did.
If you admit no court has disproven massive 2020 Democrat voting fraud, then we are on the same page.I didn't say that ***** lol
I have told you that over and over
God you are so stupid lol
If you admit you lost every court case alleging fraud then we are on the same pageIf you admit no court has disproven massive 2020 Democrat voting fraud, then we are on the same page.
Not one single case has been allowed by a judge to proceed to trial. This is the result of all the cases being in Dem jurisdictions where the chief judge assigns who does what. Got case that you want to lean in a particular direction? Assign it to be heard by your beating-buddy and the matter will be resolved ~correctly~. That's what passes for justice in America. Oversight by a State Judiciary authority? That takes a vote to do so by that committee. Federal oversight? By whom, the DOJ? We know that the Dems are like rats, -in every sewer and you’re never far from one.
In the first few hours and days after 2020 polls closed courts made it known they would not accept voting fraud cases. Later, however, courts have been ruling against the 2020 fraud.If you admit you lost every court case alleging fraud then we are on the same page
In spite of obvious judicial bias, no judge has ever ruled that widespread 2020 Democrat voting fraud did not occur.what? what a stupid post. you mean none went to a JURY trial? of course not, these kinds of cases dont go to a JURY trial. duh. they are BENCH trails which are decided by a judge since its not a case of a criminal case against an individual. duh.
cases were held all over the country not just in dem juristictions. duh. they were heard by a variety of judges, including those appointed by trump.
god you post the dumbest things. lol
How did they make it known they wouldn't accept fraud cases? Post your proof lying *****In the first few hours and days after 2020 polls closed courts made it known they would not accept voting fraud cases. Later, however, courts have been ruling against the 2020 fraud.
Wisconsin judge rules that absentee voting van used in 2022 was illegal (msn.com) 1-9-04
Wisconsin judge rules that absentee voting van used in 2022 was illegal
FILE - The City of Racine Clerk's Office mobile voting van is seen on July 26, 2022, at the Dr. Martin Luther King Community Center in Racine, Wis. On Monday, Jan. 8, 2024, a Wisconsin judge ruled that state law does not allow the use of mobile absentee voting sites, siding with Republicans who had challenged the city of Racine's use of the voting van that traveled around the city in 2022. (Ryan Patterson/The Journal Times via AP, File)© Provided by The Associated Press
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A Wisconsin judge ruled Monday that state law does not allow the use of mobile absentee voting sites, siding with Republicans who had challenged the city of Racine's use of a voting van that traveled around the city in 2022.
Republicans opposed the use of the van, the only one of its kind in Wisconsin, saying its use was against the law, increased the chances of voter fraud and was used to bolster Democratic turnout.
You keep saying that as if it proves anything except how much of a legal ***** you are lolIn spite of obvious judicial bias, no judge has ever ruled that widespread 2020 Democrat voting fraud did not occur.
