pocketfullofshells
Well-Known Member
Your msnbc dude took a 20 second clip of Beck to make his point, but if you watched the whole hour you would understand what he was talking about was that no one who reported about his life and death spoke about the civil rights issue. Most of them did not mention the kkk exc. and so on.
He talked about it the whole hour even when he changed to other topics he kept coming back to this topic. But I think if you only look at that 30 second clip then its easy to come to the conclusion you did. I watch the show every day, I watched that day.. He read a bio of Byrd by some lib news paper person and it was glowing, then he read a bio of strom thurmond written by the same man and it sounded like satans twin brother, not one decent thing was said. I think the 30 seconds keith O clipped for you was right after reading the bio's side by side and he went into how no one reported the civil rights thing and its as though its been wiped out of American history.
do you have a "real" example of glenn beck being wrong
how about on acorn? Van Jones? Obamas marxist connections? Glenn Beck spends 4 hours a day showing the people obama's marxist connections and the seedy people he spends time with, I would think if Glenn Beck is wrong, you would want it to be on something important like this?
again prove my case...he acts like its a big deal that the tape is not out, when if he thought, he would know there would be no tape. Its not conspiricy, its a fact of life.
Acorn just about everything they said was a lie...Fox in General fails to ever point out that Acorn was the one who said the forms where suspicious and turned them in...but on Fox..and with Beck...they where behind it as some evil plot to turn the US communist.
his Obama is a Marxist Bull? you know why no one bothers to post why he is wrong daily on it? because people like you don't care if he is wrong, you want to believe so you do. Its like proving a Birther Obama was born in the US...there is no proof that would make them happy.
how about when he claimed "BECK: He has 37 czars to oversee and advise him directly. Never before have there been so many executive posts that were not confirmed by Congress and who answered only to the president..
of course that ignors that
1. most where already in place and had been for some time...and 2 that there where more before him, he in fact did not have the most .3...that its completely meaningless regardless..
http://www.factcheck.org/2009/09/czar-search/
Acorn and the census
http://www.factcheck.org/2009/06/acorn-and-the-census/
I would have go back to find some, but I know I recall listing to him cry about this to...
Health care for Dogs...realy ?
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...beck-claims-health-care-bill-includes-insura/
and for your Van Jones..
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...k/glenn-beck-says-van-jones-avowed-communist/
you know I use to be a Republican...does that mean I am still one? or is this only when it fits what you want?