Let me know when you lefties finally convince legislators to spend the money and take the time to examine every ballot to verify its legitimacy so you can finally prove the evidence of voting fraud is invalid.sure, study away.
let me know when you morons find that proof of the "stolen election" you whine incessantlly about lol
My bad. The article clearly shows that Democrats had been committing fraud from the mid 20th century until the first decade of the 21st century. For the rest of the history of Democrat fraud from then until now we must examine other records that prove voting fraud has continued until this day.right up to "today"? what "today" do you reference?
Let me know when Democrats are willing to discuss the damning evidence of fraud rationally, openly, and honestly.let me know when you morons have proof of the "stolen election" of 2020. lol
You are right. Democrats have no evidence to back up their unproven claims of election honesty. They cannot prove the vulnerable machines that were hooked up to the internet had not been corrupted by crooks seeking to steal the election. The cannot prove that dead people did not vote in large numbers. They cannot prove that illegitimate voters did not vote in large numbers. They cannot prove that voting machines did not flip votes. They cannot prove that large numbers of people did not vote more than once. They cannot prove their voting registries were not stuffed with tens of thousands of illegitimate names. And so much more.And still no evidence
Let me know when you lefties finally convince legislators to spend the money and take the time to examine every ballot to verify its legitimacy so you can finally prove the evidence of voting fraud is invalid.
a primary election in one city? lol.My bad. The article clearly shows that Democrats had been committing fraud from the mid 20th century until the first decade of the 21st century. For the rest of the history of Democrat fraud from then until now we must examine other records that prove voting fraud has continued until this day.
Election fraud cases break out in 3 Democrat-run states, new voting ordered in one | Just The News 11-6-23
Election fraud cases break out in 3 Democrat-run states, new voting ordered in one
There are differences of opinions in every state about how to prove election fraud or how to certify elections. However, no ballots can be verified without involved investigations requiring days or months to complete, so nobody can disprove the evidence of fraud since nobody committed to thorough investigations to either prove or disprove the presence of fraud.each state has a process they have deemed sufficient to determine the legitimacy of ballots, *****.
nothing will ever prove anything to you morons. republicans for example had their own investigation in arizona and michigan and found nothing, but you morons still whine about a stolen election. lol
Yes, Democrats in one city prove Democrats today are just as aware of voting fraud tricks as they have been for the better part of a century. Furthermore, fraud committed by election officials in one city supports the contention that evidence of 2020 fraud in other cities is valid, not invalid.a primary election in one city? lol.
"wow".
NC had to redo the 2018 US CONGRESS election because of REPUBLICAN fraud. duh
Burden of proof is on you morons claim8ng fraudThere are differences of opinions in every state about how to prove election fraud or how to certify elections. However, no ballots can be verified without involved investigations requiring days or months to complete, so nobody can disprove the evidence of fraud since nobody committed to thorough investigations to either prove or disprove the presence of fraud.
Nope it doesn't prove thatYes, Democrats in one city prove Democrats today are just as aware of voting fraud tricks as they have been for the better part of a century. Furthermore, fraud committed by election officials in one city supports the contention that evidence of 2020 fraud in other cities is valid, not invalid.
Nothing must be proved to agree that proving or disproving voting fraud takes immense investigations that were never done before leftists convinced officials to rush the certification process in spite of all the unrefuted evidence of fraud.Burden of proof is on you morons claim8ng fraud
You failed lol
Certification process followed the ConstitutionNothing must be proved to agree that proving or disproving voting fraud takes immense investigations that were never done before leftists convinced officials to rush the certification process in spite of all the unrefuted evidence of fraud.
Democrats never claimed anything different to every election. Your assumption is bullYou are right. Democrats have no evidence to back up their unproven claims of election honesty.
No more than you can prove they were. The GOP auditors found nothing and fox found the price of telling lies. Yet it's still those evil democrats.They cannot prove the vulnerable machines that were hooked up to the internet had not been corrupted by crooks seeking to steal the election.
Dead people don't suddenly leave their graves on election day. Check the figures of any state you like and the cheating is minimum.The cannot prove that dead people did not vote in large numbers.
They don't have to and have not been requested to do anything. You're the nutter who wants that shit.They cannot prove that illegitimate voters did not vote in large numbers.
I suppose you can prove those machines in 2020 were rigged? You can't? How coincidental.They cannot prove that voting machines did not flip votes.
Neither can you.They cannot prove that large numbers of people did not vote more than once.
And so much more but there's no evidence of any of it. It's just your hate and ignorance bubbling away again. You'll end with a coronary worrying about democrats.They cannot prove their voting registries were not stuffed with tens of thousands of illegitimate names. And so much more.
The mistake the gang made was in certifying the election without verifying the millions of unverified ballots were legitimate. The Constitution does not demand that Americans rush to certify elections that have been tainted with millions of unverified ballots.Certification process followed the Constitution
Your anti-American posts make putin happy
There were millions of unverified ballots and hundreds of verifiable claims of voter fraud the Democrats pushed Congress to ignore and hastily certify the tainted election.Democrats never claimed anything different to every election. Your assumption is bull
There was no proper investigation of the questionable ballots. An investigation of that magnitude would have taken weeks. There was no thorough investigation of that sort before the left moved Congress to blindly certify the results without questioning the legitimacy of millions of unverified ballots.No more than you can prove they were. The GOP auditors found nothing and fox found the price of telling lies. Yet it's still those evil democrats.
