How can Obama ignore the will of majority?

katsung47

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2011
Messages
411
Why could Bush ignore the will of majority to start war on Iraq?
Why could Bush had a second term when he was a proved lier? (WMD)
Why Obama insists to missile Syria despite opposition from majority?
You still don't know your country is a totalitarian? It says it is democratic. It is not. President and Congress work for the same master - inside group. They never work for the people.
When Bush started Iraq war which was against the will of people, nothing happened. Even when he was proved a lier (WMD), he was still selected for second term. This is a totalitarian country. Most things are fake. Civil rights; election; Constitution..... all are of a cover value. It is a dictatorship. Everything is under domestic control.
 
Werbung:
Why could Bush ignore the will of majority to start war on Iraq?
Bush did not ignore the will of the people, only the wacko leftist and Congress legally voted to approved the invasion.

Why could Bush had a second term when he was a proved lier? (WMD)

Bush was not a liar in the case of the WMD's. It was both US intelligence and foreign intelligence that suggested Hussein had WMD's. Obviously, they were all wrong. This does not make Bush a liar.

Also, Bush was re-elected because the American people, then and today, rejected the Democratic communist agenda.

Why Obama insists to missile Syria despite opposition from majority?
Because he is a Communist who supports not the will of the American people, but the Muslim agenda of a world wide Caliphate!

You still don't know your country is a totalitarian? It says it is democratic. It is not. President and Congress work for the same master - inside group. They never work for the people.
Yes .... I am aware that we are now under a totalitarian government and yes I am aware that we are under a 2 party system of Marxist, both Dem and Repub.

When Bush started Iraq war which was against the will of people, nothing happened. Even when he was proved a lier (WMD), he was still selected for second term. This is a totalitarian country. Most things are fake. Civil rights; election; Constitution..... all are of a cover value. It is a dictatorship. Everything is under domestic control.
Bush did not "start" the Iraq war against the will of the American people. It was against the will of the leftist. These people opposed everything and anything Bush did. These are the same people who now are supporting Obama's Syrian conflict as well as Libya.

And, yes .... I will agree .... everything is a lie under the current regime and the Constitution is worthless today!
 
Bush did not ignore the will of the people, only the wacko leftist and Congress legally voted to approved the invasion.

The people supported the original intent declared by Bush, not the lies that followed the success of that intent. Support for the war began to decline in late 2003, and was definitely opposed to it by 2006:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2006/09/why_americans_oppose_the_iraq.html

In sum, a majority of the American people already believe that President Bush's stated goal in Iraq cannot be achieved. And the trend in these poll numbers is towards more, not fewer, people believing that Iraq will never become a stable, democratic country. In the face of this growing skepticism about the President's nation—building aims in Iraq, public support for the war will continue to erode. Indeed, public opinion polls already show that more than 50 percent of Americans favor a withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. This is the political reality 'on the ground' in this country that almost certainly will lead the next president to pledge to withdraw most or all American forces from Iraq by the end of his first term.


Also, Bush was re-elected because the American people, then and today, rejected the Democratic communist agenda.

Obviously you have no knowledge of what Communism is about. You just think your use of the word makes you appear to be "informed".


Because he is a Communist who supports not the will of the American people, but the Muslim agenda of a world wide Caliphate!

More nonsense from the Texas Tea bagger. In the first place, Muslims strongly oppose Communism.


Yes .... I am aware that we are now under a totalitarian government and yes I am aware that we are under a 2 party system of Marxist, both Dem and Repub.

Interesting since you support the Republicans, and NEVER call them "totalitarians", "communists", or "socialists".


Bush did not "start" the Iraq war against the will of the American people. It was against the will of the leftist. These people opposed everything and anything Bush did. These are the same people who now are supporting Obama's Syrian conflict as well as Libya.

So, according to you John McCain, Lindsey Graham, etc., are now "leftists". The people supported "regime change" in Iraq based on their ignorance of events thanks to the propaganda machine of the right, and emotionalism. The did NOT support "nation building".

And, yes .... I will agree .... everything is a lie under the current regime and the Constitution is worthless today!

The Constitution became worthless when the progressive income tax, and the Fed Reserve Board, were created. It has just become more worthless over the years and even greater so with decisions like the one in Kelo, or Citizens United.
 
Obama and Thugs Pulled Off the Heist of the Century

It is increasingly clear that the 2012 elections, both presidential and senate, were stolen by Obama, the Democratic Party, the IRS, and government employee unions. It’s right out of a mob movie like “The Godfather.”

The Obama Crime Family could give the mob lessons. Don Obama plays for keeps. The Don gets what he wants and when he found himself in danger of losing his power and control, Obama went to his enforcers – the IRS.
 
IRS corruption update -- three key revelations from Lois Lerner’s emails

It may be the most incriminating evidence yet.

Last week, while the world’s eyes were fixed upon the Obama administration’s fumbled response to the Syria crisis, new documents emerged in the allegedly “phony” IRS scandal.

These documents – emails from Lois Lerner, then Director of Exempt Organizations at the IRS – were short, but highly damaging to the IRS’s persistent (and pernicious) spin.
 
The so-called IRS scandal is being blown out of proportion. This is an administrative matter, and is being handled appropriately. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is an agency of the United States Treasury charged with the collection of taxes and the enforcement of the revenue laws enacted by Congress. The IRS operates as a quasi-legislative governmental unit with power delegated by Congress to promulgate revenue regulations that have the force and effect of federal law; and special enforcement power in the in the collection of tax revenues. Taxation is at the very heart of the existence of government, and the life’s blood of government function and policy. The tax laws serve both to impose burdens and confer benefits influencing virtually all commercial, political and social activity. What passes without duty is exempt; and under the law, it is the duty of the IRS to scrutinize those that apply for tax exempt status to ensure compliance. In this, the likelihood that the review and audit procedures of the IRS will be in conflict with those under scrutiny is not just probable, but inevitable.
 
The so-called IRS scandal is being blown out of proportion. This is an administrative matter, and is being handled appropriately. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is an agency of the United States Treasury charged with the collection of taxes and the enforcement of the revenue laws enacted by Congress. The IRS operates as a quasi-legislative governmental unit with power delegated by Congress to promulgate revenue regulations that have the force and effect of federal law; and special enforcement power in the in the collection of tax revenues. Taxation is at the very heart of the existence of government, and the life’s blood of government function and policy. The tax laws serve both to impose burdens and confer benefits influencing virtually all commercial, political and social activity. What passes without duty is exempt; and under the law, it is the duty of the IRS to scrutinize those that apply for tax exempt status to ensure compliance. In this, the likelihood that the review and audit procedures of the IRS will be in conflict with those under scrutiny is not just probable, but inevitable.
You are full of it Mr. Savage. The IRS does not have the right to target and punish the Administrations political enemies. Merely suggesting that tactic was one of the things that got Nixon impeached.

But, not the messiah .... he is truly above the law .... impeachable!
 
The IRS certainly has the right to target any person, entity or group that is suspected of evading the tax laws, both directly and at random audit.
 
It happens every day. The IRS has extraordinary audit and collection powers, as you shall learn for yourself when you receive a notice of assessment for failing to comply with the Affordable Care Act.
 
Werbung:
Back
Top