OK. Finally a comittment. You say that you think that our one tenth of one percent contribution to a gas that amounts to five hundred and forty thousanths of the total atmosphere is driving climate change.
Now. If our one tenth of one percent can drive climate change, explain, if you will why the earth's own natural deviation doesn't drive climate change when it can vary by as much as 3% per year.
Clearly, my argument isn't based upon nothing more than the percentage of CO2 in the atmosphere. I was trying to get you to see that your belief that our one tenth of one percent contribution is insignifigant when compared to the earths own natural deviation of up to 3 percent per year. If that natural deviation of 3% isn't enough to tip the scales and cause a shift in climate, how then can our one tenth of one percent contribution have an effect. We would have to produce more than the earth's natural deviation in order to have any affect at all and we don't even come close.
Clearly, it is not a tenth of a percent, but a 35% increase. This has been going on for some time, after all, and is not just a one year change.
You still didn't answer my question: Do you think that insignificant trace of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere would make a difference if we didn't have it at all?