History of voting fraud dates back more than a century in the US, especially in Chicago

[pjmret]

Yes, there is proof voting fraud in Chicago in 1960 played a huge role in Kennedy's election. When researching an issue, it always helps to get all the facts and examine all the conflicting reports with each other in order to best sort out the truth from the lying propaganda.

These articles are about voting fraud in Chicago, including in the 1960 election.

• Vote Fraud investigation - Task Force - Chicago Tribune · Undercover Reporting (nyu.edu) 10-30-72
• 
  
• This week in history: JFK and the 1960 stolen election in Chicago, Illinois - Chicago Sun-Times (suntimes.com) 12-16-20
• 
  
• IRONIC TWIST: DALEY’S DAD HELPED STEAL VOTE FOR JFK (nypost.com) 11-10-2000

from your own link:
His research found that Nixon was not “cheated out of Illinois’ electoral votes.”

it always helps to read your own links. lol

 

[the annoying thing]

"a history of"..well in recent history we have the republicans convicted of fraud in the 2018 UNITED STATES CONGRESS election. in NC
that's recent history.

well lug nut ***** I can post lots of individuals who cheated but only One president for sure and he was a demo rat

MSN

www.msn.com

 

[pjmret]

well lug nut ***** I can post lots of individuals who cheated but only One president for sure and he was a demo rat

MSN

www.msn.com

which president cheated? name him.

i mean, nixon resigned in the face of charges of cheating to get re-elected, that's the one I can think of, and he's a republican.

 

[mark francis]

well, being ruled AFTER THE FACT is quite different than fraud of course, legal *****.
you have to show they INTENDED to break the law in advance.
can you? no? lol.
legal *****

Don't falsely claim Democrats obeyed all the laws and rules when we know that is not true.

 

[mark francis]

from your own link:
His research found that Nixon was not “cheated out of Illinois’ electoral votes.”

it always helps to read your own links. lol

Nixon caved on the fraud. He fought like a modern Rhino against investigating voter fraud because he thought such exposure of fraud could do irreparable damage to American confidence in elections. Nixon verbalized the same concerns so many judges and officials expressed for opposing investigations into the 2020 election fraud.

 

[pjmret]

Don't falsely claim Democrats obeyed all the laws and rules when we know that is not true.

i claim the ruling was after the fact, as often happens, to both parties.
feel free to prove it was fraud.
but you wont, as always lol

 

[pjmret]

Nixon caved on the fraud. He fought like a modern Rhino against investigating voter fraud because he thought such exposure of fraud could do irreparable damage to American confidence in elections. Nixon verbalized the same concerns so many judges and officials expressed for opposing investigations into the 2020 election fraud.

so..no proof of fraud, as always, from you morons lol

 

[Boris Norris]

The evidence of machine corruption is in the fantastic results cranked out by vulnerable voting machines that defied logic and statistical norms. Add the fact that Democrats themselves warned of the machines vulnerabilities before 2020 and refused to allow republicans to examine the suspect machines immediately after the election left no doubt of the immediate need for the machines to have been examined. Democrats blocked examination of the machines, were caught erasing data on the machines, lost images and tabulators from the machines proved the operators were incompetent at best and criminal at worst.

If course. It's those bloody democrats again. Silly me thought it was only bitterness from the Maga cult.

 

[mark francis]

i claim the ruling was after the fact, as often happens, to both parties.
feel free to prove it was fraud.
but you wont, as always lol

Democrats have been committing voting fraud for more than 100 years. They know how hard it is to prove fraud since investigations are so time consuming and expensive. America should strengthen election securities rather than being forced to accept crooked results because investigations are so hard to conduct.

 

[pjmret]

Democrats have been committing voting fraud for more than 100 years. They know how hard it is to prove fraud since investigations are so time consuming and expensive. America should strengthen election securities rather than being forced to accept crooked results because investigations are so hard to conduct.

Republicans have been committing voting fraud for more than 100 years

 

[mark francis]

Republicans have been committing voting fraud for more than 100 years

That is all the more reason we need to finally do something about fraud that works, instead of letting bad actors advocate for measures the make voting fraud easier for crooks to commit.

 

[pjmret]

That is all the more reason we need to finally do something about fraud that works, instead of letting bad actors advocate for measures the make voting fraud easier for crooks to commit.

well, go for it. advocate all you want. but so far the current system seems to work pretty well.
only a ***** would think you could eliminate all fraud

 

[mark francis]

well, go for it. advocate all you want. but so far the current system seems to work pretty well.
only a ***** would think you could eliminate all fraud

Democrats love it. No photo IDs. No checks by authorities to ensure they purge the huge numbers of ineligible voters from their voting registries. No examinations of Soros' voting machines after an election. No checking to see if non-Americans are voting. No method for ensuring voters do not vote multiple times in the same election. No deadlines for printing and delivering boxes of ballots after an election to make sure every vote counted ensures the Democrat will win. And so much more.

 

[pjmret]

Democrats love it. No photo IDs. No checks by authorities to ensure they purge the huge numbers of ineligible voters from their voting registries. No examinations of Soros' voting machines after an election. No checking to see if non-Americans are voting. No method for ensuring voters do not vote multiple times in the same election. No deadlines for printing and delivering boxes of ballots after an election to make sure every vote counted ensures the Democrat will win. And so much more.

voting machines are examined after elections, *****.
god you're stupid. lol

 

[mark francis]

voting machines are examined after elections, *****.
god you're stupid. lol

Every qualified inspection of 2020 voting machines found serious flaws and evidence of possible corruption, but those inspections of voting machines were few and far between as leftists fought law enforcement officers, concerned election officials, and concerned Americans to prevent them from examining the machines, at least until the operators had wiped them clean.

To hell with crooks who examined their crooked machines and found no fault.

District judge halts 3 Georgia counties from erasing Dominion voting machine data | Fox News 11-30-20

GEORGIA

Published November 30, 2020 11:43am EST​

District judge halts 3 Georgia counties from erasing Dominion voting machine data